Chess with symmetric move-squareCopycat chess is backEqual Chess ControlEqual Chess Control With One ColorTwo knights jousting on a chessboardThe knight's gameThe Knight Checker or Football ChessA Battle of Dysfunctional Kings (Chess)Fabi and Mag played chess againKnight Checker PuzzleThe ability-swap-circle chessCopycat chess is back

Draw simple lines in Inkscape

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

Is it possible to make sharp wind that can cut stuff from afar?

N.B. ligature in Latex

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

TGV timetables / schedules?

Example of a relative pronoun

Motorized valve interfering with button?

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

Patience, young "Padovan"

Shell script can be run only with sh command

Chess with symmetric move-square

What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?

whey we use polarized capacitor?

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

Why CLRS example on residual networks does not follows its formula?

New order #4: World

"which" command doesn't work / path of Safari?

If Manufacturer spice model and Datasheet give different values which should I use?

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)



Chess with symmetric move-square


Copycat chess is backEqual Chess ControlEqual Chess Control With One ColorTwo knights jousting on a chessboardThe knight's gameThe Knight Checker or Football ChessA Battle of Dysfunctional Kings (Chess)Fabi and Mag played chess againKnight Checker PuzzleThe ability-swap-circle chessCopycat chess is back













2












$begingroup$


Every move in chess involves moving a piece to a square. Let us call this square the "move-square" for that turn.



In the following, the move-square of the black player must be symmetrical (over the obvious center-horizontal) to the move-square by white on that turn. The requirements may be met with a white move, but an additional valid move for black must be shown to exist. This extra move is not included when counting the number of moves taken to reach one of the below conditions.




What is the shortest sequence (with symmetrical move-squares) resulting in a Rook x Rook capture?

Resulting in a Knight x Rook capture?

Resulting in Queen x Bishop capture?











share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for the welcome
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    51 mins ago















2












$begingroup$


Every move in chess involves moving a piece to a square. Let us call this square the "move-square" for that turn.



In the following, the move-square of the black player must be symmetrical (over the obvious center-horizontal) to the move-square by white on that turn. The requirements may be met with a white move, but an additional valid move for black must be shown to exist. This extra move is not included when counting the number of moves taken to reach one of the below conditions.




What is the shortest sequence (with symmetrical move-squares) resulting in a Rook x Rook capture?

Resulting in a Knight x Rook capture?

Resulting in Queen x Bishop capture?











share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for the welcome
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    51 mins ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


Every move in chess involves moving a piece to a square. Let us call this square the "move-square" for that turn.



In the following, the move-square of the black player must be symmetrical (over the obvious center-horizontal) to the move-square by white on that turn. The requirements may be met with a white move, but an additional valid move for black must be shown to exist. This extra move is not included when counting the number of moves taken to reach one of the below conditions.




What is the shortest sequence (with symmetrical move-squares) resulting in a Rook x Rook capture?

Resulting in a Knight x Rook capture?

Resulting in Queen x Bishop capture?











share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Every move in chess involves moving a piece to a square. Let us call this square the "move-square" for that turn.



In the following, the move-square of the black player must be symmetrical (over the obvious center-horizontal) to the move-square by white on that turn. The requirements may be met with a white move, but an additional valid move for black must be shown to exist. This extra move is not included when counting the number of moves taken to reach one of the below conditions.




What is the shortest sequence (with symmetrical move-squares) resulting in a Rook x Rook capture?

Resulting in a Knight x Rook capture?

Resulting in Queen x Bishop capture?








chess checkerboard knight-moves






share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 36 mins ago









Brandon_J

3,558244




3,558244






New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









Artem LuginArtem Lugin

112




112




New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for the welcome
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    51 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for the welcome
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    51 mins ago















$begingroup$
Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Thanks for the welcome
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Thanks for the welcome
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago




2




2




$begingroup$
I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
51 mins ago




$begingroup$
I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
51 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Partial (will update as I go)



R x R




This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting


1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5

Apronus link







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    Under your rules, here are my answers.



    Rook X Rook:




    1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8




    Proof Game:




    Apronus




    Knight X Rook:




    1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8




    Proof Game:




    Apronus




    Queen X Bishop:




    1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4




    Proof Game:




    Apronus




    UPDATE: Do you mean improve my Rook X Rook game like this?




    1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. Rxb6




    Proof Game:




    https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/?m=a4_a5_Ra3_Ra6_Rb3_Rb6_Rxb6







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
      $endgroup$
      – Rewan Demontay
      51 mins ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
      $endgroup$
      – Rewan Demontay
      48 mins ago











    • $begingroup$
      True, but generally any variant will suffice.
      $endgroup$
      – Rewan Demontay
      26 mins ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
      $endgroup$
      – Brandon_J
      20 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
      $endgroup$
      – Artem Lugin
      12 mins ago











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "559"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81507%2fchess-with-symmetric-move-square%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Partial (will update as I go)



    R x R




    This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting


    1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5

    Apronus link







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      Partial (will update as I go)



      R x R




      This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting


      1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5

      Apronus link







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Partial (will update as I go)



        R x R




        This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting


        1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5

        Apronus link







        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Partial (will update as I go)



        R x R




        This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting


        1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5

        Apronus link








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 59 mins ago









        PiIsNot3PiIsNot3

        1,772124




        1,772124





















            2












            $begingroup$

            Under your rules, here are my answers.



