Why can methods be overriden but attributes can't?What is reflection and why is it useful?What is a serialVersionUID and why should I use it?Understanding Python super() with __init__() methodsHow to know if an object has an attribute in PythonWhy is subtracting these two times (in 1927) giving a strange result?Why don't Java's +=, -=, *=, /= compound assignment operators require casting?Why is char[] preferred over String for passwords?Why is it faster to process a sorted array than an unsorted array?Why not inherit from List<T>?Why is printing “B” dramatically slower than printing “#”?
Is exact Kanji stroke length important?
What does "I’d sit this one out, Cap," imply or mean in the context?
Class Action - which options I have?
Risk of infection at the gym?
Did Dumbledore lie to Harry about how long he had James Potter's invisibility cloak when he was examining it? If so, why?
Lay out the Carpet
How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?
For a non-Jew, is there a punishment for not observing the 7 Noahide Laws?
How did Arya survive the stabbing?
Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?
Why didn't Theresa May consult with Parliament before negotiating a deal with the EU?
Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!
What is the best translation for "slot" in the context of multiplayer video games?
How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?
CREATE opcode: what does it really do?
Do the temporary hit points from Reckless Abandon stack if I make multiple attacks on my turn?
Why, precisely, is argon used in neutrino experiments?
How does buying out courses with grant money work?
Are student evaluations of teaching assistants read by others in the faculty?
Sort a list by elements of another list
Closest Prime Number
Do sorcerers' subtle spells require a skill check to be unseen?
How does the UK government determine the size of a mandate?
How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?
Why can methods be overriden but attributes can't?
What is reflection and why is it useful?What is a serialVersionUID and why should I use it?Understanding Python super() with __init__() methodsHow to know if an object has an attribute in PythonWhy is subtracting these two times (in 1927) giving a strange result?Why don't Java's +=, -=, *=, /= compound assignment operators require casting?Why is char[] preferred over String for passwords?Why is it faster to process a sorted array than an unsorted array?Why not inherit from List<T>?Why is printing “B” dramatically slower than printing “#”?
I have a class
public class A
public String attr ="A attribute";
public void method()
System.out.println(this+" , "+this.attr);
public String toString()
return("Object A");
and another class that inherits from it
public class B extends A
public String attr = "B attribute";
public void method()
super.method();
public String toString()
return("Object B");
Note that the method()
of B
is simply a wrapper for method()
of A
.
When I run the following code
B b = new B();
b.method();
I get Object B , A attribute
as output which means that, this
and this.attr
accessed different things. Why is that the case?
Shouldn't System.out.println(this)
refer to the toString()
method of class A
?
java inheritance attributes this shadowing
add a comment |
I have a class
public class A
public String attr ="A attribute";
public void method()
System.out.println(this+" , "+this.attr);
public String toString()
return("Object A");
and another class that inherits from it
public class B extends A
public String attr = "B attribute";
public void method()
super.method();
public String toString()
return("Object B");
Note that the method()
of B
is simply a wrapper for method()
of A
.
When I run the following code
B b = new B();
b.method();
I get Object B , A attribute
as output which means that, this
and this.attr
accessed different things. Why is that the case?
Shouldn't System.out.println(this)
refer to the toString()
method of class A
?
java inheritance attributes this shadowing
1
A modern IDE will have the possibility to show a warning on the second definition ofattr
that it 'shadows' a similarly named field of a superclass.
– Mark Jeronimus
9 hours ago
add a comment |
I have a class
public class A
public String attr ="A attribute";
public void method()
System.out.println(this+" , "+this.attr);
public String toString()
return("Object A");
and another class that inherits from it
public class B extends A
public String attr = "B attribute";
public void method()
super.method();
public String toString()
return("Object B");
Note that the method()
of B
is simply a wrapper for method()
of A
.
When I run the following code
B b = new B();
b.method();
I get Object B , A attribute
as output which means that, this
and this.attr
accessed different things. Why is that the case?
Shouldn't System.out.println(this)
refer to the toString()
method of class A
?
java inheritance attributes this shadowing
I have a class
public class A
public String attr ="A attribute";
public void method()
System.out.println(this+" , "+this.attr);
public String toString()
return("Object A");
and another class that inherits from it
public class B extends A
public String attr = "B attribute";
public void method()
super.method();
public String toString()
return("Object B");
Note that the method()
of B
is simply a wrapper for method()
of A
.
