How does a Death Domain cleric's Touch of Death feature work with Touch-range spells delivered by familiars? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Time to retire the [rules-as-written] tag?If my kobold uses a familiar to deliver Shocking Grasp, do I roll with advantage thanks to Pack Tactics?Can clerics use spell scrolls for spells they receive through their Divine domains?Familiar and touch spellsHow much will Vampiric Touch heal if combined with Touch of Death?Can the Death Cleric's Channel Divinity stack with the Paladin's Smite?I am neither a Wizard, nor a Warlock. How can I get a “full-featured” familiar?Does a touch-range spell cast using Find Familiar have to have line of sight from the caster?Can metamagic be applied to a spell delivered by a familiar?How does the Mirror Image spell interact with the Trickery cleric's Invoke Duplicity ability?Can a multiclassed barbarian/cleric use their Channel Divinity while raging?For a multiclassed cleric/wizard, can cleric class features be applied to my wizard spells, and vice versa?

Java 8 stream max() function argument type Comparator vs Comparable

Gastric acid as a weapon

List *all* the tuples!

3 doors, three guards, one stone

Letter Boxed validator

Doubts about chords

How can players work together to take actions that are otherwise impossible?

How to bypass password on Windows XP account?

What is this single-engine low-wing propeller plane?

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

Single word antonym of "flightless"

Stars Make Stars

What is the musical term for a note that continously plays through a melody?

How to draw this diagram using TikZ package?

Is there a documented rationale why the House Ways and Means chairman can demand tax info?

What's the purpose of writing one's academic bio in 3rd person?

G-Code for resetting to 100% speed

Can a non-EU citizen traveling with me come with me through the EU passport line?

What makes black pepper strong or mild?

If 'B is more likely given A', then 'A is more likely given B'

Is 1 ppb equal to 1 μg/kg?

When is phishing education going too far?

How discoverable are IPv6 addresses and AAAA names by potential attackers?

What are 'alternative tunings' of a guitar and why would you use them? Doesn't it make it more difficult to play?



How does a Death Domain cleric's Touch of Death feature work with Touch-range spells delivered by familiars?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Time to retire the [rules-as-written] tag?If my kobold uses a familiar to deliver Shocking Grasp, do I roll with advantage thanks to Pack Tactics?Can clerics use spell scrolls for spells they receive through their Divine domains?Familiar and touch spellsHow much will Vampiric Touch heal if combined with Touch of Death?Can the Death Cleric's Channel Divinity stack with the Paladin's Smite?I am neither a Wizard, nor a Warlock. How can I get a “full-featured” familiar?Does a touch-range spell cast using Find Familiar have to have line of sight from the caster?Can metamagic be applied to a spell delivered by a familiar?How does the Mirror Image spell interact with the Trickery cleric's Invoke Duplicity ability?Can a multiclassed barbarian/cleric use their Channel Divinity while raging?For a multiclassed cleric/wizard, can cleric class features be applied to my wizard spells, and vice versa?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5












$begingroup$


My player is playing a Death Domain cleric. They have the Channel Divinity option Touch of Death (DMG, p. 97), which deals extra necrotic damage on a hit with a melee attack. They also have the find familiar spell from the Ritual Caster feat (PHB, p. 169), choosing the wizard spell list. They were wondering, based around the wording of find familiar, if a touch spell from the familiar can still trigger the Touch of Death ability.



Can a touch spell delivered by the familiar trigger the Death Domain cleric's Touch of Death?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    5












    $begingroup$


    My player is playing a Death Domain cleric. They have the Channel Divinity option Touch of Death (DMG, p. 97), which deals extra necrotic damage on a hit with a melee attack. They also have the find familiar spell from the Ritual Caster feat (PHB, p. 169), choosing the wizard spell list. They were wondering, based around the wording of find familiar, if a touch spell from the familiar can still trigger the Touch of Death ability.



    Can a touch spell delivered by the familiar trigger the Death Domain cleric's Touch of Death?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      My player is playing a Death Domain cleric. They have the Channel Divinity option Touch of Death (DMG, p. 97), which deals extra necrotic damage on a hit with a melee attack. They also have the find familiar spell from the Ritual Caster feat (PHB, p. 169), choosing the wizard spell list. They were wondering, based around the wording of find familiar, if a touch spell from the familiar can still trigger the Touch of Death ability.



