Do airline pilots ever risk not hearing communication directed to them specifically, from traffic controllers?Can Air Traffic Controllers participate in Q&A?Can an airport without an FAA controlled tower have their own tower and controllers?How realistic is the aviation crisis in the recent Spider-Man movie?How can civil ATC maintain safety with military aircraft around?Does the FAA advise or require pilots to wear eyewear designed to protect them from lasers?Are air traffic controllers required to obtain a pilot license?Do GA pilots routinely request “flight following” from ATC, and why?Will air traffic control ever ask a plane to not brake hard on a landing?Restore air traffic controllers' instructions from aircraft tracksCan air traffic control be automated along with flying a plane

How can I hide my bitcoin transactions to protect anonymity from others?

Can a German sentence have two subjects?

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

Draw simple lines in Inkscape

Why is "Reports" in sentence down without "The"

Japan - Plan around max visa duration

Is there really no realistic way for a skeleton monster to move around without magic?

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?

How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

Copenhagen passport control - US citizen

DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?

TGV timetables / schedules?

Symplectic equivalent of commuting matrices

How can I automatically replace [[ and ]] with the [LeftDoubleBracket] and [RightDoubleBracket] operators?

Why CLRS example on residual networks does not follows its formula?

Should I join office cleaning event for free?

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

A function which translates a sentence to title-case

Suffixes -unt and -ut-

How to type dʒ symbol (IPA) on Mac?



Do airline pilots ever risk not hearing communication directed to them specifically, from traffic controllers?


Can Air Traffic Controllers participate in Q&A?Can an airport without an FAA controlled tower have their own tower and controllers?How realistic is the aviation crisis in the recent Spider-Man movie?How can civil ATC maintain safety with military aircraft around?Does the FAA advise or require pilots to wear eyewear designed to protect them from lasers?Are air traffic controllers required to obtain a pilot license?Do GA pilots routinely request “flight following” from ATC, and why?Will air traffic control ever ask a plane to not brake hard on a landing?Restore air traffic controllers' instructions from aircraft tracksCan air traffic control be automated along with flying a plane













5












$begingroup$


I gather pilots communicate regularly with air traffic controllers within air traffic controllers' jurisdiction or airspace as they enter the space, during their time in that space and as they leave. In some or most instances, they will not land in that air space, they are simply passing through and may encounter lots and lots of regional and international air traffic.



They are routinely directed by air traffic controllers to fly at a certain direction, increase or decrease altitude for safety in order to avoid collisions and accidents. In most instances, auto pilot is engaged and I assume the headphones come off, for flights longer than say 2 hours or even 1 hour.



Speaker phone may be on but pilots can read a book or watch a movie on their laptop or revise their reading on knowledge of their ever changing craft. At a certain frequency.



I gather lots of communication to planes occurs and listening to all of them can become tedious and may require too much concentration. In this light, do airline pilots ever risk not hearing communication directed to them specifically, from traffic controllers of space they are flying past on cruise?



Does a light or sound or siren switch on when a message is directed at them and I assume they differentiate communication directed at them by their call sign, e.g., American Airlines Flight 200.



Is there a risk they might not hear it and how is that risk mitigated?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SELCAL
    $endgroup$
    – vasin1987
    14 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Pilots are not allowed to do any of the things you mention. Basically all they can do in the cockpit during cruise is watch the instruments, do flight related stuff (communicating, looking up procedures they'll need next and briefing them and similar), and make small talk. Definitely no book reading or using tablet except as electronic flight bag. They can eat though, and of course they sometimes need to go to the restroom.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    (and note I didn't include fly the plane, because in RVSM space, i.e. above FL290 where most airline flights cruise, using autopilot for altitude hold is required—pilots often do hand-fly approaches and departures, but nobody hand-flies in cruise (in an airliner))
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    1 hour ago
















5












$begingroup$


I gather pilots communicate regularly with air traffic controllers within air traffic controllers' jurisdiction or airspace as they enter the space, during their time in that space and as they leave. In some or most instances, they will not land in that air space, they are simply passing through and may encounter lots and lots of regional and international air traffic.



They are routinely directed by air traffic controllers to fly at a certain direction, increase or decrease altitude for safety in order to avoid collisions and accidents. In most instances, auto pilot is engaged and I assume the headphones come off, for flights longer than say 2 hours or even 1 hour.



Speaker phone may be on but pilots can read a book or watch a movie on their laptop or revise their reading on knowledge of their ever changing craft. At a certain frequency.



I gather lots of communication to planes occurs and listening to all of them can become tedious and may require too much concentration. In this light, do airline pilots ever risk not hearing communication directed to them specifically, from traffic controllers of space they are flying past on cruise?



Does a light or sound or siren switch on when a message is directed at them and I assume they differentiate communication directed at them by their call sign, e.g., American Airlines Flight 200.



Is there a risk they might not hear it and how is that risk mitigated?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SELCAL
    $endgroup$
    – vasin1987
    14 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Pilots are not allowed to do any of the things you mention. Basically all they can do in the cockpit during cruise is watch the instruments, do flight related stuff (communicating, looking up procedures they'll need next and briefing them and similar), and make small talk. Definitely no book reading or using tablet except as electronic flight bag. They can eat though, and of course they sometimes need to go to the restroom.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    (and note I didn't include fly the plane, because in RVSM space, i.e. above FL290 where most airline flights cruise, using autopilot for altitude hold is required—pilots often do hand-fly approaches and departures, but nobody hand-flies in cruise (in an airliner))
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    1 hour ago














5












5








5


2



$begingroup$


I gather pilots communicate regularly with air traffic controllers within air traffic controllers' jurisdiction or airspace as they enter the space, during their time in that space and as they leave. In some or most instances, they will not land in that air space, they are simply passing through and may encounter lots and lots of regional and international air traffic.



They are routinely directed by air traffic controllers to fly at a certain direction, increase or decrease altitude for safety in order to avoid collisions and accidents. In most instances, auto pilot is engaged and I assume the headphones come off, for flights longer than say 2 hours or even 1 hour.



Speaker phone may be on but pilots can read a book or watch a movie on their laptop or revise their reading on knowledge of their ever changing craft. At a certain frequency.



I gather lots of communication to planes occurs and listening to all of them can become tedious and may require too much concentration. In this light, do airline pilots ever risk not hearing communication directed to them specifically, from traffic controllers of space they are flying past on cruise?



