why is the limit of this expression equal to 1? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Finding the limit of the following expressionReforming series expression for limit of e$lim_x rightarrow inftyleft(fracpi2-tan^-1xright)^Largefrac1x$ Why aren't these two limits equal when they should be?What is the value of this limit?limit of an expressionUsing a definite integral find the value of $lim_nrightarrow infty (frac1n+frac1n+1+…+frac12n)$Why is the following limit operation valid?Is this expression on limit valid and/or meaningful?Why does this limit equal 0?A Problem on the Limit of an Integral
What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?
How do spell lists change if the party levels up without taking a long rest?
Does Parliament need to approve the new Brexit delay to 31 October 2019?
Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?
Why did Peik Lin say, "I'm not an animal"?
Can I visit the Trinity College (Cambridge) library and see some of their rare books
Huge performance difference of the command find with and without using %M option to show permissions
How can a C program poll for user input while simultaneously performing other actions in a Linux environment?
Visa regaring travelling European country
The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551
How to type a long/em dash `—`
How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?
Is 'stolen' appropriate word?
Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit
Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?
Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?
What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?
Example of compact Riemannian manifold with only one geodesic.
One-dimensional Japanese puzzle
Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?
Do I have Disadvantage attacking with an off-hand weapon?
Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive
Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?
How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?
why is the limit of this expression equal to 1?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Finding the limit of the following expressionReforming series expression for limit of e$lim_x rightarrow inftyleft(fracpi2-tan^-1xright)^Largefrac1x$ Why aren't these two limits equal when they should be?What is the value of this limit?limit of an expressionUsing a definite integral find the value of $lim_nrightarrow infty (frac1n+frac1n+1+…+frac12n)$Why is the following limit operation valid?Is this expression on limit valid and/or meaningful?Why does this limit equal 0?A Problem on the Limit of an Integral
$begingroup$
I found something which I find confusing.
$$
lim_nrightarrow infty fracn!n^k(n-k)! =1
$$
It was something I encountered while learning probability on this webpage.
limits
asked 2 hours ago
billyandrbillyandr
155
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I found something which I find confusing.
$$
lim_nrightarrow infty fracn!n^k(n-k)! =1
$$
It was something I encountered while learning probability on this webpage.
limits
asked 2 hours ago
billyandrbillyandr
155
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I found something which I find confusing.
$$
lim_nrightarrow infty fracn!n^k(n-k)! =1
$$
It was something I encountered while learning probability on this webpage.
limits
asked 2 hours ago
billyandrbillyandr
155
$endgroup$
I found something which I find confusing.
$$
lim_nrightarrow infty fracn!n^k(n-k)! =1
$$
It was something I encountered while learning probability on this webpage.
limits
limits
asked 2 hours ago
billyandrbillyandr
155
asked 2 hours ago
billyandrbillyandr
155
edited 2 hours ago
billyandr
asked 2 hours ago
billyandrbillyandr
155
asked 2 hours ago
billyandrbillyandr
155
asked 2 hours ago
billyandrbillyandr
155
155
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is rather obvious if you cancel the factorials:
$$fracn!n^k(n-k)! =fracoverbracen(n-1)cdots (n-k+1)^k; factorsn^k= 1cdot left(1-frac1nright)cdots left(1-frack-1nright)stackreln to inftylongrightarrow 1$$
answered 1 hour ago
trancelocationtrancelocation
14.1k1829
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you so much. I didn't know it was right there under my eyes.
$endgroup$
– billyandr
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You are welcome. This "not seeing the obvious" just happens once in a while, I think, to all who do maths. So, it is good to have a math platform like this one. :-)
$endgroup$
– trancelocation
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$a_n=fracn!n^k(n-k)! implies log(a_n)=log(n!)-k log(n)-log((n-k)!)$$
Use Stirling approximation and continue with Taylor series to get
$$log(a_n)=frack(1-k)2 n+Oleft(frac1n^2right)$$ Continue with Taylor
$$a_n=e^log(a_n)=1+frack(1-k)2 n+Oleft(frac1n^2right)$$
answered 1 hour ago
Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici
125k1158135
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This has already a slight touch of overkill, hasn't it? :-)
$endgroup$
– trancelocation
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@trancelocation. You are totally right for the limit. One of my manias is to always look at the approach to the limit. Have a look at matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/8339/… . Cheers :-)
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3185830%2fwhy-is-the-limit-of-this-expression-equal-to-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is rather obvious if you cancel the factorials:
$$fracn!n^k(n-k)! =fracoverbracen(n-1)cdots (n-k+1)^k; factorsn^k= 1cdot left(1-frac1nright)cdots left(1-frack-1nright)stackreln to inftylongrightarrow 1$$
answered 1 hour ago
trancelocationtrancelocation
14.1k1829
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you so much. I didn't know it was right there under my eyes.
$endgroup$
– billyandr
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You are welcome. This "not seeing the obvious" just happens once in a while, I think, to all who do maths. So, it is good to have a math platform like this one. :-)
$endgroup$
– trancelocation
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is rather obvious if you cancel the factorials:
$$fracn!n^k(n-k)! =fracoverbracen(n-1)cdots (n-k+1)^k; factorsn^k= 1cdot left(1-frac1nright)cdots left(1-frack-1nright)stackreln to inftylongrightarrow 1$$
answered 1 hour ago
trancelocationtrancelocation
14.1k1829
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you so much. I didn't know it was right there under my eyes.