      Can a touch spell delivered by the familiar trigger the Death Domain cleric's Touch of Death?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      My player is playing a Death Domain cleric. They have the Channel Divinity option Touch of Death (DMG, p. 97), which deals extra necrotic damage on a hit with a melee attack. They also have the find familiar spell from the Ritual Caster feat (PHB, p. 169), choosing the wizard spell list. They were wondering, based around the wording of find familiar, if a touch spell from the familiar can still trigger the Touch of Death ability.



      Can a touch spell delivered by the familiar trigger the Death Domain cleric's Touch of Death?







      dnd-5e spells class-feature cleric familiars






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago









      V2Blast

      27.3k595165




      27.3k595165










      asked 4 hours ago









      Brendan TriceBrendan Trice

      1086




      1086




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Yes (arguably), as long as the familiar is delivering a spell that involves a melee spell attack



          The relevant section of find familiar says:




          Finally, when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell. Your familiar must be within 100 feet of you, and it must use its reaction to deliver the spell when you cast it. If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll.




          This line only applies to spells with a range of "Touch".



          The Death Domain cleric's Channel Divinity option, Touch of Death, says (DMG, p. 97):




          Starting at 2nd level, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to destroy another creature’s life force by touch.



          When the cleric hits a creature with a melee attack, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to deal extra necrotic damage to the target. The damage equals 5 + twice his or her cleric level.




          This only applies to melee attacks by the cleric. Since it's not specified, this applies to both melee weapon attacks and melee spell attacks.



          One example of a touch-range cleric spell that involves a melee spell attack is inflict wounds:




          Make a melee spell attack against a creature you can reach. On a hit, the target takes 3d10 necrotic damage.




          Thus, the question simply comes down to whether it counts as the cleric hitting the target if their familiar is delivering the spell.



          Since find familiar specifies that "If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll", I'd argue that they're functionally equivalent. Thus, I'd rule as DM that any melee spell attack delivered by the familiar that hits qualifies for Touch of Death.



          The counterargument



          Of course, the reverse argument could be made, too. The familiar delivers the spell "as if it had cast the spell", so one could argue that aside from using your attack modifier, it's as if the familiar made the attack - and thus argue that if the familiar delivers a spell, the cleric is not the one making the attack so they can't use Touch of Death.



          It's ambiguous, and could be interpreted either way. Thus, the DM and players should come to a ruling that makes the most sense to them, and be consistent with it.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            This answer to a related issue uses the opposite reasoning for the same quote. Just food for thought
            $endgroup$
            – David Coffron
            3 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @DavidCoffron: Fair enough! I did include "(arguably)" for a reason :P
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            3 hours ago


















          0












          $begingroup$

          No. Channel Divinity abilities are not spells



          Forget the "touch" part - familiars can only cast spells, and Touch of Death is not a spell.



          The find familiar spell description reads:




          ...when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can
          deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell.




          This feature of find familiar only works on "spells". A "spell" is not just any magical ability; it is a defined term. From the Player's Handbook, p. 202:




          When a character casts any spell, the same basic rules are followed,
          regardless of the character’s class or the spell’s effects.



          Each spell description begins with a block of information, including
          the spell’s name, level, school of magic, casting time, range,
          components, and duration. The rest of a spell entry describes the
          spell’s effect.




          We know that Touch of Death is not a spell because it is missing some of the attributes described above: level, school of magic, and components. It also does not appear in the list of spells in the rule book.



          Not a spell, therefor the familiar can't cast it.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "122"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145269%2fhow-does-a-death-domain-clerics-touch-of-death-feature-work-with-touch-range-sp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            Yes (arguably), as long as the familiar is delivering a spell that involves a melee spell attack



            The relevant section of find familiar says:




            Finally, when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell. Your familiar must be within 100 feet of you, and it must use its reaction to deliver the spell when you cast it. If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll.




            This line only applies to spells with a range of "Touch".



            The Death Domain cleric's Channel Divinity option, Touch of Death, says (DMG, p. 97):




            Starting at 2nd level, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to destroy another creature’s life force by touch.



            When the cleric hits a creature with a melee attack, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to deal extra necrotic damage to the target. The damage equals 5 + twice his or her cleric level.