Does a light or sound or siren switch on when a message is directed at them and I assume they differentiate communication directed at them by their call sign, e.g., American Airlines Flight 200.



Is there a risk they might not hear it and how is that risk mitigated?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I gather pilots communicate regularly with air traffic controllers within air traffic controllers' jurisdiction or airspace as they enter the space, during their time in that space and as they leave. In some or most instances, they will not land in that air space, they are simply passing through and may encounter lots and lots of regional and international air traffic.



They are routinely directed by air traffic controllers to fly at a certain direction, increase or decrease altitude for safety in order to avoid collisions and accidents. In most instances, auto pilot is engaged and I assume the headphones come off, for flights longer than say 2 hours or even 1 hour.



Speaker phone may be on but pilots can read a book or watch a movie on their laptop or revise their reading on knowledge of their ever changing craft. At a certain frequency.



I gather lots of communication to planes occurs and listening to all of them can become tedious and may require too much concentration. In this light, do airline pilots ever risk not hearing communication directed to them specifically, from traffic controllers of space they are flying past on cruise?



Does a light or sound or siren switch on when a message is directed at them and I assume they differentiate communication directed at them by their call sign, e.g., American Airlines Flight 200.



Is there a risk they might not hear it and how is that risk mitigated?







air-traffic-control airliner radio-communications pilots






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 12 hours ago









Rodrigo de Azevedo

8041519




8041519










asked 15 hours ago









securitydude5securitydude5

3,51042560




3,51042560











  • $begingroup$
    See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SELCAL
    $endgroup$
    – vasin1987
    14 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Pilots are not allowed to do any of the things you mention. Basically all they can do in the cockpit during cruise is watch the instruments, do flight related stuff (communicating, looking up procedures they'll need next and briefing them and similar), and make small talk. Definitely no book reading or using tablet except as electronic flight bag. They can eat though, and of course they sometimes need to go to the restroom.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    (and note I didn't include fly the plane, because in RVSM space, i.e. above FL290 where most airline flights cruise, using autopilot for altitude hold is required—pilots often do hand-fly approaches and departures, but nobody hand-flies in cruise (in an airliner))
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    1 hour ago

















  • $begingroup$
    See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SELCAL
    $endgroup$
    – vasin1987
    14 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Pilots are not allowed to do any of the things you mention. Basically all they can do in the cockpit during cruise is watch the instruments, do flight related stuff (communicating, looking up procedures they'll need next and briefing them and similar), and make small talk. Definitely no book reading or using tablet except as electronic flight bag. They can eat though, and of course they sometimes need to go to the restroom.
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    (and note I didn't include fly the plane, because in RVSM space, i.e. above FL290 where most airline flights cruise, using autopilot for altitude hold is required—pilots often do hand-fly approaches and departures, but nobody hand-flies in cruise (in an airliner))
    $endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    1 hour ago
















$begingroup$
See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SELCAL
$endgroup$
– vasin1987
14 hours ago




$begingroup$
See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SELCAL
$endgroup$
– vasin1987
14 hours ago












$begingroup$
Pilots are not allowed to do any of the things you mention. Basically all they can do in the cockpit during cruise is watch the instruments, do flight related stuff (communicating, looking up procedures they'll need next and briefing them and similar), and make small talk. Definitely no book reading or using tablet except as electronic flight bag. They can eat though, and of course they sometimes need to go to the restroom.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
Pilots are not allowed to do any of the things you mention. Basically all they can do in the cockpit during cruise is watch the instruments, do flight related stuff (communicating, looking up procedures they'll need next and briefing them and similar), and make small talk. Definitely no book reading or using tablet except as electronic flight bag. They can eat though, and of course they sometimes need to go to the restroom.
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
1 hour ago













$begingroup$
(and note I didn't include fly the plane, because in RVSM space, i.e. above FL290 where most airline flights cruise, using autopilot for altitude hold is required—pilots often do hand-fly approaches and departures, but nobody hand-flies in cruise (in an airliner))
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
(and note I didn't include fly the plane, because in RVSM space, i.e. above FL290 where most airline flights cruise, using autopilot for altitude hold is required—pilots often do hand-fly approaches and departures, but nobody hand-flies in cruise (in an airliner))
$endgroup$
– Jan Hudec
1 hour ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

There is a ton of radio communication during the taxi, takeoff and departure phases, and then again during the arrival, landing and taxi phases. Pilots are generally very busy at these times and 100% focused. Airlines have two pilots, and one will be flying while the other works the radios and monitors various instruments.



Cruise is another matter. There generally isn't a lot to do other than keep an eye on the autopilot. The pilots will take turns eating, resting, going to the lav, etc. Radio work usually involves little more than getting handed from one frequency to the next. They may get rerouted due to traffic or weather, but it only takes a few seconds to update the autopilot.



Either way, pilots do occasionally miss radio calls. So does ATC for that matter. It's common enough that nobody gets worried about once or twice, though it's annoying. If it's a real radio problem, there are procedures for both sides to follow to keep everyone safe.



There isn't any sort of light or tone when someone is calling you. However, the standard format is "called station, calling station, message", so your brain can quickly tell whether the message is for you. If so, it focuses and you hear the message; if not, it treats it as background noise.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    When a pilot is given instructions, clearances etc. from a controller, the pilot has to acknowledge they've heard it and certain items need to be read back to the controller. If the controller doesn't hear anything they will repeat their message and keep trying to contact the aircraft. The rules for UK readbacks are included in a CAA document CAP413, along with other conventions and standards for communication between flight radio telephony stations



    It's not that uncommon, these days, for fighter aircraft to be scrambled to intercept unresponsive aircraft



    There is less communication that you'd expect once you've made contact with a controller and been given your clearances. It isn't an onerous task to listen in to all the chat and respond when you hear your callsign






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      -1












      $begingroup$

      Normally pilots do not communicate much with ATCC between airports. For example, in small aircraft normally the pilot will often hear nothing from ATCC unless they have specifically requested flight following. Small VFR aircraft usually fly with a 1200 transponder code which is generic, and in that case it is tricky for an ATCC to even contact the plane at all.



      For larger aircraft, usually a separation is guaranteed from instructions at the beginning of flight and contact is only necessary if something changes, so your guess that they talk to the pilots "regularly" is not really correct.