$endgroup$
– billyandr
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You are welcome. This "not seeing the obvious" just happens once in a while, I think, to all who do maths. So, it is good to have a math platform like this one. :-)
$endgroup$
– trancelocation
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is rather obvious if you cancel the factorials:
$$fracn!n^k(n-k)! =fracoverbracen(n-1)cdots (n-k+1)^k; factorsn^k= 1cdot left(1-frac1nright)cdots left(1-frack-1nright)stackreln to inftylongrightarrow 1$$
answered 1 hour ago
trancelocationtrancelocation
14.1k1829
$endgroup$
It is rather obvious if you cancel the factorials:
$$fracn!n^k(n-k)! =fracoverbracen(n-1)cdots (n-k+1)^k; factorsn^k= 1cdot left(1-frac1nright)cdots left(1-frack-1nright)stackreln to inftylongrightarrow 1$$
answered 1 hour ago
trancelocationtrancelocation
14.1k1829
answered 1 hour ago
trancelocationtrancelocation
14.1k1829
answered 1 hour ago
trancelocationtrancelocation
14.1k1829
answered 1 hour ago
trancelocationtrancelocation
14.1k1829
14.1k1829
$begingroup$
Thank you so much. I didn't know it was right there under my eyes.
$endgroup$
– billyandr
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You are welcome. This "not seeing the obvious" just happens once in a while, I think, to all who do maths. So, it is good to have a math platform like this one. :-)
$endgroup$
– trancelocation
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you so much. I didn't know it was right there under my eyes.
$endgroup$
– billyandr
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You are welcome. This "not seeing the obvious" just happens once in a while, I think, to all who do maths. So, it is good to have a math platform like this one. :-)
$endgroup$
– trancelocation
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thank you so much. I didn't know it was right there under my eyes.
$endgroup$
– billyandr
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thank you so much. I didn't know it was right there under my eyes.
$endgroup$
– billyandr
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You are welcome. This "not seeing the obvious" just happens once in a while, I think, to all who do maths. So, it is good to have a math platform like this one. :-)
$endgroup$
– trancelocation
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You are welcome. This "not seeing the obvious" just happens once in a while, I think, to all who do maths. So, it is good to have a math platform like this one. :-)
$endgroup$
– trancelocation
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$a_n=fracn!n^k(n-k)! implies log(a_n)=log(n!)-k log(n)-log((n-k)!)$$
Use Stirling approximation and continue with Taylor series to get
$$log(a_n)=frack(1-k)2 n+Oleft(frac1n^2right)$$ Continue with Taylor
$$a_n=e^log(a_n)=1+frack(1-k)2 n+Oleft(frac1n^2right)$$
answered 1 hour ago
Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici
125k1158135
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This has already a slight touch of overkill, hasn't it? :-)
$endgroup$
– trancelocation
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@trancelocation. You are totally right for the limit. One of my manias is to always look at the approach to the limit. Have a look at matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/8339/… . Cheers :-)
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$a_n=fracn!n^k(n-k)! implies log(a_n)=log(n!)-k log(n)-log((n-k)!)$$
Use Stirling approximation and continue with Taylor series to get
$$log(a_n)=frack(1-k)2 n+Oleft(frac1n^2right)$$ Continue with Taylor
$$a_n=e^log(a_n)=1+frack(1-k)2 n+Oleft(frac1n^2right)$$
answered 1 hour ago
Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici
125k1158135
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This has already a slight touch of overkill, hasn't it? :-)
$endgroup$
– trancelocation
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@trancelocation. You are totally right for the limit. One of my manias is to always look at the approach to the limit. Have a look at matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/8339/… . Cheers :-)
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$a_n=fracn!n^k(n-k)! implies log(a_n)=log(n!)-k log(n)-log((n-k)!)$$
Use Stirling approximation and continue with Taylor series to get
$$log(a_n)=frack(1-k)2 n+Oleft(frac1n^2right)$$ Continue with Taylor
$$a_n=e^log(a_n)=1+frack(1-k)2 n+Oleft(frac1n^2right)$$
answered 1 hour ago
Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici
125k1158135
$endgroup$
$$a_n=fracn!n^k(n-k)! implies log(a_n)=log(n!)-k log(n)-log((n-k)!)$$
Use Stirling approximation and continue with Taylor series to get
$$log(a_n)=frack(1-k)2 n+Oleft(frac1n^2right)$$ Continue with Taylor
$$a_n=e^log(a_n)=1+frack(1-k)2 n+Oleft(frac1n^2right)$$
answered 1 hour ago
Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici
125k1158135
answered 1 hour ago
Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici
125k1158135
answered 1 hour ago
Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici
125k1158135
answered 1 hour ago
Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici
125k1158135
125k1158135
$begingroup$
This has already a slight touch of overkill, hasn't it? :-)
$endgroup$
– trancelocation
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@trancelocation. You are totally right for the limit. One of my manias is to always look at the approach to the limit. Have a look at matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/8339/… . Cheers :-)
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This has already a slight touch of overkill, hasn't it? :-)
$endgroup$
– trancelocation
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@trancelocation. You are totally right for the limit. One of my manias is to always look at the approach to the limit. Have a look at matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/8339/… . Cheers :-)
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This has already a slight touch of overkill, hasn't it? :-)
$endgroup$
– trancelocation
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This has already a slight touch of overkill, hasn't it? :-)
$endgroup$
– trancelocation
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@trancelocation. You are totally right for the limit. One of my manias is to always look at the approach to the limit. Have a look at matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/8339/… . Cheers :-)
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@trancelocation. You are totally right for the limit. One of my manias is to always look at the approach to the limit. Have a look at matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/8339/… . Cheers :-)
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3185830%2fwhy-is-the-limit-of-this-expression-equal-to-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