            This only applies to melee attacks by the cleric. Since it's not specified, this applies to both melee weapon attacks and melee spell attacks.



            One example of a touch-range cleric spell that involves a melee spell attack is inflict wounds:




            Make a melee spell attack against a creature you can reach. On a hit, the target takes 3d10 necrotic damage.




            Thus, the question simply comes down to whether it counts as the cleric hitting the target if their familiar is delivering the spell.



            Since find familiar specifies that "If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll", I'd argue that they're functionally equivalent. Thus, I'd rule as DM that any melee spell attack delivered by the familiar that hits qualifies for Touch of Death.



            The counterargument



            Of course, the reverse argument could be made, too. The familiar delivers the spell "as if it had cast the spell", so one could argue that aside from using your attack modifier, it's as if the familiar made the attack - and thus argue that if the familiar delivers a spell, the cleric is not the one making the attack so they can't use Touch of Death.



            It's ambiguous, and could be interpreted either way. Thus, the DM and players should come to a ruling that makes the most sense to them, and be consistent with it.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              This answer to a related issue uses the opposite reasoning for the same quote. Just food for thought
              $endgroup$
              – David Coffron
              3 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @DavidCoffron: Fair enough! I did include "(arguably)" for a reason :P
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              3 hours ago















            4












            $begingroup$

            Yes (arguably), as long as the familiar is delivering a spell that involves a melee spell attack



            The relevant section of find familiar says:




            Finally, when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell. Your familiar must be within 100 feet of you, and it must use its reaction to deliver the spell when you cast it. If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll.




            This line only applies to spells with a range of "Touch".



            The Death Domain cleric's Channel Divinity option, Touch of Death, says (DMG, p. 97):




            Starting at 2nd level, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to destroy another creature’s life force by touch.



            When the cleric hits a creature with a melee attack, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to deal extra necrotic damage to the target. The damage equals 5 + twice his or her cleric level.




            This only applies to melee attacks by the cleric. Since it's not specified, this applies to both melee weapon attacks and melee spell attacks.



            One example of a touch-range cleric spell that involves a melee spell attack is inflict wounds:




            Make a melee spell attack against a creature you can reach. On a hit, the target takes 3d10 necrotic damage.




            Thus, the question simply comes down to whether it counts as the cleric hitting the target if their familiar is delivering the spell.



            Since find familiar specifies that "If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll", I'd argue that they're functionally equivalent. Thus, I'd rule as DM that any melee spell attack delivered by the familiar that hits qualifies for Touch of Death.



            The counterargument



            Of course, the reverse argument could be made, too. The familiar delivers the spell "as if it had cast the spell", so one could argue that aside from using your attack modifier, it's as if the familiar made the attack - and thus argue that if the familiar delivers a spell, the cleric is not the one making the attack so they can't use Touch of Death.



            It's ambiguous, and could be interpreted either way. Thus, the DM and players should come to a ruling that makes the most sense to them, and be consistent with it.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              This answer to a related issue uses the opposite reasoning for the same quote. Just food for thought
              $endgroup$
              – David Coffron
              3 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @DavidCoffron: Fair enough! I did include "(arguably)" for a reason :P
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              3 hours ago













            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            Yes (arguably), as long as the familiar is delivering a spell that involves a melee spell attack



            The relevant section of find familiar says:




            Finally, when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell. Your familiar must be within 100 feet of you, and it must use its reaction to deliver the spell when you cast it. If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll.




            This line only applies to spells with a range of "Touch".



            The Death Domain cleric's Channel Divinity option, Touch of Death, says (DMG, p. 97):




            Starting at 2nd level, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to destroy another creature’s life force by touch.



            When the cleric hits a creature with a melee attack, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to deal extra necrotic damage to the target. The damage equals 5 + twice his or her cleric level.




            This only applies to melee attacks by the cleric. Since it's not specified, this applies to both melee weapon attacks and melee spell attacks.



            One example of a touch-range cleric spell that involves a melee spell attack is inflict wounds:




            Make a melee spell attack against a creature you can reach. On a hit, the target takes 3d10 necrotic damage.




            Thus, the question simply comes down to whether it counts as the cleric hitting the target if their familiar is delivering the spell.



