How to answer “Have you ever been terminated?” Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to explain why I don't have a degreeShould I mention to have been previously “rejected”?Laid off 3 months into first job out of college. How to present this to prospective employers?How to answer questions about desired salary?Is it appropriate to mention how long you've been applying at the same company?Is it ever worth asking a question if you know the answer is “no”?How can I find out whether I have a blot on my HR record?How to handle interview questions about job on which I was unfairly terminated?How to explain why I know the company's employee conditions?Fraudulent job applications with no discernible purpose. Have you ever seen them? Any idea of the motive?

Simplicity of the roots of a minimal polynomial

How can I (re)show post-installation notes?

Apollo command module space walk?

Why didn't this character "real die" when they blew their stack out in Altered Carbon?

How to react to hostile behavior from a senior developer?

How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?

Storing hydrofluoric acid before the invention of plastics

Fundamental Solution of the Pell Equation

Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages

Why do we bend a book to keep it straight?

What does the "x" in "x86" represent?

Check which numbers satisfy the condition [A*B*C = A! + B! + C!]

How to bypass password on Windows XP account?

Is pollution the main cause of Notre Dame Cathedral's deterioration?

What does an IRS interview request entail when called in to verify expenses for a sole proprietor small business?

What is the role of the transistor and diode in a soft start circuit?

What is a non-alternating simple group with big order, but relatively few conjugacy classes?

How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?

How to answer "Have you ever been terminated?"

What's the purpose of writing one's academic biography in the third person?

Resolving to minmaj7

Using audio cues to encourage good posture

How discoverable are IPv6 addresses and AAAA names by potential attackers?

Why is my conclusion inconsistent with the van't Hoff equation?



How to answer “Have you ever been terminated?”



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to explain why I don't have a degreeShould I mention to have been previously “rejected”?Laid off 3 months into first job out of college. How to present this to prospective employers?How to answer questions about desired salary?Is it appropriate to mention how long you've been applying at the same company?Is it ever worth asking a question if you know the answer is “no”?How can I find out whether I have a blot on my HR record?How to handle interview questions about job on which I was unfairly terminated?How to explain why I know the company's employee conditions?Fraudulent job applications with no discernible purpose. Have you ever seen them? Any idea of the motive?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








10















I'm filling out a job application that asks the question "Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?"



I did get fired from a job back in 1998. It was my first high-profile tech job after I graduated high school, and I was still very much a smug kid with a crappy work ethic. I antagonized my boss whom I despised, and I naively believed that finding work was pitifully easy since this was the height of the dot-com bubble at the time.



I won't even try to spin this as "not my fault" because it totally was. I'm perfectly comfortable owning up to the mistakes I made because that was over 20 years ago and I was a literal teenager at the time. I've done a lot of growing up since then I'm a different person now than I was back then.



On the one hand, I want to be honest and forthright on a job application. On the other hand, HR departments often use this question to immediately reject potential applicants without consideration of the reasons.



I've had a long and successful career since then and I don't feel that being fired an entire lifetime ago is relevant to the position I'm applying for now. I'd be fine with engaging the discussion in an interview if asked, but there is no room in a 400 character text box for that kind of nuance. The job I got fired from isn't on my resume because it was so long ago, and the company doesn't even exist anymore.



I'm looking for work because I've recently been laid off from a job I've had for 10 years due to an acquisition and workforce reduction. It was made clear to me by my former boss and my termination paperwork that the layoff is in no way related to performance or disciplinary reasons. In fact, my most recent performance review was positively stellar. But a layoff is already a small hill I have to climb and I don't want to further taint an application to a potential employer with something that shouldn't even matter anymore.



Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions? Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?



If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?










share|improve this question

















  • 2





    I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.

    – newguy
    4 hours ago







  • 1





    I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.

    – NotMe
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.

    – David K
    4 hours ago












  • finding work was pitifully easy then! :)

    – Fattie
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.

    – Fattie
    2 hours ago

















10















I'm filling out a job application that asks the question "Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?"



I did get fired from a job back in 1998. It was my first high-profile tech job after I graduated high school, and I was still very much a smug kid with a crappy work ethic. I antagonized my boss whom I despised, and I naively believed that finding work was pitifully easy since this was the height of the dot-com bubble at the time.



I won't even try to spin this as "not my fault" because it totally was. I'm perfectly comfortable owning up to the mistakes I made because that was over 20 years ago and I was a literal teenager at the time. I've done a lot of growing up since then I'm a different person now than I was back then.



On the one hand, I want to be honest and forthright on a job application. On the other hand, HR departments often use this question to immediately reject potential applicants without consideration of the reasons.



I've had a long and successful career since then and I don't feel that being fired an entire lifetime ago is relevant to the position I'm applying for now. I'd be fine with engaging the discussion in an interview if asked, but there is no room in a 400 character text box for that kind of nuance. The job I got fired from isn't on my resume because it was so long ago, and the company doesn't even exist anymore.



I'm looking for work because I've recently been laid off from a job I've had for 10 years due to an acquisition and workforce reduction. It was made clear to me by my former boss and my termination paperwork that the layoff is in no way related to performance or disciplinary reasons. In fact, my most recent performance review was positively stellar. But a layoff is already a small hill I have to climb and I don't want to further taint an application to a potential employer with something that shouldn't even matter anymore.



Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions? Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?



If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?










share|improve this question

















  • 2





    I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.

    – newguy
    4 hours ago







  • 1





    I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.

    – NotMe
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.

    – David K
    4 hours ago












  • finding work was pitifully easy then! :)

    – Fattie
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.

    – Fattie
    2 hours ago













10












10








10








I'm filling out a job application that asks the question "Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?"



I did get fired from a job back in 1998. It was my first high-profile tech job after I graduated high school, and I was still very much a smug kid with a crappy work ethic. I antagonized my boss whom I despised, and I naively believed that finding work was pitifully easy since this was the height of the dot-com bubble at the time.



I won't even try to spin this as "not my fault" because it totally was. I'm perfectly comfortable owning up to the mistakes I made because that was over 20 years ago and I was a literal teenager at the time. I've done a lot of growing up since then I'm a different person now than I was back then.



On the one hand, I want to be honest and forthright on a job application. On the other hand, HR departments often use this question to immediately reject potential applicants without consideration of the reasons.