      Note that most commercial aircraft monitor 121.5 in addition to their assigned frequency and an ATCC will always try that if they are getting no response on an assigned frequency. So, big planes have to screw up twice to go incommunicado completely.



      If an aircraft is unresponsive, then what happens depends on a lot of different factors. The bigger the aircraft, the more actively ATC will react. If it is a small aircraft on IFR, then ATC will assume the pilot is on the wrong frequency and just steer other aircraft around them. If that causes a big problem, the offending pilot will get written up. Usually the pilot will figure out he is out of contact once he gets closer to civilization. If it is a heavy, ATC will make repeated attempts to contact and do the same thing as with a smaller plane: steer others around them. If the heavy is unresponsive and deviates from its flight plan or remains unresponsive for a long time, then fighter aircraft will be scrambled to intercept and observe them. Obviously, if a commercial crew with a lot of passengers goes unresponsive for so long that it requires an intercept, they are going to get in trouble. By "they" I mean the captain and first officer.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        So in essence pilots are assigned a certain frequency and its unique to each plane , also unique to each fight, so the momen they hear the radio, they know its directed to them and no one else and hence they respond
        $endgroup$
        – securitydude5
        12 hours ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @securitydude5 No. There is a common frequency for the controlling station (there may be more than one frequency if there's a lot of traffic). All the appropriate traffic will be on that channel. For example Shannon Approach is 121.400 and everyone flying into Shannon will be on that - you can listen in at liveatc.net/search/?icao=einn
        $endgroup$
        – Dave Gremlin
        11 hours ago











      • $begingroup$
        SO I guess pilots use SELCAL then or so they do not devote all their time to radio listening, perhaps some do some dont? What is the standard?
        $endgroup$
        – securitydude5
        11 hours ago







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @securitydude5 When ATC wants to talk to an aircraft they use an assigned frequency (which is usually one of only one, two or three possibilities that are specific for that center or tower). They address the plane by using its call sign. For a commercial aircraft the call sign usually has their flight number. For example, "Contact Boston Center on 129.1, United One Seven Six Zero".
        $endgroup$
        – Tyler Durden
        10 hours ago







      • 2




        $begingroup$
        @securitydude5 - It's not a good idea to select out other radio calls, they can tell you where other traffic is, what it is and where it's going. Actively listening to other aircraft is encouraged to increase situational awareness
        $endgroup$
        – Dave Gremlin
        7 hours ago











      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "528"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62122%2fdo-airline-pilots-ever-risk-not-hearing-communication-directed-to-them-specifica%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      There is a ton of radio communication during the taxi, takeoff and departure phases, and then again during the arrival, landing and taxi phases. Pilots are generally very busy at these times and 100% focused. Airlines have two pilots, and one will be flying while the other works the radios and monitors various instruments.



      Cruise is another matter. There generally isn't a lot to do other than keep an eye on the autopilot. The pilots will take turns eating, resting, going to the lav, etc. Radio work usually involves little more than getting handed from one frequency to the next. They may get rerouted due to traffic or weather, but it only takes a few seconds to update the autopilot.



      Either way, pilots do occasionally miss radio calls. So does ATC for that matter. It's common enough that nobody gets worried about once or twice, though it's annoying. If it's a real radio problem, there are procedures for both sides to follow to keep everyone safe.



      There isn't any sort of light or tone when someone is calling you. However, the standard format is "called station, calling station, message", so your brain can quickly tell whether the message is for you. If so, it focuses and you hear the message; if not, it treats it as background noise.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        4












        $begingroup$

        There is a ton of radio communication during the taxi, takeoff and departure phases, and then again during the arrival, landing and taxi phases. Pilots are generally very busy at these times and 100% focused. Airlines have two pilots, and one will be flying while the other works the radios and monitors various instruments.



        Cruise is another matter. There generally isn't a lot to do other than keep an eye on the autopilot. The pilots will take turns eating, resting, going to the lav, etc. Radio work usually involves little more than getting handed from one frequency to the next. They may get rerouted due to traffic or weather, but it only takes a few seconds to update the autopilot.



        Either way, pilots do occasionally miss radio calls. So does ATC for that matter. It's common enough that nobody gets worried about once or twice, though it's annoying. If it's a real radio problem, there are procedures for both sides to follow to keep everyone safe.



        There isn't any sort of light or tone when someone is calling you. However, the standard format is "called station, calling station, message", so your brain can quickly tell whether the message is for you. If so, it focuses and you hear the message; if not, it treats it as background noise.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          There is a ton of radio communication during the taxi, takeoff and departure phases, and then again during the arrival, landing and taxi phases. Pilots are generally very busy at these times and 100% focused. Airlines have two pilots, and one will be flying while the other works the radios and monitors various instruments.



          Cruise is another matter. There generally isn't a lot to do other than keep an eye on the autopilot. The pilots will take turns eating, resting, going to the lav, etc. Radio work usually involves little more than getting handed from one frequency to the next. They may get rerouted due to traffic or weather, but it only takes a few seconds to update the autopilot.



          Either way, pilots do occasionally miss radio calls. So does ATC for that matter. It's common enough that nobody gets worried about once or twice, though it's annoying. If it's a real radio problem, there are procedures for both sides to follow to keep everyone safe.



          There isn't any sort of light or tone when someone is calling you. However, the standard format is "called station, calling station, message", so your brain can quickly tell whether the message is for you. If so, it focuses and you hear the message; if not, it treats it as background noise.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          There is a ton of radio communication during the taxi, takeoff and departure phases, and then again during the arrival, landing and taxi phases. Pilots are generally very busy at these times and 100% focused. Airlines have two pilots, and one will be flying while the other works the radios and monitors various instruments.



          Cruise is another matter. There generally isn't a lot to do other than keep an eye on the autopilot. The pilots will take turns eating, resting, going to the lav, etc. Radio work usually involves little more than getting handed from one frequency to the next. They may get rerouted due to traffic or weather, but it only takes a few seconds to update the autopilot.



          Either way, pilots do occasionally miss radio calls. So does ATC for that matter. It's common enough that nobody gets worried about once or twice, though it's annoying. If it's a real radio problem, there are procedures for both sides to follow to keep everyone safe.