            Since find familiar specifies that "If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll", I'd argue that they're functionally equivalent. Thus, I'd rule as DM that any melee spell attack delivered by the familiar that hits qualifies for Touch of Death.



            The counterargument



            Of course, the reverse argument could be made, too. The familiar delivers the spell "as if it had cast the spell", so one could argue that aside from using your attack modifier, it's as if the familiar made the attack - and thus argue that if the familiar delivers a spell, the cleric is not the one making the attack so they can't use Touch of Death.



            It's ambiguous, and could be interpreted either way. Thus, the DM and players should come to a ruling that makes the most sense to them, and be consistent with it.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Yes (arguably), as long as the familiar is delivering a spell that involves a melee spell attack



            The relevant section of find familiar says:




            Finally, when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell. Your familiar must be within 100 feet of you, and it must use its reaction to deliver the spell when you cast it. If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll.




            This line only applies to spells with a range of "Touch".



            The Death Domain cleric's Channel Divinity option, Touch of Death, says (DMG, p. 97):




            Starting at 2nd level, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to destroy another creature’s life force by touch.



            When the cleric hits a creature with a melee attack, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to deal extra necrotic damage to the target. The damage equals 5 + twice his or her cleric level.




            This only applies to melee attacks by the cleric. Since it's not specified, this applies to both melee weapon attacks and melee spell attacks.



            One example of a touch-range cleric spell that involves a melee spell attack is inflict wounds:




            Make a melee spell attack against a creature you can reach. On a hit, the target takes 3d10 necrotic damage.




            Thus, the question simply comes down to whether it counts as the cleric hitting the target if their familiar is delivering the spell.



            Since find familiar specifies that "If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll", I'd argue that they're functionally equivalent. Thus, I'd rule as DM that any melee spell attack delivered by the familiar that hits qualifies for Touch of Death.



            The counterargument



            Of course, the reverse argument could be made, too. The familiar delivers the spell "as if it had cast the spell", so one could argue that aside from using your attack modifier, it's as if the familiar made the attack - and thus argue that if the familiar delivers a spell, the cleric is not the one making the attack so they can't use Touch of Death.



            It's ambiguous, and could be interpreted either way. Thus, the DM and players should come to a ruling that makes the most sense to them, and be consistent with it.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 3 hours ago

























            answered 4 hours ago









            V2BlastV2Blast

            27.3k595165




            27.3k595165











            • $begingroup$
              This answer to a related issue uses the opposite reasoning for the same quote. Just food for thought
              $endgroup$
              – David Coffron
              3 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @DavidCoffron: Fair enough! I did include "(arguably)" for a reason :P
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              3 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              This answer to a related issue uses the opposite reasoning for the same quote. Just food for thought
              $endgroup$
              – David Coffron
              3 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @DavidCoffron: Fair enough! I did include "(arguably)" for a reason :P
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              3 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            This answer to a related issue uses the opposite reasoning for the same quote. Just food for thought
            $endgroup$
            – David Coffron
            3 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            This answer to a related issue uses the opposite reasoning for the same quote. Just food for thought
            $endgroup$
            – David Coffron
            3 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @DavidCoffron: Fair enough! I did include "(arguably)" for a reason :P
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            3 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @DavidCoffron: Fair enough! I did include "(arguably)" for a reason :P
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            3 hours ago













            0












            $begingroup$

            No. Channel Divinity abilities are not spells



            Forget the "touch" part - familiars can only cast spells, and Touch of Death is not a spell.



            The find familiar spell description reads:




            ...when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can
            deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell.




            This feature of find familiar only works on "spells". A "spell" is not just any magical ability; it is a defined term. From the Player's Handbook, p. 202:




            When a character casts any spell, the same basic rules are followed,
            regardless of the character’s class or the spell’s effects.



            Each spell description begins with a block of information, including
            the spell’s name, level, school of magic, casting time, range,
            components, and duration. The rest of a spell entry describes the
            spell’s effect.




            We know that Touch of Death is not a spell because it is missing some of the attributes described above: level, school of magic, and components. It also does not appear in the list of spells in the rule book.



            Not a spell, therefor the familiar can't cast it.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              No. Channel Divinity abilities are not spells



              Forget the "touch" part - familiars can only cast spells, and Touch of Death is not a spell.