I've had a long and successful career since then and I don't feel that being fired an entire lifetime ago is relevant to the position I'm applying for now. I'd be fine with engaging the discussion in an interview if asked, but there is no room in a 400 character text box for that kind of nuance. The job I got fired from isn't on my resume because it was so long ago, and the company doesn't even exist anymore.



I'm looking for work because I've recently been laid off from a job I've had for 10 years due to an acquisition and workforce reduction. It was made clear to me by my former boss and my termination paperwork that the layoff is in no way related to performance or disciplinary reasons. In fact, my most recent performance review was positively stellar. But a layoff is already a small hill I have to climb and I don't want to further taint an application to a potential employer with something that shouldn't even matter anymore.



Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions? Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?



If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?










share|improve this question














I'm filling out a job application that asks the question "Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?"



I did get fired from a job back in 1998. It was my first high-profile tech job after I graduated high school, and I was still very much a smug kid with a crappy work ethic. I antagonized my boss whom I despised, and I naively believed that finding work was pitifully easy since this was the height of the dot-com bubble at the time.



I won't even try to spin this as "not my fault" because it totally was. I'm perfectly comfortable owning up to the mistakes I made because that was over 20 years ago and I was a literal teenager at the time. I've done a lot of growing up since then I'm a different person now than I was back then.



On the one hand, I want to be honest and forthright on a job application. On the other hand, HR departments often use this question to immediately reject potential applicants without consideration of the reasons.



I've had a long and successful career since then and I don't feel that being fired an entire lifetime ago is relevant to the position I'm applying for now. I'd be fine with engaging the discussion in an interview if asked, but there is no room in a 400 character text box for that kind of nuance. The job I got fired from isn't on my resume because it was so long ago, and the company doesn't even exist anymore.



I'm looking for work because I've recently been laid off from a job I've had for 10 years due to an acquisition and workforce reduction. It was made clear to me by my former boss and my termination paperwork that the layoff is in no way related to performance or disciplinary reasons. In fact, my most recent performance review was positively stellar. But a layoff is already a small hill I have to climb and I don't want to further taint an application to a potential employer with something that shouldn't even matter anymore.



Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions? Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?



If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?







interviewing job-search new-job hiring-process human-resources






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 4 hours ago









Wes SayeedWes Sayeed

763149




763149







  • 2





    I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.

    – newguy
    4 hours ago







  • 1





    I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.

    – NotMe
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.

    – David K
    4 hours ago












  • finding work was pitifully easy then! :)

    – Fattie
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.

    – Fattie
    2 hours ago












  • 2





    I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.

    – newguy
    4 hours ago







  • 1





    I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.

    – NotMe
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.

    – David K
    4 hours ago












  • finding work was pitifully easy then! :)

    – Fattie
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.

    – Fattie
    2 hours ago







2




2





I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.

– newguy
4 hours ago






I wouldn't mention it if there was no paperwork or way to find out about it. It will affect my chances of getting the job.

– newguy
4 hours ago





1




1





I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.

– NotMe
4 hours ago





I know we always say to be honest, but sometimes there is a point where too much honesty is in no one's interest. Ignore it.

– NotMe
4 hours ago




1




1





You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.

– David K
4 hours ago






You gave us two paragraphs describing why you were fired, which is only ~630 characters. I was able to pare that down and add a sentence or two about growing up and receiving a stellar performance review at your 10-year job, and still came in under 400 characters. If you decided to mention this, you should be able to write up something concise for that text box.

– David K
4 hours ago














finding work was pitifully easy then! :)

– Fattie
2 hours ago





finding work was pitifully easy then! :)

– Fattie
2 hours ago




1




1





Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.

– Fattie
2 hours ago





Oh no, this is going to be one of those "controversial" questions. Notice mcK's answer already has equal up and down votes.

– Fattie
2 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















11














It would be understandable to say no, because there's probably no way anyone would be able to find out or verify you were fired over 20 years ago from a non-existent company.



The problem with saying "no" is that it is not the truth. And not telling the truth seems to bother you, which is not an uncommon response.



This is a personal ethical choice to be sure, but you'll also have to carry around the worry that someone someday will find out.



There's no way to say for sure what any particular company's policy is with a question like that. In my experience companies usually take context into consideration. The fact that they provide 400 words for this (as opposed to a simple checkbox) does seem to indicate they are doing so. The company would likely not go through the trouble of handling an application if they blindly rejected anyone who had been terminated.



I would say yes, and also briefly explain that it was 20 years ago, and served as a wake-up call and important learning lesson. You can turn this into a positive.



A company who would reject you based on that answer is probably not one you'd want to work for.






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.

    – Wes Sayeed
    2 hours ago











  • And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later

    – George M
    43 mins ago











  • "Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.

    – TehShrike
    28 mins ago












  • @WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.

    – mcknz
    10 mins ago


















2














It’s ethical to be concerned about how to answer it and honestly my first thought was no one will fault you on principle even if it were provable. But as I thought about it, it occurred to me that 400 characters may be the perfect space. Nuance is not for the application process. If you had eight paragraphs to explain, they’d skip you before you reached your conclusion. Application is about not getting weeded out and making an impression. You might even do yourself a favor by answering affirmatively.



By analogy, say you go out for pizza. The order is taken, completed in reasonable time and a good pizza overall. Does that experience stand out over the last dozen times you’ve had pizza? If they burned your pizza, apologized, got your drinks and an appetizer while they did it right and didn’t charge you, are they a bad restaurant or a great one?




Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?



Yes, once as a teen--and it was one of the single most valuable
lessons of my (early?) career. I’ve since learned my confidence was
not misplaced, but how I interacted with others was forever shaped for
the better on that day.




Ultimately, anything is a gamble. A simple “no” is safe, but leaves you no more intriguing than the other dozen applicants who answered the same. Turning that one, long ago shortcoming into a strength usually doesn’t get to happen until the interview.






share|improve this answer























  • This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.

    – thursdaysgeek
    37 mins ago


















1














To expand on mcknz's answer. It seems like there's mainly 2 options




  • Yes, with an attempted brief explanation. As you mentioned, this may immediately disqualify you. And also as you mentioned, it's not
    like an interview where you can be personable.