          There isn't any sort of light or tone when someone is calling you. However, the standard format is "called station, calling station, message", so your brain can quickly tell whether the message is for you. If so, it focuses and you hear the message; if not, it treats it as background noise.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 3 hours ago









          Pondlife

          52.2k10142290




          52.2k10142290










          answered 4 hours ago









          StephenSStephenS

          5,0661927




          5,0661927





















              3












              $begingroup$

              When a pilot is given instructions, clearances etc. from a controller, the pilot has to acknowledge they've heard it and certain items need to be read back to the controller. If the controller doesn't hear anything they will repeat their message and keep trying to contact the aircraft. The rules for UK readbacks are included in a CAA document CAP413, along with other conventions and standards for communication between flight radio telephony stations



              It's not that uncommon, these days, for fighter aircraft to be scrambled to intercept unresponsive aircraft



              There is less communication that you'd expect once you've made contact with a controller and been given your clearances. It isn't an onerous task to listen in to all the chat and respond when you hear your callsign






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                3












                $begingroup$

                When a pilot is given instructions, clearances etc. from a controller, the pilot has to acknowledge they've heard it and certain items need to be read back to the controller. If the controller doesn't hear anything they will repeat their message and keep trying to contact the aircraft. The rules for UK readbacks are included in a CAA document CAP413, along with other conventions and standards for communication between flight radio telephony stations



                It's not that uncommon, these days, for fighter aircraft to be scrambled to intercept unresponsive aircraft



                There is less communication that you'd expect once you've made contact with a controller and been given your clearances. It isn't an onerous task to listen in to all the chat and respond when you hear your callsign






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  When a pilot is given instructions, clearances etc. from a controller, the pilot has to acknowledge they've heard it and certain items need to be read back to the controller. If the controller doesn't hear anything they will repeat their message and keep trying to contact the aircraft. The rules for UK readbacks are included in a CAA document CAP413, along with other conventions and standards for communication between flight radio telephony stations



                  It's not that uncommon, these days, for fighter aircraft to be scrambled to intercept unresponsive aircraft



                  There is less communication that you'd expect once you've made contact with a controller and been given your clearances. It isn't an onerous task to listen in to all the chat and respond when you hear your callsign






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  When a pilot is given instructions, clearances etc. from a controller, the pilot has to acknowledge they've heard it and certain items need to be read back to the controller. If the controller doesn't hear anything they will repeat their message and keep trying to contact the aircraft. The rules for UK readbacks are included in a CAA document CAP413, along with other conventions and standards for communication between flight radio telephony stations



                  It's not that uncommon, these days, for fighter aircraft to be scrambled to intercept unresponsive aircraft



                  There is less communication that you'd expect once you've made contact with a controller and been given your clearances. It isn't an onerous task to listen in to all the chat and respond when you hear your callsign







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 13 hours ago









                  Dave GremlinDave Gremlin

                  758312




                  758312





















                      -1












                      $begingroup$

                      Normally pilots do not communicate much with ATCC between airports. For example, in small aircraft normally the pilot will often hear nothing from ATCC unless they have specifically requested flight following. Small VFR aircraft usually fly with a 1200 transponder code which is generic, and in that case it is tricky for an ATCC to even contact the plane at all.



                      For larger aircraft, usually a separation is guaranteed from instructions at the beginning of flight and contact is only necessary if something changes, so your guess that they talk to the pilots "regularly" is not really correct.



                      Note that most commercial aircraft monitor 121.5 in addition to their assigned frequency and an ATCC will always try that if they are getting no response on an assigned frequency. So, big planes have to screw up twice to go incommunicado completely.



                      If an aircraft is unresponsive, then what happens depends on a lot of different factors. The bigger the aircraft, the more actively ATC will react. If it is a small aircraft on IFR, then ATC will assume the pilot is on the wrong frequency and just steer other aircraft around them. If that causes a big problem, the offending pilot will get written up. Usually the pilot will figure out he is out of contact once he gets closer to civilization. If it is a heavy, ATC will make repeated attempts to contact and do the same thing as with a smaller plane: steer others around them. If the heavy is unresponsive and deviates from its flight plan or remains unresponsive for a long time, then fighter aircraft will be scrambled to intercept and observe them. Obviously, if a commercial crew with a lot of passengers goes unresponsive for so long that it requires an intercept, they are going to get in trouble. By "they" I mean the captain and first officer.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        So in essence pilots are assigned a certain frequency and its unique to each plane , also unique to each fight, so the momen they hear the radio, they know its directed to them and no one else and hence they respond
                        $endgroup$
                        – securitydude5
                        12 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @securitydude5 No. There is a common frequency for the controlling station (there may be more than one frequency if there's a lot of traffic). All the appropriate traffic will be on that channel. For example Shannon Approach is 121.400 and everyone flying into Shannon will be on that - you can listen in at liveatc.net/search/?icao=einn
                        $endgroup$
                        – Dave Gremlin
                        11 hours ago











                      • $begingroup$
                        SO I guess pilots use SELCAL then or so they do not devote all their time to radio listening, perhaps some do some dont? What is the standard?
                        $endgroup$
                        – securitydude5
                        11 hours ago







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @securitydude5 When ATC wants to talk to an aircraft they use an assigned frequency (which is usually one of only one, two or three possibilities that are specific for that center or tower). They address the plane by using its call sign. For a commercial aircraft the call sign usually has their flight number. For example, "Contact Boston Center on 129.1, United One Seven Six Zero".
                        $endgroup$
                        – Tyler Durden
                        10 hours ago







                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        @securitydude5 - It's not a good idea to select out other radio calls, they can tell you where other traffic is, what it is and where it's going. Actively listening to other aircraft is encouraged to increase situational awareness
                        $endgroup$
                        – Dave Gremlin
                        7 hours ago















                      -1












                      $begingroup$

                      Normally pilots do not communicate much with ATCC between airports. For example, in small aircraft normally the pilot will often hear nothing from ATCC unless they have specifically requested flight following. Small VFR aircraft usually fly with a 1200 transponder code which is generic, and in that case it is tricky for an ATCC to even contact the plane at all.



                      For larger aircraft, usually a separation is guaranteed from instructions at the beginning of flight and contact is only necessary if something changes, so your guess that they talk to the pilots "regularly" is not really correct.



                      Note that most commercial aircraft monitor 121.5 in addition to their assigned frequency and an ATCC will always try that if they are getting no response on an assigned frequency. So, big planes have to screw up twice to go incommunicado completely.