              The find familiar spell description reads:




              ...when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can
              deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell.




              This feature of find familiar only works on "spells". A "spell" is not just any magical ability; it is a defined term. From the Player's Handbook, p. 202:




              When a character casts any spell, the same basic rules are followed,
              regardless of the character’s class or the spell’s effects.



              Each spell description begins with a block of information, including
              the spell’s name, level, school of magic, casting time, range,
              components, and duration. The rest of a spell entry describes the
              spell’s effect.




              We know that Touch of Death is not a spell because it is missing some of the attributes described above: level, school of magic, and components. It also does not appear in the list of spells in the rule book.



              Not a spell, therefor the familiar can't cast it.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                No. Channel Divinity abilities are not spells



                Forget the "touch" part - familiars can only cast spells, and Touch of Death is not a spell.



                The find familiar spell description reads:




                ...when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can
                deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell.




                This feature of find familiar only works on "spells". A "spell" is not just any magical ability; it is a defined term. From the Player's Handbook, p. 202:




                When a character casts any spell, the same basic rules are followed,
                regardless of the character’s class or the spell’s effects.



                Each spell description begins with a block of information, including
                the spell’s name, level, school of magic, casting time, range,
                components, and duration. The rest of a spell entry describes the
                spell’s effect.




                We know that Touch of Death is not a spell because it is missing some of the attributes described above: level, school of magic, and components. It also does not appear in the list of spells in the rule book.



                Not a spell, therefor the familiar can't cast it.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                No. Channel Divinity abilities are not spells



                Forget the "touch" part - familiars can only cast spells, and Touch of Death is not a spell.



                The find familiar spell description reads:




                ...when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can
                deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell.




                This feature of find familiar only works on "spells". A "spell" is not just any magical ability; it is a defined term. From the Player's Handbook, p. 202:




                When a character casts any spell, the same basic rules are followed,
                regardless of the character’s class or the spell’s effects.



                Each spell description begins with a block of information, including
                the spell’s name, level, school of magic, casting time, range,
                components, and duration. The rest of a spell entry describes the
                spell’s effect.




                We know that Touch of Death is not a spell because it is missing some of the attributes described above: level, school of magic, and components. It also does not appear in the list of spells in the rule book.



                Not a spell, therefor the familiar can't cast it.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 1 hour ago

























                answered 1 hour ago









                Pink SweetenerPink Sweetener

                3,1631629




                3,1631629



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145269%2fhow-does-a-death-domain-clerics-touch-of-death-feature-work-with-touch-range-sp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What does “fit” mean in this sentence? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How does 'jealousy' mean 'suspicion'?What does “not so say” mean?Does “somebody of my caliber” mean the speaker themselves?“accounting for high fasting blood glucose”- help about the meaningWhat does “cloaked by NDA” mean in this context?What does it mean by 'community ownership' in this context?What does “human corroborators” mean in this context?What does “everything but a fire” mean in this context?What does “run” mean here?What does “rabbited” mean/imply in this sentence?

                    Is it wise to focus on putting odd beats on left when playing double bass drums?What does the tie across other different notes mean?How to improve right hand picking/strumming technique for electric and acoustic guitar?How fast is the BPM should you start to use double bass pedal?Alternative or more advanced methods for counting rhythmsLost direction in practicing drumsIs there any way at all to tell if these measures are 6/4 vs. 3/2?Why is alberti bass so tiring?How does 'meter' differ from 'rhythm' in music?Rhythm question about piano sheet notationWhy is Bach's Cello Suite 1 written in 16th notes