  • Lie. As bad as it sounds, I'd consider this the best choice. Not only because you won't get caught but simply because something
    like this from 20 years ago is just not relevant.

The choice is now up to you. Can you morally lie on a job application? Different people have different morals. I would have no problem with it.



If it makes you uncomfortable:



  1. Tell the truth

  2. Explain the best that you can

  3. Hope for the best.

Good luck to you :)






share|improve this answer






























    0














    It's very likely that, in your resume or application you surely don't even list your entire work history (like 25 years worth) but only the last, say, 10 years. Is that right?



    I would say with such a minor piece of ancient history - which is well outside your resume - it would be irrelevant.



    To put in to light just how long ago this was, do you truly even remember anything about the job?



    One person's name, anything? Your desk? The product? Where you had lunch? Anything?



    Is it even the case that you were literally, exactly, and legally "terminated"? Do you have any paperwork or evidence to prove that you were terminated? Were you perhaps asked to leave (was the word "terminated" even used then? People used to just get "fired" or "sacked"!) Can you even remember the full circumstances, paperwork, procedue and anything about the events?



    After long periods of time, five or more years, we generally don't have memories, we just "remember remembering" something. It just becomes "a story".



    Say (for some reason) someone challenged you if you were actually "terminated". (
    "You just claimed you were terminated to appear cool!")



    Could you present the slightest evidence that you were literally terminated?




    Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions?




    The length of the content of your resume; 15 years anyway.




    Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?




    Simply, No you will not.



    You had a part-time job as a teenager and it didn't work out after a couple weeks. It would be .. grandiose .. to describe it as "terminated!"




    If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?




    It's utterly impossible to "explain" it in either way.



    It's a yes/no question. There's no "explaining" such things.






    share|improve this answer

























    • The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.

      – Wes Sayeed
      2 hours ago







    • 1





      Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!

      – Fattie
      2 hours ago












    • More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box

      – George M
      39 mins ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "423"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: false,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134048%2fhow-to-answer-have-you-ever-been-terminated%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown




















    StackExchange.ready(function ()
    $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
    var showEditor = function()
    $("#show-editor-button").hide();
    $("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
    StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
    ;

    var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
    if(useFancy == 'True')
    var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
    var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
    var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

    $(this).loadPopup(
    url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
    loaded: function(popup)
    var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
    var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
    var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

    pTitle.text(popupTitle);
    pBody.html(popupBody);
    pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);

    )
    else
    var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
    if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
    showEditor();


    );
    );






    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    11














    It would be understandable to say no, because there's probably no way anyone would be able to find out or verify you were fired over 20 years ago from a non-existent company.



    The problem with saying "no" is that it is not the truth. And not telling the truth seems to bother you, which is not an uncommon response.



    This is a personal ethical choice to be sure, but you'll also have to carry around the worry that someone someday will find out.



    There's no way to say for sure what any particular company's policy is with a question like that. In my experience companies usually take context into consideration. The fact that they provide 400 words for this (as opposed to a simple checkbox) does seem to indicate they are doing so. The company would likely not go through the trouble of handling an application if they blindly rejected anyone who had been terminated.



    I would say yes, and also briefly explain that it was 20 years ago, and served as a wake-up call and important learning lesson. You can turn this into a positive.



    A company who would reject you based on that answer is probably not one you'd want to work for.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.

      – Wes Sayeed
      2 hours ago











    • And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later

      – George M
      43 mins ago











    • "Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.

      – TehShrike
      28 mins ago












    • @WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.

      – mcknz
      10 mins ago















    11














    It would be understandable to say no, because there's probably no way anyone would be able to find out or verify you were fired over 20 years ago from a non-existent company.



    The problem with saying "no" is that it is not the truth. And not telling the truth seems to bother you, which is not an uncommon response.



    This is a personal ethical choice to be sure, but you'll also have to carry around the worry that someone someday will find out.



    There's no way to say for sure what any particular company's policy is with a question like that. In my experience companies usually take context into consideration. The fact that they provide 400 words for this (as opposed to a simple checkbox) does seem to indicate they are doing so. The company would likely not go through the trouble of handling an application if they blindly rejected anyone who had been terminated.



    I would say yes, and also briefly explain that it was 20 years ago, and served as a wake-up call and important learning lesson. You can turn this into a positive.



    A company who would reject you based on that answer is probably not one you'd want to work for.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.

      – Wes Sayeed
      2 hours ago











    • And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later

      – George M
      43 mins ago











    • "Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.

      – TehShrike
      28 mins ago












    • @WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.

      – mcknz
      10 mins ago













    11












    11








    11







    It would be understandable to say no, because there's probably no way anyone would be able to find out or verify you were fired over 20 years ago from a non-existent company.



    The problem with saying "no" is that it is not the truth. And not telling the truth seems to bother you, which is not an uncommon response.



    This is a personal ethical choice to be sure, but you'll also have to carry around the worry that someone someday will find out.



    There's no way to say for sure what any particular company's policy is with a question like that. In my experience companies usually take context into consideration. The fact that they provide 400 words for this (as opposed to a simple checkbox) does seem to indicate they are doing so. The company would likely not go through the trouble of handling an application if they blindly rejected anyone who had been terminated.



    I would say yes, and also briefly explain that it was 20 years ago, and served as a wake-up call and important learning lesson. You can turn this into a positive.



    A company who would reject you based on that answer is probably not one you'd want to work for.






    share|improve this answer















    It would be understandable to say no, because there's probably no way anyone would be able to find out or verify you were fired over 20 years ago from a non-existent company.



    The problem with saying "no" is that it is not the truth. And not telling the truth seems to bother you, which is not an uncommon response.



    This is a personal ethical choice to be sure, but you'll also have to carry around the worry that someone someday will find out.



    There's no way to say for sure what any particular company's policy is with a question like that. In my experience companies usually take context into consideration. The fact that they provide 400 words for this (as opposed to a simple checkbox) does seem to indicate they are doing so. The company would likely not go through the trouble of handling an application if they blindly rejected anyone who had been terminated.



    I would say yes, and also briefly explain that it was 20 years ago, and served as a wake-up call and important learning lesson. You can turn this into a positive.