When I run the following code
B b = new B();
b.method();
I get Object B , A attribute
as output which means that, this
and this.attr
accessed different things. Why is that the case?
Shouldn't System.out.println(this)
refer to the toString()
method of class A
?
java inheritance attributes this shadowing
java inheritance attributes this shadowing
edited 4 hours ago
Solomon Ucko
7772822
7772822
asked 10 hours ago
Noah BishopNoah Bishop
1036
1036
1
A modern IDE will have the possibility to show a warning on the second definition ofattr
that it 'shadows' a similarly named field of a superclass.
– Mark Jeronimus
9 hours ago
add a comment |
1
A modern IDE will have the possibility to show a warning on the second definition ofattr
that it 'shadows' a similarly named field of a superclass.
– Mark Jeronimus
9 hours ago
1
1
A modern IDE will have the possibility to show a warning on the second definition of
attr
that it 'shadows' a similarly named field of a superclass.– Mark Jeronimus
9 hours ago
A modern IDE will have the possibility to show a warning on the second definition of
attr
that it 'shadows' a similarly named field of a superclass.– Mark Jeronimus
9 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
By declaring a method with a same name as parent class, you override it, that is, replace the original behaviour. But if you declare a field with a same name, you effectively hide it, making it inaccessible from that subclass, but only by super.field
. See oracle docs on variable hiding, as well as using the keyword super. Note that it is not recommended to use variable hiding, as it creates exactly the kind of confusion you're experiencing.
By calling super.method()
, printing this
results in calling the toString
method, which was in fact overridden - so that's the reason why it prints "Object B", as you've called the method on an instance of B. But the this
in this.attr
actually refers to the parent object, as you're calling the method
from the parent class (by super.method()
).
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55380016%2fwhy-can-methods-be-overriden-but-attributes-cant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
By declaring a method with a same name as parent class, you override it, that is, replace the original behaviour. But if you declare a field with a same name, you effectively hide it, making it inaccessible from that subclass, but only by super.field
. See oracle docs on variable hiding, as well as using the keyword super. Note that it is not recommended to use variable hiding, as it creates exactly the kind of confusion you're experiencing.
By calling super.method()
, printing this
results in calling the toString
method, which was in fact overridden - so that's the reason why it prints "Object B", as you've called the method on an instance of B. But the this
in this.attr
actually refers to the parent object, as you're calling the method
from the parent class (by super.method()
).
add a comment |
By declaring a method with a same name as parent class, you override it, that is, replace the original behaviour. But if you declare a field with a same name, you effectively hide it, making it inaccessible from that subclass, but only by super.field
. See oracle docs on variable hiding, as well as using the keyword super. Note that it is not recommended to use variable hiding, as it creates exactly the kind of confusion you're experiencing.
By calling super.method()
, printing this
results in calling the toString
method, which was in fact overridden - so that's the reason why it prints "Object B", as you've called the method on an instance of B. But the this
in this.attr
actually refers to the parent object, as you're calling the method
from the parent class (by super.method()
).
add a comment |
By declaring a method with a same name as parent class, you override it, that is, replace the original behaviour. But if you declare a field with a same name, you effectively hide it, making it inaccessible from that subclass, but only by super.field
. See oracle docs on variable hiding, as well as using the keyword super. Note that it is not recommended to use variable hiding, as it creates exactly the kind of confusion you're experiencing.
By calling super.method()
, printing this
results in calling the toString
method, which was in fact overridden - so that's the reason why it prints "Object B", as you've called the method on an instance of B. But the this
in this.attr
actually refers to the parent object, as you're calling the method
from the parent class (by super.method()
).
By declaring a method with a same name as parent class, you override it, that is, replace the original behaviour. But if you declare a field with a same name, you effectively hide it, making it inaccessible from that subclass, but only by super.field
. See oracle docs on variable hiding, as well as using the keyword super. Note that it is not recommended to use variable hiding, as it creates exactly the kind of confusion you're experiencing.
By calling super.method()
, printing this
results in calling the toString
method, which was in fact overridden - so that's the reason why it prints "Object B", as you've called the method on an instance of B. But the this
in this.attr
actually refers to the parent object, as you're calling the method
from the parent class (by super.method()
).
edited 10 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
Ondra K.Ondra K.
630720
630720
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55380016%2fwhy-can-methods-be-overriden-but-attributes-cant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
A modern IDE will have the possibility to show a warning on the second definition of
attr
that it 'shadows' a similarly named field of a superclass.– Mark Jeronimus
9 hours ago