                      If an aircraft is unresponsive, then what happens depends on a lot of different factors. The bigger the aircraft, the more actively ATC will react. If it is a small aircraft on IFR, then ATC will assume the pilot is on the wrong frequency and just steer other aircraft around them. If that causes a big problem, the offending pilot will get written up. Usually the pilot will figure out he is out of contact once he gets closer to civilization. If it is a heavy, ATC will make repeated attempts to contact and do the same thing as with a smaller plane: steer others around them. If the heavy is unresponsive and deviates from its flight plan or remains unresponsive for a long time, then fighter aircraft will be scrambled to intercept and observe them. Obviously, if a commercial crew with a lot of passengers goes unresponsive for so long that it requires an intercept, they are going to get in trouble. By "they" I mean the captain and first officer.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        So in essence pilots are assigned a certain frequency and its unique to each plane , also unique to each fight, so the momen they hear the radio, they know its directed to them and no one else and hence they respond
                        $endgroup$
                        – securitydude5
                        12 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @securitydude5 No. There is a common frequency for the controlling station (there may be more than one frequency if there's a lot of traffic). All the appropriate traffic will be on that channel. For example Shannon Approach is 121.400 and everyone flying into Shannon will be on that - you can listen in at liveatc.net/search/?icao=einn
                        $endgroup$
                        – Dave Gremlin
                        11 hours ago











                      • $begingroup$
                        SO I guess pilots use SELCAL then or so they do not devote all their time to radio listening, perhaps some do some dont? What is the standard?
                        $endgroup$
                        – securitydude5
                        11 hours ago







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @securitydude5 When ATC wants to talk to an aircraft they use an assigned frequency (which is usually one of only one, two or three possibilities that are specific for that center or tower). They address the plane by using its call sign. For a commercial aircraft the call sign usually has their flight number. For example, "Contact Boston Center on 129.1, United One Seven Six Zero".
                        $endgroup$
                        – Tyler Durden
                        10 hours ago







                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        @securitydude5 - It's not a good idea to select out other radio calls, they can tell you where other traffic is, what it is and where it's going. Actively listening to other aircraft is encouraged to increase situational awareness
                        $endgroup$
                        – Dave Gremlin
                        7 hours ago













                      -1












                      -1








                      -1





                      $begingroup$

                      Normally pilots do not communicate much with ATCC between airports. For example, in small aircraft normally the pilot will often hear nothing from ATCC unless they have specifically requested flight following. Small VFR aircraft usually fly with a 1200 transponder code which is generic, and in that case it is tricky for an ATCC to even contact the plane at all.



                      For larger aircraft, usually a separation is guaranteed from instructions at the beginning of flight and contact is only necessary if something changes, so your guess that they talk to the pilots "regularly" is not really correct.



                      Note that most commercial aircraft monitor 121.5 in addition to their assigned frequency and an ATCC will always try that if they are getting no response on an assigned frequency. So, big planes have to screw up twice to go incommunicado completely.



                      If an aircraft is unresponsive, then what happens depends on a lot of different factors. The bigger the aircraft, the more actively ATC will react. If it is a small aircraft on IFR, then ATC will assume the pilot is on the wrong frequency and just steer other aircraft around them. If that causes a big problem, the offending pilot will get written up. Usually the pilot will figure out he is out of contact once he gets closer to civilization. If it is a heavy, ATC will make repeated attempts to contact and do the same thing as with a smaller plane: steer others around them. If the heavy is unresponsive and deviates from its flight plan or remains unresponsive for a long time, then fighter aircraft will be scrambled to intercept and observe them. Obviously, if a commercial crew with a lot of passengers goes unresponsive for so long that it requires an intercept, they are going to get in trouble. By "they" I mean the captain and first officer.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      Normally pilots do not communicate much with ATCC between airports. For example, in small aircraft normally the pilot will often hear nothing from ATCC unless they have specifically requested flight following. Small VFR aircraft usually fly with a 1200 transponder code which is generic, and in that case it is tricky for an ATCC to even contact the plane at all.



                      For larger aircraft, usually a separation is guaranteed from instructions at the beginning of flight and contact is only necessary if something changes, so your guess that they talk to the pilots "regularly" is not really correct.



                      Note that most commercial aircraft monitor 121.5 in addition to their assigned frequency and an ATCC will always try that if they are getting no response on an assigned frequency. So, big planes have to screw up twice to go incommunicado completely.



                      If an aircraft is unresponsive, then what happens depends on a lot of different factors. The bigger the aircraft, the more actively ATC will react. If it is a small aircraft on IFR, then ATC will assume the pilot is on the wrong frequency and just steer other aircraft around them. If that causes a big problem, the offending pilot will get written up. Usually the pilot will figure out he is out of contact once he gets closer to civilization. If it is a heavy, ATC will make repeated attempts to contact and do the same thing as with a smaller plane: steer others around them. If the heavy is unresponsive and deviates from its flight plan or remains unresponsive for a long time, then fighter aircraft will be scrambled to intercept and observe them. Obviously, if a commercial crew with a lot of passengers goes unresponsive for so long that it requires an intercept, they are going to get in trouble. By "they" I mean the captain and first officer.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 13 hours ago









                      Tyler DurdenTyler Durden

                      10.1k12851




                      10.1k12851











                      • $begingroup$
                        So in essence pilots are assigned a certain frequency and its unique to each plane , also unique to each fight, so the momen they hear the radio, they know its directed to them and no one else and hence they respond
                        $endgroup$
                        – securitydude5
                        12 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @securitydude5 No. There is a common frequency for the controlling station (there may be more than one frequency if there's a lot of traffic). All the appropriate traffic will be on that channel. For example Shannon Approach is 121.400 and everyone flying into Shannon will be on that - you can listen in at liveatc.net/search/?icao=einn
                        $endgroup$
                        – Dave Gremlin
                        11 hours ago











                      • $begingroup$
                        SO I guess pilots use SELCAL then or so they do not devote all their time to radio listening, perhaps some do some dont? What is the standard?
                        $endgroup$
                        – securitydude5
                        11 hours ago







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @securitydude5 When ATC wants to talk to an aircraft they use an assigned frequency (which is usually one of only one, two or three possibilities that are specific for that center or tower). They address the plane by using its call sign. For a commercial aircraft the call sign usually has their flight number. For example, "Contact Boston Center on 129.1, United One Seven Six Zero".
                        $endgroup$
                        – Tyler Durden
                        10 hours ago