    A company who would reject you based on that answer is probably not one you'd want to work for.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 4 mins ago

























    answered 4 hours ago









    mcknzmcknz

    19.5k86380




    19.5k86380







    • 2





      My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.

      – Wes Sayeed
      2 hours ago











    • And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later

      – George M
      43 mins ago











    • "Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.

      – TehShrike
      28 mins ago












    • @WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.

      – mcknz
      10 mins ago












    • 2





      My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.

      – Wes Sayeed
      2 hours ago











    • And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later

      – George M
      43 mins ago











    • "Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.

      – TehShrike
      28 mins ago












    • @WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.

      – mcknz
      10 mins ago







    2




    2





    My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.

    – Wes Sayeed
    2 hours ago





    My only reservation about your answer is the last paragraph. Often times employers go through 3rd parties to harvest applications and pre-screen candidates. This job appears on the company's own web site, but the Apply Now button links to a 3rd party HR firm with this company's branding. If the 3rd party system is set up to auto-reject a candidate based on certain checkboxes being checked, I don't think it says anything about the company one way or the other. I just want my application rejected by a human if that is to be the case, not a machine.

    – Wes Sayeed
    2 hours ago













    And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later

    – George M
    43 mins ago





    And even within a company, the junior HR person who sticks to their checkboxes is not necessarily anyone you would interact with later

    – George M
    43 mins ago













    "Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.

    – TehShrike
    28 mins ago






    "Yes, once back when I was a stupid teenager." – spoken by someone with 20+ years of professional experience, the interviewer may just check "no" on their form if they make the call that it doesn't matter.

    – TehShrike
    28 mins ago














    @WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.

    – mcknz
    10 mins ago





    @WesSayeed understandable -- a lot of times however, you get jobs through referrals and networking, not through application harvesters. With pre-screened processes you can get flagged for many things, including not having the right acronyms on your resume.

    – mcknz
    10 mins ago













    2














    It’s ethical to be concerned about how to answer it and honestly my first thought was no one will fault you on principle even if it were provable. But as I thought about it, it occurred to me that 400 characters may be the perfect space. Nuance is not for the application process. If you had eight paragraphs to explain, they’d skip you before you reached your conclusion. Application is about not getting weeded out and making an impression. You might even do yourself a favor by answering affirmatively.



    By analogy, say you go out for pizza. The order is taken, completed in reasonable time and a good pizza overall. Does that experience stand out over the last dozen times you’ve had pizza? If they burned your pizza, apologized, got your drinks and an appetizer while they did it right and didn’t charge you, are they a bad restaurant or a great one?




    Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?



    Yes, once as a teen--and it was one of the single most valuable
    lessons of my (early?) career. I’ve since learned my confidence was
    not misplaced, but how I interacted with others was forever shaped for
    the better on that day.




    Ultimately, anything is a gamble. A simple “no” is safe, but leaves you no more intriguing than the other dozen applicants who answered the same. Turning that one, long ago shortcoming into a strength usually doesn’t get to happen until the interview.






    share|improve this answer























    • This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.

      – thursdaysgeek
      37 mins ago















    2














    It’s ethical to be concerned about how to answer it and honestly my first thought was no one will fault you on principle even if it were provable. But as I thought about it, it occurred to me that 400 characters may be the perfect space. Nuance is not for the application process. If you had eight paragraphs to explain, they’d skip you before you reached your conclusion. Application is about not getting weeded out and making an impression. You might even do yourself a favor by answering affirmatively.



    By analogy, say you go out for pizza. The order is taken, completed in reasonable time and a good pizza overall. Does that experience stand out over the last dozen times you’ve had pizza? If they burned your pizza, apologized, got your drinks and an appetizer while they did it right and didn’t charge you, are they a bad restaurant or a great one?




    Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?



    Yes, once as a teen--and it was one of the single most valuable
    lessons of my (early?) career. I’ve since learned my confidence was
    not misplaced, but how I interacted with others was forever shaped for
    the better on that day.




    Ultimately, anything is a gamble. A simple “no” is safe, but leaves you no more intriguing than the other dozen applicants who answered the same. Turning that one, long ago shortcoming into a strength usually doesn’t get to happen until the interview.






    share|improve this answer























    • This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.

      – thursdaysgeek
      37 mins ago













    2












    2








    2







    It’s ethical to be concerned about how to answer it and honestly my first thought was no one will fault you on principle even if it were provable. But as I thought about it, it occurred to me that 400 characters may be the perfect space. Nuance is not for the application process. If you had eight paragraphs to explain, they’d skip you before you reached your conclusion. Application is about not getting weeded out and making an impression. You might even do yourself a favor by answering affirmatively.



    By analogy, say you go out for pizza. The order is taken, completed in reasonable time and a good pizza overall. Does that experience stand out over the last dozen times you’ve had pizza? If they burned your pizza, apologized, got your drinks and an appetizer while they did it right and didn’t charge you, are they a bad restaurant or a great one?




    Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?



    Yes, once as a teen--and it was one of the single most valuable
    lessons of my (early?) career. I’ve since learned my confidence was
    not misplaced, but how I interacted with others was forever shaped for
    the better on that day.




    Ultimately, anything is a gamble. A simple “no” is safe, but leaves you no more intriguing than the other dozen applicants who answered the same. Turning that one, long ago shortcoming into a strength usually doesn’t get to happen until the interview.






    share|improve this answer













    It’s ethical to be concerned about how to answer it and honestly my first thought was no one will fault you on principle even if it were provable. But as I thought about it, it occurred to me that 400 characters may be the perfect space. Nuance is not for the application process. If you had eight paragraphs to explain, they’d skip you before you reached your conclusion. Application is about not getting weeded out and making an impression. You might even do yourself a favor by answering affirmatively.



    By analogy, say you go out for pizza. The order is taken, completed in reasonable time and a good pizza overall. Does that experience stand out over the last dozen times you’ve had pizza? If they burned your pizza, apologized, got your drinks and an appetizer while they did it right and didn’t charge you, are they a bad restaurant or a great one?




    Have you ever been terminated or asked to resign from a position in the past?



    Yes, once as a teen--and it was one of the single most valuable
    lessons of my (early?) career. I’ve since learned my confidence was
    not misplaced, but how I interacted with others was forever shaped for
    the better on that day.