            Rook X Rook:




            1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8




            Proof Game:




            Apronus




            Knight X Rook:




            1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8




            Proof Game:




            Apronus




            Queen X Bishop:




            1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4




            Proof Game:




            Apronus




            UPDATE: Do you mean improve my Rook X Rook game like this?




            1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. Rxb6




            Proof Game:




            https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/?m=a4_a5_Ra3_Ra6_Rb3_Rb6_Rxb6







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
              $endgroup$
              – Rewan Demontay
              51 mins ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
              $endgroup$
              – Rewan Demontay
              48 mins ago











            • $begingroup$
              True, but generally any variant will suffice.
              $endgroup$
              – Rewan Demontay
              26 mins ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
              $endgroup$
              – Brandon_J
              20 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
              $endgroup$
              – Artem Lugin
              12 mins ago















            2












            $begingroup$

            Under your rules, here are my answers.



            Rook X Rook:




            1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8




            Proof Game:




            Apronus




            Knight X Rook:




            1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8




            Proof Game:




            Apronus




            Queen X Bishop:




            1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4




            Proof Game:




            Apronus




            UPDATE: Do you mean improve my Rook X Rook game like this?




            1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. Rxb6




            Proof Game:




            https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/?m=a4_a5_Ra3_Ra6_Rb3_Rb6_Rxb6







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
              $endgroup$
              – Rewan Demontay
              51 mins ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
              $endgroup$
              – Rewan Demontay
              48 mins ago











            • $begingroup$
              True, but generally any variant will suffice.
              $endgroup$
              – Rewan Demontay
              26 mins ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
              $endgroup$
              – Brandon_J
              20 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
              $endgroup$
              – Artem Lugin
              12 mins ago













            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Under your rules, here are my answers.



            Rook X Rook:




            1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8




            Proof Game:




            Apronus




            Knight X Rook:




            1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8




            Proof Game:




            Apronus




            Queen X Bishop:




            1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4




            Proof Game:




            Apronus




            UPDATE: Do you mean improve my Rook X Rook game like this?




            1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. Rxb6




            Proof Game:




            https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/?m=a4_a5_Ra3_Ra6_Rb3_Rb6_Rxb6







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Under your rules, here are my answers.



            Rook X Rook:




            1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8




            Proof Game:




            Apronus




            Knight X Rook:




            1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8




            Proof Game:




            Apronus




            Queen X Bishop:




            1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4




            Proof Game:




            Apronus




            UPDATE: Do you mean improve my Rook X Rook game like this?




            1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. Rxb6




            Proof Game:




            https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/?m=a4_a5_Ra3_Ra6_Rb3_Rb6_Rxb6








            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 7 mins ago

























            answered 58 mins ago









            Rewan DemontayRewan Demontay

            56615




            56615











            • $begingroup$
              The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
              $endgroup$
              – Rewan Demontay
              51 mins ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
              $endgroup$
              – Rewan Demontay
              48 mins ago











            • $begingroup$
              True, but generally any variant will suffice.
              $endgroup$
              – Rewan Demontay
              26 mins ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
              $endgroup$
              – Brandon_J
              20 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
              $endgroup$
              – Artem Lugin
              12 mins ago
















            • $begingroup$
              The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
              $endgroup$
              – Rewan Demontay
              51 mins ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
              $endgroup$
              – Rewan Demontay
              48 mins ago











            • $begingroup$
              True, but generally any variant will suffice.
              $endgroup$
              – Rewan Demontay
              26 mins ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
              $endgroup$
              – Brandon_J
              20 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
              $endgroup$
              – Artem Lugin
              12 mins ago















            $begingroup$
            The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
            $endgroup$
            – Rewan Demontay
            51 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
            $endgroup$
            – Rewan Demontay
            51 mins ago




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
            $endgroup$
            – Rewan Demontay
            48 mins ago





            $begingroup$
            Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
            $endgroup$
            – Rewan Demontay
            48 mins ago













            $begingroup$
            True, but generally any variant will suffice.
            $endgroup$
            – Rewan Demontay
            26 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            True, but generally any variant will suffice.
            $endgroup$
            – Rewan Demontay
            26 mins ago




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
            $endgroup$
            – Brandon_J
            20 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
            $endgroup$
            – Brandon_J
            20 mins ago












            $begingroup$
            Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
            $endgroup$
            – Artem Lugin
            12 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
            $endgroup$
            – Artem Lugin
            12 mins ago










            Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81507%2fchess-with-symmetric-move-square%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Isurus Índice Especies | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación"A compendium of fossil marine animal genera (Chondrichthyes entry)"o orixinal"A review of the Tertiary fossil Cetacea (Mammalia) localities in wales port taf Museum Victoria"o orixinalThe Vertebrate Fauna of the Selma Formation of Alabama. Part VII. Part VIII. The Mosasaurs The Fishes50419737IDsh85068767Isurus2548834613242066569678159923NHMSYS00210535017845105743

            Король Коль Исторические данные | Стихотворение | Примечания | Навигацияверсии1 правкаверсии1 правкаA New interpretation of the 'Artognou' stone, TintagelTintagel IslandАрхивировано

            Roughly how much would it cost to hire a team of dwarves to build a home in the mountainside? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How much does a house cost?How long does it take to mine rock?How much does a house cost?How much gold would the construction of a forge cost?How much does a door cost?How much would it cost to make this magic item?How much would a glue bomb cost?How much does mandrake root cost?How much does a slave cost?How much does equipment cost?How much do sheep cost?How much would firearms cost?