                    History of India Contents Prehistoric era (until c. 3300 BCE) Bronze Age – "First urbanisation" (c. 3300 – c. 1800 BCE) Climate change, de-urbanisation, and Indo-Aryan migrations (c.1800 – 1500 BCE) Iron Age - Vedic period (c. 1500 – c. 600 BCE) "Second urbanisation" (c. 600 – c. 200 BCE) Classical to early medieval periods (c. 200 BCE – c. 1200 CE) Late medieval period (c. 1200 – 1526 CE) Early modern period (c. 1526–1858 CE) Modern period and independence (after c. 1850 CE) Historiography See also References Further reading External links Navigation menureviewedee[update]The crisisThe Evolution and History of Human Populations in South Asia: Inter-disciplinary Studies in Archaeology, Biological Anthropology, Linguistics and GeneticsThe Ancient Indus: Urbanism, Economy, and Society"Indus River Valley Civilizations"The Ancient Indus: Urbanism, Economy, and Society"India before the British: The Mughal Empire and its Rivals, 1526–1857"Why Europe Grew Rich and Asia Did Not: Global Economic Divergence, 1600–1850Development Centre Studies The World Economy Historical Statistics: Historical StatisticsDeveloping cultures: case studiesEthnic Groups of South Asia and the Pacific: An Encyclopedia: An Encyclopedia"Indian Economy During British Rule""Economic Impact of the British Rule in India | Indian History"The Bone Readers: Science and Politics in Human Origins Research"Out of Africa: new hypotheses and evidence for the dispersal of Homo sapiens along the Indian Ocean rim"10.3109/0301446100363924920334598"Genetic and archaeological perspectives on the initial modern human colonization of southern Asia"2013PNAS..11010699M10.1073/pnas.1306043110369678523754394"Edakkal Caves|Places Around in Wayanad"Protecting megaliths to keep history alive The Hindu daily"Archaeologists rock solid behind Edakkal Cave"The Global Prehistory of Human Migration"Indus Valley 2,000 years older than thought"the original"Stepwells -Cosmology of Subterranean Architecture as seen in Adalaj"A History of Ancient and Early medieval India : from the Stone Age to the 12th century"Stone celts in Harappa"the original"Peoples and languages in pre-islamic Indus valley"the original"The Sindhi language"the originalThe Aryan chromosome"Fluvial landscapes of the Harappan Civilization"2012PNAS..109E1688G10.1073/pnas.1112743109338705422645375"Is River Ghaggar, Saraswati? Geochemical Constraints""An Ancient Civilization, Upended by Climate Change""Huge Ancient Civilization's Collapse Explained"2003GeoRL..30.1425S10.1029/2002GL0168222006QSRv...25.1283M10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.10.0122011QuInt.229..140M10.1016/j.quaint.2009.11.012Climate Change and the Course of Global History: A Rough JourneyA History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th CenturyA History of Ancient and Mediaeval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th CenturyAntennae SwordA History of IndiaA History of IndiaAn Introduction to Hinduism"India: The Late 2nd Millennium and the Reemergence of Urbanism"The Coinage of Ancient IndiaA Sanskrit reader: with vocabulary and notesPedigree: the origins of words from nature"Early Sanskritization. Origins and Development of the Kuru State"10.11588/ejvs.1995.4.823The Sanskrit epics, Part 2The City in South AsiaThe UpanishadsAn Introduction to HinduismReligions of the World, Second Edition: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Beliefs and PracticesA History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th CenturyEarly India: From the Origins to AD 1300Republics in ancient Indiapp. 83ff"Magadha Empire""Lumbini Development Trust: Restoring the Lumbini Garden"the originalThe great armies of antiquityarchived"The Achaemenid Persian Empire (550–330 B.C.)""East–West Orientation of Historical Empires"1076-156X"Dinner on the Grand Trunk Road"10.2307/32502263250226"Silappathikaram Tamil Literature"the originalManimekalai – English transliteration of Tamil originalIndian Temple Architecture: Form and Transformation : the Karṇāṭa Drāviḍa Tradition, 7th to 13th CenturiesBuddhist ArchitectureA History of India"The World Economy (GDP) : Historical Statistics by Professor Angus Maddison"The World Economy – Volume 1: A Millennial Perspective and Volume 2: Historical Statistics10.2307/32502140004-36483250214A Comprehensive History of India: Volume 2Between the Empires: Society in India, 300 to 400Emergence of Viṣṇu and Śiva Images in India: Numismatic and Sculptural Evidence"Parthian Pair of Earrings"the originalThe Medical Times and Gazette, Volume 1Greatest emporium in the worldThe Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BCBuddhist Records of the Western WorldArchaeology in Soviet Central AsiaThe Grandeur of Gandhara: The Ancient Buddhist Civilization of the Swat, Peshawar, Kabul and Indus ValleysIndian Sculpture: Circa 500 B.C.