    Ultimately, anything is a gamble. A simple “no” is safe, but leaves you no more intriguing than the other dozen applicants who answered the same. Turning that one, long ago shortcoming into a strength usually doesn’t get to happen until the interview.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 2 hours ago









    John SpiegelJohn Spiegel

    1,16729




    1,16729












    • This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.

      – thursdaysgeek
      37 mins ago

















    • This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.

      – thursdaysgeek
      37 mins ago
















    This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.

    – thursdaysgeek
    37 mins ago





    This has a great point - how to turn it into a positive instead of a null.

    – thursdaysgeek
    37 mins ago











    1














    To expand on mcknz's answer. It seems like there's mainly 2 options




    • Yes, with an attempted brief explanation. As you mentioned, this may immediately disqualify you. And also as you mentioned, it's not
      like an interview where you can be personable.


    • Lie. As bad as it sounds, I'd consider this the best choice. Not only because you won't get caught but simply because something
      like this from 20 years ago is just not relevant.

    The choice is now up to you. Can you morally lie on a job application? Different people have different morals. I would have no problem with it.



    If it makes you uncomfortable:



    1. Tell the truth

    2. Explain the best that you can

    3. Hope for the best.

    Good luck to you :)






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      To expand on mcknz's answer. It seems like there's mainly 2 options




      • Yes, with an attempted brief explanation. As you mentioned, this may immediately disqualify you. And also as you mentioned, it's not
        like an interview where you can be personable.


      • Lie. As bad as it sounds, I'd consider this the best choice. Not only because you won't get caught but simply because something
        like this from 20 years ago is just not relevant.

      The choice is now up to you. Can you morally lie on a job application? Different people have different morals. I would have no problem with it.



      If it makes you uncomfortable:



      1. Tell the truth

      2. Explain the best that you can

      3. Hope for the best.

      Good luck to you :)






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        To expand on mcknz's answer. It seems like there's mainly 2 options




        • Yes, with an attempted brief explanation. As you mentioned, this may immediately disqualify you. And also as you mentioned, it's not
          like an interview where you can be personable.


        • Lie. As bad as it sounds, I'd consider this the best choice. Not only because you won't get caught but simply because something
          like this from 20 years ago is just not relevant.

        The choice is now up to you. Can you morally lie on a job application? Different people have different morals. I would have no problem with it.



        If it makes you uncomfortable:



        1. Tell the truth

        2. Explain the best that you can

        3. Hope for the best.

        Good luck to you :)






        share|improve this answer













        To expand on mcknz's answer. It seems like there's mainly 2 options




        • Yes, with an attempted brief explanation. As you mentioned, this may immediately disqualify you. And also as you mentioned, it's not
          like an interview where you can be personable.


        • Lie. As bad as it sounds, I'd consider this the best choice. Not only because you won't get caught but simply because something
          like this from 20 years ago is just not relevant.

        The choice is now up to you. Can you morally lie on a job application? Different people have different morals. I would have no problem with it.



        If it makes you uncomfortable:



        1. Tell the truth

        2. Explain the best that you can

        3. Hope for the best.

        Good luck to you :)







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        CrazyPasteCrazyPaste

        54929




        54929





















            0














            It's very likely that, in your resume or application you surely don't even list your entire work history (like 25 years worth) but only the last, say, 10 years. Is that right?



            I would say with such a minor piece of ancient history - which is well outside your resume - it would be irrelevant.



            To put in to light just how long ago this was, do you truly even remember anything about the job?



            One person's name, anything? Your desk? The product? Where you had lunch? Anything?



            Is it even the case that you were literally, exactly, and legally "terminated"? Do you have any paperwork or evidence to prove that you were terminated? Were you perhaps asked to leave (was the word "terminated" even used then? People used to just get "fired" or "sacked"!) Can you even remember the full circumstances, paperwork, procedue and anything about the events?



            After long periods of time, five or more years, we generally don't have memories, we just "remember remembering" something. It just becomes "a story".



            Say (for some reason) someone challenged you if you were actually "terminated". (
            "You just claimed you were terminated to appear cool!")



            Could you present the slightest evidence that you were literally terminated?




            Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions?




            The length of the content of your resume; 15 years anyway.




            Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?




            Simply, No you will not.



            You had a part-time job as a teenager and it didn't work out after a couple weeks. It would be .. grandiose .. to describe it as "terminated!"




            If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?




            It's utterly impossible to "explain" it in either way.



            It's a yes/no question. There's no "explaining" such things.






            share|improve this answer

























            • The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.

              – Wes Sayeed
              2 hours ago







            • 1





              Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!

              – Fattie
              2 hours ago












            • More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box

              – George M
              39 mins ago















            0














            It's very likely that, in your resume or application you surely don't even list your entire work history (like 25 years worth) but only the last, say, 10 years. Is that right?



            I would say with such a minor piece of ancient history - which is well outside your resume - it would be irrelevant.



            To put in to light just how long ago this was, do you truly even remember anything about the job?



            One person's name, anything? Your desk? The product? Where you had lunch? Anything?



            Is it even the case that you were literally, exactly, and legally "terminated"? Do you have any paperwork or evidence to prove that you were terminated? Were you perhaps asked to leave (was the word "terminated" even used then? People used to just get "fired" or "sacked"!) Can you even remember the full circumstances, paperwork, procedue and anything about the events?



            After long periods of time, five or more years, we generally don't have memories, we just "remember remembering" something. It just becomes "a story".



            Say (for some reason) someone challenged you if you were actually "terminated". (
            "You just claimed you were terminated to appear cool!")



            Could you present the slightest evidence that you were literally terminated?




            Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions?




            The length of the content of your resume; 15 years anyway.




            Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?




            Simply, No you will not.



            You had a part-time job as a teenager and it didn't work out after a couple weeks. It would be .. grandiose .. to describe it as "terminated!"




            If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?




            It's utterly impossible to "explain" it in either way.



            It's a yes/no question. There's no "explaining" such things.






            share|improve this answer

























            • The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.

              – Wes Sayeed
              2 hours ago







            • 1





              Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!

              – Fattie
              2 hours ago












            • More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box

              – George M
              39 mins ago













            0












            0








            0







            It's very likely that, in your resume or application you surely don't even list your entire work history (like 25 years worth) but only the last, say, 10 years. Is that right?