                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        @securitydude5 - It's not a good idea to select out other radio calls, they can tell you where other traffic is, what it is and where it's going. Actively listening to other aircraft is encouraged to increase situational awareness
                        $endgroup$
                        – Dave Gremlin
                        7 hours ago
















                      • $begingroup$
                        So in essence pilots are assigned a certain frequency and its unique to each plane , also unique to each fight, so the momen they hear the radio, they know its directed to them and no one else and hence they respond
                        $endgroup$
                        – securitydude5
                        12 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @securitydude5 No. There is a common frequency for the controlling station (there may be more than one frequency if there's a lot of traffic). All the appropriate traffic will be on that channel. For example Shannon Approach is 121.400 and everyone flying into Shannon will be on that - you can listen in at liveatc.net/search/?icao=einn
                        $endgroup$
                        – Dave Gremlin
                        11 hours ago











                      • $begingroup$
                        SO I guess pilots use SELCAL then or so they do not devote all their time to radio listening, perhaps some do some dont? What is the standard?
                        $endgroup$
                        – securitydude5
                        11 hours ago







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @securitydude5 When ATC wants to talk to an aircraft they use an assigned frequency (which is usually one of only one, two or three possibilities that are specific for that center or tower). They address the plane by using its call sign. For a commercial aircraft the call sign usually has their flight number. For example, "Contact Boston Center on 129.1, United One Seven Six Zero".
                        $endgroup$
                        – Tyler Durden
                        10 hours ago







                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        @securitydude5 - It's not a good idea to select out other radio calls, they can tell you where other traffic is, what it is and where it's going. Actively listening to other aircraft is encouraged to increase situational awareness
                        $endgroup$
                        – Dave Gremlin
                        7 hours ago















                      $begingroup$
                      So in essence pilots are assigned a certain frequency and its unique to each plane , also unique to each fight, so the momen they hear the radio, they know its directed to them and no one else and hence they respond
                      $endgroup$
                      – securitydude5
                      12 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      So in essence pilots are assigned a certain frequency and its unique to each plane , also unique to each fight, so the momen they hear the radio, they know its directed to them and no one else and hence they respond
                      $endgroup$
                      – securitydude5
                      12 hours ago




                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      @securitydude5 No. There is a common frequency for the controlling station (there may be more than one frequency if there's a lot of traffic). All the appropriate traffic will be on that channel. For example Shannon Approach is 121.400 and everyone flying into Shannon will be on that - you can listen in at liveatc.net/search/?icao=einn
                      $endgroup$
                      – Dave Gremlin
                      11 hours ago





                      $begingroup$
                      @securitydude5 No. There is a common frequency for the controlling station (there may be more than one frequency if there's a lot of traffic). All the appropriate traffic will be on that channel. For example Shannon Approach is 121.400 and everyone flying into Shannon will be on that - you can listen in at liveatc.net/search/?icao=einn
                      $endgroup$
                      – Dave Gremlin
                      11 hours ago













                      $begingroup$
                      SO I guess pilots use SELCAL then or so they do not devote all their time to radio listening, perhaps some do some dont? What is the standard?
                      $endgroup$
                      – securitydude5
                      11 hours ago





                      $begingroup$
                      SO I guess pilots use SELCAL then or so they do not devote all their time to radio listening, perhaps some do some dont? What is the standard?
                      $endgroup$
                      – securitydude5
                      11 hours ago





                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      @securitydude5 When ATC wants to talk to an aircraft they use an assigned frequency (which is usually one of only one, two or three possibilities that are specific for that center or tower). They address the plane by using its call sign. For a commercial aircraft the call sign usually has their flight number. For example, "Contact Boston Center on 129.1, United One Seven Six Zero".
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tyler Durden
                      10 hours ago





                      $begingroup$
                      @securitydude5 When ATC wants to talk to an aircraft they use an assigned frequency (which is usually one of only one, two or three possibilities that are specific for that center or tower). They address the plane by using its call sign. For a commercial aircraft the call sign usually has their flight number. For example, "Contact Boston Center on 129.1, United One Seven Six Zero".
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tyler Durden
                      10 hours ago





                      2




                      2




                      $begingroup$
                      @securitydude5 - It's not a good idea to select out other radio calls, they can tell you where other traffic is, what it is and where it's going. Actively listening to other aircraft is encouraged to increase situational awareness
                      $endgroup$
                      – Dave Gremlin
                      7 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      @securitydude5 - It's not a good idea to select out other radio calls, they can tell you where other traffic is, what it is and where it's going. Actively listening to other aircraft is encouraged to increase situational awareness
                      $endgroup$
                      – Dave Gremlin
                      7 hours ago

















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62122%2fdo-airline-pilots-ever-risk-not-hearing-communication-directed-to-them-specifica%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What does “fit” mean in this sentence? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How does 'jealousy' mean 'suspicion'?What does “not so say” mean?Does “somebody of my caliber” mean the speaker themselves?“accounting for high fasting blood glucose”- help about the meaningWhat does “cloaked by NDA” mean in this context?What does it mean by 'community ownership' in this context?What does “human corroborators” mean in this context?What does “everything but a fire” mean in this context?What does “run” mean here?What does “rabbited” mean/imply in this sentence?

                      Is it wise to focus on putting odd beats on left when playing double bass drums?What does the tie across other different notes mean?How to improve right hand picking/strumming technique for electric and acoustic guitar?How fast is the BPM should you start to use double bass pedal?Alternative or more advanced methods for counting rhythmsLost direction in practicing drumsIs there any way at all to tell if these measures are 6/4 vs. 3/2?Why is alberti bass so tiring?How does 'meter' differ from 'rhythm' in music?Rhythm question about piano sheet notationWhy is Bach's Cello Suite 1 written in 16th notes