-A.D. 700"The History of Pakistan: The Kushans"Gupta Dynasty – MSN Encartathe original"India – Historical Setting – The Classical Age – Gupta and Harsha""Gupta Dynasty, Golden Age Of India"the original"The Age of the Guptas and After"the originalNumber Theory and Its History"Gupta dynasty (Indian dynasty)""Gupta dynasty: empire in 4th century"the original"The Story of India – Photo Gallery"The ASI say499315420"Pallava script"p. 145"CNG: eAuction 329. INDIA, Post-Gupta (Ganges Valley). Vardhanas of Thanesar and Kanauj. Harshavardhana. Circa AD 606–647. AR Drachm (13mm, 2.28 g, 1h)""Harsha""Sthanvishvara (historical region, India)""Harsha (Indian emperor)"Shyama Kumar Chattopadhyaya (2000) The Philosophy of Sankar's Advaita VedantaShankara's IntroductionShankara's Introduction19373677Shankara's IntroductionIs The Buddhist 'No-Self' Doctrine Compatible With Pursuing Nirvana?The Seven Spiritual Laws Of YogaIndia: The Ancient Past. A History of the Indian-Subcontinent from 7000 BC to AD 1200The Kashmir Series: Glimpses of Kashmiri Culture – Vivekananda Kendra, Kanyakumari (p. 57).Al-Hind: Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam, 7th–11th CenturiesHistory of GopāchalaLand of Two Rivers: A History of Bengal from the Mahabharata to MujibEuropean Trade and Colonial ConquestA History of IndiaA Comprehensive History Of Ancient India (3 Vol. Set)"The Last Years of Cholas: The decline and fall of a dynasty"the originalFascinating Hindutva: Saffron Politics and Dalit MobilisationGazetteer of the province of OudhAl- Hind: The slave kings and the Islamic conquest. 2"Shahi Family"The Cambridge history of Islam"Ameer Nasir-ood-deen Subooktugeen"Gazetteer of the Attock District, 1930, Part 1Land of seven rivers: History of India's GeographyTemple Desecration and Indo-Muslim StatesIslam in South Asia: A Short HistoryBeyond Orientalism: The Work of Wilhelm Halbfass and Its Impact on Indian and Cross-cultural StudiesThe Making of Terrorism in Pakistan: Historical and Social Roots of ExtremismOrnament in Indian ArchitectureA historical review of Hindu India: 300 B.C. to 1200 A.D."Indian States and Union Territories"Islam in South Asia: A Short HistoryA Brief History of the Indian PeoplesThe Modern ReviewDelhi Sultanate"Battuta's Travels: Delhi, capital of Muslim India"the original"Timur – conquest of India"the originalIndia HandbookBhaktiThe Four Denomination of Hinduism10.1007/s11407-008-9049-925691067"Vijayanagara Research Project::Elephant Stables"10.2307/26465262646526Historical Dictionary of the TamilsBihar General Knowledge DigestMapping Bihar: From Medieval to Modern TimesPopular Literature and Pre-modern Societies in South AsiaA manual of the Kistna district in the presidency of MadrasAncient Indian History and CivilizationFragmented Memories: Struggling to be Tai-Ahom in India"The Islamic World to 1600: Rise of the Great Islamic Empires (The Mughal Empire)"the originalDynasties: A Global History of Power, 1300–1800, p. 105"Whose fort is it anyway"10.1111/0020-8833.000532600793Development Centre Studies The World Economy Historical Statistics: Historical Statistics"India's Deindustrialization in the 18th and 19th Centuries"The Mughal Empire, p. 190"The Long Globalization and Textile Producers in India"The Mughal World: Life in India's Last Golden AgeAurangzeb: The Life and Legacy of India's Most Controversial KingIn the Shadow of the Taj: A Portrait of Agra"Iran in the Age of the Raj"p. 8610.2307/20539802053980Delhi, the Capital of IndiaAn Advanced History of Modern India"Journal of the Tanjore Maharaja Serfoji's Sarasvati Mahal Library"The Rediscovery of India: A New SubcontinentIslamic Renaissance In South Asia (1707–1867) : The Role Of Shah