            I would say with such a minor piece of ancient history - which is well outside your resume - it would be irrelevant.



            To put in to light just how long ago this was, do you truly even remember anything about the job?



            One person's name, anything? Your desk? The product? Where you had lunch? Anything?



            Is it even the case that you were literally, exactly, and legally "terminated"? Do you have any paperwork or evidence to prove that you were terminated? Were you perhaps asked to leave (was the word "terminated" even used then? People used to just get "fired" or "sacked"!) Can you even remember the full circumstances, paperwork, procedue and anything about the events?



            After long periods of time, five or more years, we generally don't have memories, we just "remember remembering" something. It just becomes "a story".



            Say (for some reason) someone challenged you if you were actually "terminated". (
            "You just claimed you were terminated to appear cool!")



            Could you present the slightest evidence that you were literally terminated?




            Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions?




            The length of the content of your resume; 15 years anyway.




            Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?




            Simply, No you will not.



            You had a part-time job as a teenager and it didn't work out after a couple weeks. It would be .. grandiose .. to describe it as "terminated!"




            If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?




            It's utterly impossible to "explain" it in either way.



            It's a yes/no question. There's no "explaining" such things.






            share|improve this answer















            It's very likely that, in your resume or application you surely don't even list your entire work history (like 25 years worth) but only the last, say, 10 years. Is that right?



            I would say with such a minor piece of ancient history - which is well outside your resume - it would be irrelevant.



            To put in to light just how long ago this was, do you truly even remember anything about the job?



            One person's name, anything? Your desk? The product? Where you had lunch? Anything?



            Is it even the case that you were literally, exactly, and legally "terminated"? Do you have any paperwork or evidence to prove that you were terminated? Were you perhaps asked to leave (was the word "terminated" even used then? People used to just get "fired" or "sacked"!) Can you even remember the full circumstances, paperwork, procedue and anything about the events?



            After long periods of time, five or more years, we generally don't have memories, we just "remember remembering" something. It just becomes "a story".



            Say (for some reason) someone challenged you if you were actually "terminated". (
            "You just claimed you were terminated to appear cool!")



            Could you present the slightest evidence that you were literally terminated?




            Is there an acceptable expiration date on such questions?




            The length of the content of your resume; 15 years anyway.




            Will I be branded a liar if I answer no?




            Simply, No you will not.



            You had a part-time job as a teenager and it didn't work out after a couple weeks. It would be .. grandiose .. to describe it as "terminated!"




            If I answer yes, how could I explain it succinctly, and do HR departments typically consider those explanations when screening applicants?




            It's utterly impossible to "explain" it in either way.



            It's a yes/no question. There's no "explaining" such things.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 2 hours ago

























            answered 2 hours ago









            FattieFattie

            14.3k62545




            14.3k62545












            • The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.

              – Wes Sayeed
              2 hours ago







            • 1





              Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!

              – Fattie
              2 hours ago












            • More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box

              – George M
              39 mins ago

















            • The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.

              – Wes Sayeed
              2 hours ago







            • 1





              Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!

              – Fattie
              2 hours ago












            • More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box

              – George M
              39 mins ago
















            The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.

            – Wes Sayeed
            2 hours ago






            The answer to all of your questions is yes. I remember the job, the names of my coworkers, even the address of the building, and I'm sure I still have my termination paperwork in an old box somewhere. It was not a part-time job. It was a 40-hour, full-time position that I basically pissed away. Also, I was 19.

            – Wes Sayeed
            2 hours ago





            1




            1





            Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!

            – Fattie
            2 hours ago






            Hey Wes - My God, that's amazing, I was drunk that entire decade :) Well: you can take my advice as general. The short answer then to your question - it can only be one man's opinion - is that it's far too long ago and too minor to mention in the context. (I'd just be annoyed if I had to read something like that - you know?) One man's take! Good luck!!!

            – Fattie
            2 hours ago














            More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box

            – George M
            39 mins ago





            More to the point, is there any reason to include this job in your resume if it was 20 years ago? Did you do anything so staggeringly original that you risk not being hired because they don't realize you're the author of the famous ---? Then you should leave the entire job off. There, no more need to worry about that box

            – George M
            39 mins ago

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134048%2fhow-to-answer-have-you-ever-been-terminated%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown











            Popular posts from this blog

            Is it wise to focus on putting odd beats on left when playing double bass drums?What does the tie across other different notes mean?How to improve right hand picking/strumming technique for electric and acoustic guitar?How fast is the BPM should you start to use double bass pedal?Alternative or more advanced methods for counting rhythmsLost direction in practicing drumsIs there any way at all to tell if these measures are 6/4 vs. 3/2?Why is alberti bass so tiring?How does 'meter' differ from 'rhythm' in music?Rhythm question about piano sheet notationWhy is Bach's Cello Suite 1 written in 16th notes