                      History of India Contents Prehistoric era (until c. 3300 BCE) Bronze Age – "First urbanisation" (c. 3300 – c. 1800 BCE) Climate change, de-urbanisation, and Indo-Aryan migrations (c.1800 – 1500 BCE) Iron Age - Vedic period (c. 1500 – c. 600 BCE) "Second urbanisation" (c. 600 – c. 200 BCE) Classical to early medieval periods (c. 200 BCE – c. 1200 CE) Late medieval period (c. 1200 – 1526 CE) Early modern period (c. 1526–1858 CE) Modern period and independence (after c. 1850 CE) Historiography See also References Further reading External links Navigation menureviewedee[update]The crisisThe Evolution and History of Human Populations in South Asia: Inter-disciplinary Studies in Archaeology, Biological Anthropology, Linguistics and GeneticsThe Ancient Indus: Urbanism, Economy, and Society"Indus River Valley Civilizations"The Ancient Indus: Urbanism, Economy, and Society"India before the British: The Mughal Empire and its Rivals, 1526–1857"Why Europe Grew Rich and Asia Did Not: Global Economic Divergence, 1600–1850Development Centre Studies The World Economy Historical Statistics: Historical StatisticsDeveloping cultures: case studiesEthnic Groups of South Asia and the Pacific: An Encyclopedia: An Encyclopedia"Indian Economy During British Rule""Economic Impact of the British Rule in India | Indian History"The Bone Readers: Science and Politics in Human Origins Research"Out of Africa: new hypotheses and evidence for the dispersal of Homo sapiens along the Indian Ocean rim"10.3109/0301446100363924920334598"Genetic and archaeological perspectives on the initial modern human colonization of southern Asia"2013PNAS..11010699M10.1073/pnas.1306043110369678523754394"Edakkal Caves|Places Around in Wayanad"Protecting megaliths to keep history alive The Hindu daily"Archaeologists rock solid behind Edakkal Cave"The Global Prehistory of Human Migration"Indus Valley 2,000 years older than thought"the original"Stepwells -Cosmology of Subterranean Architecture as seen in Adalaj"A History of Ancient and Early medieval India : from the Stone Age to the 12th century"Stone celts in Harappa"the original"Peoples and languages in pre-islamic Indus valley"the original"The Sindhi language"the originalThe Aryan chromosome"Fluvial landscapes of the Harappan Civilization"2012PNAS..109E1688G10.1073/pnas.1112743109338705422645375"Is River Ghaggar, Saraswati? Geochemical Constraints""An Ancient Civilization, Upended by Climate Change""Huge Ancient Civilization's Collapse Explained"2003GeoRL..30.1425S10.1029/2002GL0168222006QSRv...25.1283M10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.10.0122011QuInt.229..140M10.1016/j.quaint.2009.11.012Climate Change and the Course of Global History: A Rough JourneyA History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th CenturyA History of Ancient and Mediaeval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th CenturyAntennae SwordA History of IndiaA History of IndiaAn Introduction to Hinduism"India: The Late 2nd Millennium and the Reemergence of Urbanism"The Coinage of Ancient IndiaA Sanskrit reader: with vocabulary and notesPedigree: the origins of words from nature"Early Sanskritization. Origins and Development of the Kuru State"10.11588/ejvs.1995.4.823The Sanskrit epics, Part 2The City in South AsiaThe UpanishadsAn Introduction to HinduismReligions of the World, Second Edition: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Beliefs and PracticesA History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th CenturyEarly India: From the Origins to AD 1300Republics in ancient Indiapp. 83ff"Magadha Empire""Lumbini Development Trust: Restoring the Lumbini Garden"the originalThe great armies of antiquityarchived"The Achaemenid Persian Empire (550–330 B.C.)""East–West Orientation of Historical Empires"1076-156X"Dinner on the Grand Trunk Road"10.2307/32502263250226"Silappathikaram Tamil Literature"the originalManimekalai – English transliteration of Tamil originalIndian Temple Architecture: Form and Transformation : the Karṇāṭa Drāviḍa Tradition, 7th to 13th CenturiesBuddhist ArchitectureA History of India"The World Economy (GDP) : Historical Statistics by Professor Angus Maddison"The World Economy – Volume 1: A Millennial Perspective and Volume 2: Historical Statistics10.2307/32502140004-36483250214A Comprehensive History of India: Volume 2Between the Empires: Society in India, 300 to 400Emergence of Viṣṇu and Śiva Images in India: Numismatic and Sculptural Evidence"Parthian Pair of Earrings"the originalThe Medical Times and Gazette, Volume 1Greatest emporium in the worldThe Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BCBuddhist Records of the Western WorldArchaeology in Soviet Central AsiaThe Grandeur of Gandhara: The Ancient Buddhist Civilization of the Swat, Peshawar, Kabul and Indus ValleysIndian Sculpture: Circa 500 B.C.-A.D. 700"The History of Pakistan: The Kushans"Gupta Dynasty – MSN Encartathe original"India – Historical Setting – The Classical Age – Gupta and Harsha""Gupta Dynasty, Golden Age Of India"the original"The Age of the Guptas and After"the originalNumber Theory and Its History"Gupta dynasty (Indian dynasty)""Gupta dynasty: empire in 4th century"the original"The Story of India – Photo Gallery"The ASI say499315420"Pallava script"p. 145"CNG: eAuction 329. INDIA, Post-Gupta (Ganges Valley). Vardhanas of Thanesar and Kanauj. Harshavardhana. Circa AD 606–647. AR Drachm (13mm, 2.28 g, 1h)""Harsha""Sthanvishvara (historical region, India)""Harsha (Indian emperor)"Shyama Kumar Chattopadhyaya (2000) The Philosophy of Sankar's Advaita VedantaShankara's IntroductionShankara's Introduction19373677Shankara's IntroductionIs The Buddhist 'No-Self' Doctrine Compatible With Pursuing Nirvana?The Seven Spiritual Laws Of YogaIndia: The Ancient Past. A History of the Indian-Subcontinent from 7000 BC to AD 1200The Kashmir Series: Glimpses of Kashmiri Culture – Vivekananda Kendra, Kanyakumari (p. 57).Al-Hind: Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam, 7th–11th CenturiesHistory of GopāchalaLand of Two Rivers: A History of Bengal from the Mahabharata to MujibEuropean Trade and Colonial ConquestA History of IndiaA Comprehensive History Of Ancient India (3 Vol. Set)"The Last Years of Cholas: The decline and fall of a dynasty"the originalFascinating Hindutva: Saffron Politics and Dalit MobilisationGazetteer of the province of OudhAl- Hind: The slave kings and the Islamic conquest. 