Waliallah & His SuccessorsAn Advanced History of Modern IndiaThe Great Maratha Mahadaji Scindia"Full text of "Selections from the papers of Lord Metcalfe; late governor-general of India, governor of Jamaica, and governor-general of Canada""The Discovery Of IndiaThe Sacred City of the Hindus: An Account of Benares in Ancient and Modern TimesResurrecting Banaras: Urban Space, Architecture and Religious BoundariesFaith & Philosophy of Sikhism"Missiles mainstay of Pak's N-arsenal"History Modern India By S.N. Sen"Sirajuddaula"ArchivedLongman History & Civics (Dual Government in Bengal)Madhya Pradesh National Means-Cum-Merit Scholarship Exam (Warren Hasting's system of Dual Government)A Military History of Britain: from 1775 to the PresentIndian Cultural Heritage Perspective For TourismHindu Rulers, Muslim Subjects: Islam, Rights, and the History of KashmirIndian HistoryAn Atlas and Survey of South Asian HistoryAn Historical Account of the British Trade Over the Caspian SeaIndian Merchants and Eurasian Trade, 1600–1750The Indian diaspora in Central Asia and its trade, 1550–1900From Constantinople to the home of Omar Khayyam: travels in Transcaucasia and northern Persia for historic and literary researchA journey from Bengal to England: through the northern part of India, Kashmire, Afghanistan, and Persia, and into Russia, by the Caspian-SeaA Second Journey through Persia, Armenia, and Asia Minor, to Constantinople, between the Years 1810 and 1816Reports from the consuls of the United States, 1887Portugal and its Empire, 1250–1800 (Collected Essays in Memory of Glenn J. Ames).: Portuguese Studies Review, Vol. 17, No. 1The Dutch Power in Kerala, 1729–1758http://mod.nic.inArchivedDossier Goa – A Recusa do Sacrifício InútilAn Imperial Crisis in British India: The Manipur Uprising of 1891The Truth of Babri Mosque"Kolkata (Calcutta) : History"the original"Robert Clive, Baron Clive, 'Clive of India', 1725–1774""The Transformation from a Pre-Colonial to a Colonial Order: The Case of India"10.2307/25955872595587A versatile geniusArchived10.1109/MWSYM.1997.602854"Rabindranath Tagore on Education"the original"Essay on 'Derozio and the Young Bengal Movement'"Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation"Plague"the originalPopulation Growth and Land Use"Reintegrating India with the World Economy""Census Of India 1931"A history of modern India, 1480–1950"'India's well-timed diversification of army helped democracy' | Business Standard News"Bal Gangadhar Tilak: Struggle for Swaraj"Participants from the Indian subcontinent in the First World War""Commonwealth War Graves Commission Annual Report 2007–2008 Online"the original1462689197110.1017/s0010417500016534178920Eurocentrism: a marxian critical realist critique"Ranjit Guha, "On Some Aspects of Historiography of Colonial India""10.2307/2168385216838510.7202/016593ar"Harvard scholar says the idea of India dates to a much earlier time than the British or the Mughals""In The Footsteps of Pilgrims""India's spiritual landscape: The heavens and the earth""India: A Sacred Geography by Diana L Eck – review"Modern India: The Origins of an Asian Democracy10.2307/21694222169422964322464"The Indian Subcontinent and 'Out of Africa 1'"254043308Encyclopedia of World ReligionsThe Evolution and History of Human Populations in South Asia: Inter-disciplinary Studies in Archaeology, Biological Anthropology, Linguistics and Genetics"The Early Paleolithic of the Indian Subcontinent: Hominin Colonization, Dispersals and Occupation History"Ancient Indian History and CivilizationAncient Indian Social History: Some Interpretationsthe originalIndia Before EuropeA Concise History of Modern India"The beginning of the historical period, c. 500–150 BCE"full textA History of Indiathe originalexcerpt and text searchexcerptexcerptAn Economic History of India: From Pre-Colonial Times to 1991excerpt and text searchexcerpt and text searchIndia as known to the ancient world10.1111/j.1468-0289.1985.tb00391.x2597191onlineThe History of India, as told by its own historians. The Muhammadan Periodonline editionHans William Brown research collection on 19th-century missionary work in India, 1882–1932, Ms. Coll. 1033, Kislak Center for Special Collections, Rare Books and Manuscripts, University of Pennsylvaniaee