            History of India Contents Prehistoric era (until c. 3300 BCE) Bronze Age – "First urbanisation" (c. 3300 – c. 1800 BCE) Climate change, de-urbanisation, and Indo-Aryan migrations (c.1800 – 1500 BCE) Iron Age - Vedic period (c. 1500 – c. 600 BCE) "Second urbanisation" (c. 600 – c. 200 BCE) Classical to early medieval periods (c. 200 BCE – c. 1200 CE) Late medieval period (c. 1200 – 1526 CE) Early modern period (c. 1526–1858 CE) Modern period and independence (after c. 1850 CE) Historiography See also References Further reading External links Navigation menureviewedee[update]The crisisThe Evolution and History of Human Populations in South Asia: Inter-disciplinary Studies in Archaeology, Biological Anthropology, Linguistics and GeneticsThe Ancient Indus: Urbanism, Economy, and Society"Indus River Valley Civilizations"The Ancient Indus: Urbanism, Economy, and Society"India before the British: The Mughal Empire and its Rivals, 1526–1857"Why Europe Grew Rich and Asia Did Not: Global Economic Divergence, 1600–1850Development Centre Studies The World Economy Historical Statistics: Historical StatisticsDeveloping cultures: case studiesEthnic Groups of South Asia and the Pacific: An Encyclopedia: An Encyclopedia"Indian Economy During British Rule""Economic Impact of the British Rule in India | Indian History"The Bone Readers: Science and Politics in Human Origins Research"Out of Africa: new hypotheses and evidence for the dispersal of Homo sapiens along the Indian Ocean rim"10.3109/0301446100363924920334598"Genetic and archaeological perspectives on the initial modern human colonization of southern Asia"2013PNAS..11010699M10.1073/pnas.1306043110369678523754394"Edakkal Caves|Places Around in Wayanad"Protecting megaliths to keep history alive The Hindu daily"Archaeologists rock solid behind Edakkal Cave"The Global Prehistory of Human Migration"Indus Valley 2,000 years older than thought"the original"Stepwells -Cosmology of Subterranean Architecture as seen in Adalaj"A History of Ancient and Early medieval India : from the Stone Age to the 12th century"Stone celts in Harappa"the original"Peoples and languages in pre-islamic Indus valley"the original"The Sindhi language"the originalThe Aryan chromosome"Fluvial landscapes of the Harappan Civilization"2012PNAS..109E1688G10.1073/pnas.1112743109338705422645375"Is River Ghaggar, Saraswati? Geochemical Constraints""An Ancient Civilization, Upended by Climate Change""Huge Ancient Civilization's Collapse Explained"2003GeoRL..30.1425S10.1029/2002GL0168222006QSRv...25.1283M10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.10.0122011QuInt.229..140M10.1016/j.quaint.2009.11.012Climate Change and the Course of Global History: A Rough JourneyA History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th CenturyA History of Ancient and Mediaeval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th CenturyAntennae SwordA History of IndiaA History of IndiaAn Introduction to Hinduism"India: The Late 2nd Millennium and the Reemergence of Urbanism"The Coinage of Ancient IndiaA Sanskrit reader: with vocabulary and notesPedigree: the origins of words from nature"Early Sanskritization. Origins and Development of the Kuru State"10.11588/ejvs.1995.4.823The Sanskrit epics, Part 2The City in South AsiaThe UpanishadsAn Introduction to HinduismReligions of the World, Second Edition: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Beliefs and PracticesA History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th CenturyEarly India: From the Origins to AD 1300Republics in ancient Indiapp. 83ff"Magadha Empire""Lumbini Development Trust: Restoring the Lumbini Garden"the originalThe great armies of antiquityarchived"The Achaemenid Persian Empire (550–330 B.C.)""East–West Orientation of Historical Empires"1076-156X"Dinner on the Grand Trunk Road"10.2307/32502263250226"Silappathikaram Tamil Literature"the originalManimekalai – English transliteration of Tamil originalIndian Temple Architecture: Form and Transformation : the Karṇāṭa Drāviḍa Tradition, 7th to 13th CenturiesBuddhist ArchitectureA History of India"The World Economy (GDP) : Historical Statistics by Professor Angus Maddison"The World Economy – Volume 1: A Millennial Perspective and Volume 2: Historical Statistics10.2307/32502140004-36483250214A Comprehensive History of India: Volume 2Between the Empires: Society in India, 300 to 400Emergence of Viṣṇu and Śiva Images in India: Numismatic and Sculptural Evidence"Parthian Pair of Earrings"the originalThe Medical Times and Gazette, Volume 1Greatest emporium in the worldThe Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BCBuddhist Records of the Western WorldArchaeology in Soviet Central AsiaThe Grandeur of Gandhara: The Ancient Buddhist Civilization of the Swat, Peshawar, Kabul and Indus ValleysIndian Sculpture: Circa 500 B.C.-A.D. 700"The History of Pakistan: The Kushans"Gupta Dynasty – MSN Encartathe original"India – Historical Setting – The Classical Age – Gupta and Harsha""Gupta Dynasty, Golden Age Of India"the original"The Age of the Guptas and After"the originalNumber Theory and Its History"Gupta dynasty (Indian dynasty)""Gupta dynasty: empire in 4th century"the original"The Story of India – Photo Gallery"The ASI say499315420"Pallava script"p. 145"CNG: eAuction 329. INDIA, Post-Gupta (Ganges Valley). Vardhanas of Thanesar and Kanauj. Harshavardhana. Circa AD 606–647. AR Drachm (13mm, 2.28 g, 1h)""Harsha""Sthanvishvara (historical region, India)""Harsha (Indian emperor)"Shyama Kumar Chattopadhyaya (2000) The Philosophy of Sankar's Advaita VedantaShankara's IntroductionShankara's Introduction19373677Shankara's IntroductionIs The Buddhist 'No-Self' Doctrine Compatible With Pursuing Nirvana?The Seven Spiritual Laws Of YogaIndia: The Ancient Past. A History of the Indian-Subcontinent from 7000 BC to AD 1200The Kashmir Series: Glimpses of Kashmiri Culture – Vivekananda Kendra, Kanyakumari (p. 57).Al-Hind: Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam, 7th–11th CenturiesHistory of GopāchalaLand of Two Rivers: A History of Bengal from the Mahabharata to MujibEuropean Trade and Colonial ConquestA History of IndiaA Comprehensive History Of Ancient India (3 Vol. Set)"The Last Years of Cholas: The decline and fall of a dynasty"the originalFascinating Hindutva: Saffron Politics and Dalit MobilisationGazetteer of the province of OudhAl- Hind: The slave kings and the Islamic conquest. 