2"Shahi Family"The Cambridge history of Islam"Ameer Nasir-ood-deen Subooktugeen"Gazetteer of the Attock District, 1930, Part 1Land of seven rivers: History of India's GeographyTemple Desecration and Indo-Muslim StatesIslam in South Asia: A Short HistoryBeyond Orientalism: The Work of Wilhelm Halbfass and Its Impact on Indian and Cross-cultural StudiesThe Making of Terrorism in Pakistan: Historical and Social Roots of ExtremismOrnament in Indian ArchitectureA historical review of Hindu India: 300 B.C. to 1200 A.D."Indian States and Union Territories"Islam in South Asia: A Short HistoryA Brief History of the Indian PeoplesThe Modern ReviewDelhi Sultanate"Battuta's Travels: Delhi, capital of Muslim India"the original"Timur – conquest of India"the originalIndia HandbookBhaktiThe Four Denomination of Hinduism10.1007/s11407-008-9049-925691067"Vijayanagara Research Project::Elephant Stables"10.2307/26465262646526Historical Dictionary of the TamilsBihar General Knowledge DigestMapping Bihar: From Medieval to Modern TimesPopular Literature and Pre-modern Societies in South AsiaA manual of the Kistna district in the presidency of MadrasAncient Indian History and CivilizationFragmented Memories: Struggling to be Tai-Ahom in India"The Islamic World to 1600: Rise of the Great Islamic Empires (The Mughal Empire)"the originalDynasties: A Global History of Power, 1300–1800, p. 105"Whose fort is it anyway"10.1111/0020-8833.000532600793Development Centre Studies The World Economy Historical Statistics: Historical Statistics"India's Deindustrialization in the 18th and 19th Centuries"The Mughal Empire, p. 190"The Long Globalization and Textile Producers in India"The Mughal World: Life in India's Last Golden AgeAurangzeb: The Life and Legacy of India's Most Controversial KingIn the Shadow of the Taj: A Portrait of Agra"Iran in the Age of the Raj"p. 8610.2307/20539802053980Delhi, the Capital of IndiaAn Advanced History of Modern India"Journal of the Tanjore Maharaja Serfoji's Sarasvati Mahal Library"The Rediscovery of India: A New SubcontinentIslamic Renaissance In South Asia (1707–1867) : The Role Of Shah Waliallah & His SuccessorsAn Advanced History of Modern IndiaThe Great Maratha Mahadaji Scindia"Full text of "Selections from the papers of Lord Metcalfe; late governor-general of India, governor of Jamaica, and governor-general of Canada""The Discovery Of IndiaThe Sacred City of the Hindus: An Account of Benares in Ancient and Modern TimesResurrecting Banaras: Urban Space, Architecture and Religious BoundariesFaith & Philosophy of Sikhism"Missiles mainstay of Pak's N-arsenal"History Modern India By S.N. Sen"Sirajuddaula"ArchivedLongman History & Civics (Dual Government in Bengal)Madhya Pradesh National Means-Cum-Merit Scholarship Exam (Warren Hasting's system of Dual Government)A Military History of Britain: from 1775 to the PresentIndian Cultural Heritage Perspective For TourismHindu Rulers, Muslim Subjects: Islam, Rights, and the History of KashmirIndian HistoryAn Atlas and Survey of South Asian HistoryAn Historical Account of the British Trade Over the Caspian SeaIndian Merchants and Eurasian Trade, 1600–1750The Indian diaspora in Central Asia and its trade, 1550–1900From Constantinople to the home of Omar Khayyam: travels in Transcaucasia and northern Persia for historic and literary researchA journey from Bengal to England: through the northern part of India, Kashmire, Afghanistan, and Persia, and into Russia, by the Caspian-SeaA Second Journey through Persia, Armenia, and Asia Minor, to Constantinople, between the Years 1810 and 1816Reports from the consuls of the United States, 1887Portugal and its Empire, 1250–1800 (Collected Essays in Memory of Glenn J. Ames).: Portuguese Studies Review, Vol. 17, No. 1The Dutch Power in Kerala, 1729–1758http://mod.nic.inArchivedDossier Goa – A Recusa do Sacrifício InútilAn Imperial Crisis in British India: The Manipur Uprising of 1891The Truth of Babri Mosque"Kolkata (Calcutta) : History"the original"Robert Clive, Baron Clive, 'Clive of India', 1725–1774""The Transformation from a Pre-Colonial to a Colonial Order: The Case of India"10.2307/25955872595587A versatile geniusArchived10.1109/MWSYM.1997.602854"Rabindranath Tagore on Education"the original"Essay on 'Derozio and the Young Bengal Movement'"Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation"Plague"the originalPopulation Growth and Land Use"Reintegrating India with the World Economy""Census Of India 1931"A history of modern India, 1480–1950"'India's well-timed diversification of army helped democracy' | Business Standard News"Bal Gangadhar Tilak: Struggle for Swaraj"Participants from the Indian subcontinent in the First World War""Commonwealth War Graves Commission Annual Report 2007–2008 Online"the original1462689197110.1017/s0010417500016534178920Eurocentrism: a marxian critical realist critique"Ranjit Guha, "On Some Aspects of Historiography of Colonial India""10.2307/2168385216838510.7202/016593ar"Harvard scholar says the idea of India dates to a much earlier time than the British or the Mughals""In The Footsteps of Pilgrims""India's spiritual landscape: The heavens and the earth""India: A Sacred Geography by Diana L Eck – review"Modern India: The Origins of an Asian Democracy10.2307/21694222169422964322464"The Indian Subcontinent and 'Out of Africa 1'"254043308Encyclopedia of World ReligionsThe Evolution and History of Human Populations in South Asia: Inter-disciplinary Studies in Archaeology, Biological Anthropology, Linguistics and Genetics"The Early Paleolithic of the Indian Subcontinent: Hominin Colonization, Dispersals and Occupation History"Ancient Indian History and CivilizationAncient Indian Social History: Some Interpretationsthe originalIndia Before EuropeA Concise History of Modern India"The beginning of the historical period, c. 500–150 BCE"full textA History of Indiathe originalexcerpt and text searchexcerptexcerptAn Economic History of India: From Pre-Colonial Times to 1991excerpt and text searchexcerpt and text searchIndia as known to the ancient world10.1111/j.1468-0289.1985.tb00391.x2597191onlineThe History of India, as told by its own historians. The Muhammadan Periodonline editionHans William Brown research collection on 19th-century missionary work in India, 1882–1932, Ms. Coll. 1033, Kislak Center for Special Collections, Rare Books and Manuscripts, University of Pennsylvaniaee