2"Shahi Family"The Cambridge history of Islam"Ameer Nasir-ood-deen Subooktugeen"Gazetteer of the Attock District, 1930, Part 1Land of seven rivers: History of India's GeographyTemple Desecration and Indo-Muslim StatesIslam in South Asia: A Short HistoryBeyond Orientalism: The Work of Wilhelm Halbfass and Its Impact on Indian and Cross-cultural StudiesThe Making of Terrorism in Pakistan: Historical and Social Roots of ExtremismOrnament in Indian ArchitectureA historical review of Hindu India: 300 B.C. to 1200 A.D."Indian States and Union Territories"Islam in South Asia: A Short HistoryA Brief History of the Indian PeoplesThe Modern ReviewDelhi Sultanate"Battuta's Travels: Delhi, capital of Muslim India"the original"Timur – conquest of India"the originalIndia HandbookBhaktiThe Four Denomination of Hinduism10.1007/s11407-008-9049-925691067"Vijayanagara Research Project::Elephant Stables"10.2307/26465262646526Historical Dictionary of the TamilsBihar General Knowledge DigestMapping Bihar: From Medieval to Modern TimesPopular Literature and Pre-modern Societies in South AsiaA manual of the Kistna district in the presidency of MadrasAncient Indian History and CivilizationFragmented Memories: Struggling to be Tai-Ahom in India"The Islamic World to 1600: Rise of the Great Islamic Empires (The Mughal Empire)"the originalDynasties: A Global History of Power, 1300–1800, p. 105"Whose fort is it anyway"10.1111/0020-8833.000532600793Development Centre Studies The World Economy Historical Statistics: Historical Statistics"India's Deindustrialization in the 18th and 19th Centuries"The Mughal Empire, p. 190"The Long Globalization and Textile Producers in India"The Mughal World: Life in India's Last Golden AgeAurangzeb: The Life and Legacy of India's Most Controversial KingIn the Shadow of the Taj: A Portrait of Agra"Iran in the Age of the Raj"p. 8610.2307/20539802053980Delhi, the Capital of IndiaAn Advanced History of Modern India"Journal of the Tanjore Maharaja Serfoji's Sarasvati Mahal Library"The Rediscovery of India: A New SubcontinentIslamic Renaissance In South Asia (1707–1867) : The Role Of Shah Waliallah & His SuccessorsAn Advanced History of Modern IndiaThe Great Maratha Mahadaji Scindia"Full text of "Selections from the papers of Lord Metcalfe; late governor-general of India, governor of Jamaica, and governor-general of Canada""The Discovery Of IndiaThe Sacred City of the Hindus: An Account of Benares in Ancient and Modern TimesResurrecting Banaras: Urban Space, Architecture and Religious BoundariesFaith & Philosophy of Sikhism"Missiles mainstay of Pak's N-arsenal"History Modern India By S.N. Sen"Sirajuddaula"ArchivedLongman History & Civics (Dual Government in Bengal)Madhya Pradesh National Means-Cum-Merit Scholarship Exam (Warren Hasting's system of Dual Government)A Military History of Britain: from 1775 to the PresentIndian Cultural Heritage Perspective For TourismHindu Rulers, Muslim Subjects: Islam, Rights, and the History of KashmirIndian HistoryAn Atlas and Survey of South Asian HistoryAn Historical Account of the British Trade Over the Caspian SeaIndian Merchants and Eurasian Trade, 1600–1750The Indian diaspora in Central Asia and its trade, 1550–1900From Constantinople to the home of Omar Khayyam: travels in Transcaucasia and northern Persia for historic and literary researchA journey from Bengal to England: through the northern part of India, Kashmire, Afghanistan, and Persia, and into Russia, by the Caspian-SeaA Second Journey through Persia, Armenia, and Asia Minor, to Constantinople, between the Years 1810 and 1816Reports from the consuls of the United States, 1887Portugal and its Empire, 1250–1800 (Collected Essays in Memory of Glenn J. Ames).: Portuguese Studies Review, Vol. 17, No. 1The Dutch Power in Kerala, 1729–1758http://mod.nic.inArchivedDossier Goa – A Recusa do Sacrifício InútilAn Imperial Crisis in British India: The Manipur Uprising of 1891The Truth of Babri Mosque"Kolkata (Calcutta) : History"the original"Robert Clive, Baron Clive, 'Clive of India', 1725–1774""The Transformation from a Pre-Colonial to a Colonial Order: The Case of India"10.2307/25955872595587A versatile geniusArchived10.1109/MWSYM.1997.602854"Rabindranath Tagore on Education"the original"Essay on 'Derozio and the Young Bengal Movement'"Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation"Plague"the originalPopulation Growth and Land Use"Reintegrating India with the World Economy""Census Of India 1931"A history of modern India, 1480–1950"'India's well-timed diversification of army helped democracy' | Business Standard News"Bal Gangadhar Tilak: Struggle for Swaraj"Participants from the Indian subcontinent in the First World War""Commonwealth War Graves Commission Annual Report 2007–2008 Online"the original1462689197110.1017/s0010417500016534178920Eurocentrism: a marxian critical realist critique"Ranjit Guha, "On Some Aspects of Historiography of Colonial India""10.2307/2168385216838510.7202/016593ar"Harvard scholar says the idea of India dates to a much earlier time than the British or the Mughals""In The Footsteps of Pilgrims""India's spiritual landscape: The heavens and the earth""India: A Sacred Geography by Diana L Eck – review"Modern India: The Origins of an Asian Democracy10.2307/21694222169422964322464"The Indian Subcontinent and 'Out of Africa 1'"254043308Encyclopedia of World ReligionsThe Evolution and History of Human Populations in South Asia: Inter-disciplinary Studies in Archaeology, Biological Anthropology, Linguistics and Genetics"The Early Paleolithic of the Indian Subcontinent: Hominin Colonization, Dispersals and Occupation History"Ancient Indian History and CivilizationAncient Indian Social History: Some Interpretationsthe originalIndia Before EuropeA Concise History of Modern India"The beginning of the historical period, c. 500–150 BCE"full textA History of Indiathe originalexcerpt and text searchexcerptexcerptAn Economic History of India: From Pre-Colonial Times to 1991excerpt and text searchexcerpt and text searchIndia as known to the ancient world10.1111/j.1468-0289.1985.tb00391.x2597191onlineThe History of India, as told by its own historians. The Muhammadan Periodonline editionHans William Brown research collection on 19th-century missionary work in India, 1882–1932, Ms. Coll. 1033, Kislak Center for Special Collections, Rare Books and Manuscripts, University of Pennsylvaniaee

            map list to bin numbersquantilization (if that is a word)Map efficiently over duplicates in listGenerating a list of cubefree numbersIs there an equivalent to MATLAB's linspace?Convert a list of hexadecimal numbers to decimalTaking one list Mod a second listlist of items and group of alternative itemsHow find numbers in this list of inequalities?Selecting list entries with a True False index list of similar lengthReplace element in array by checking condition in another listAttempting to fill a table with the number of elements in each bin and make a table with the elements in the bins?