What is the difference between “hamstring tendon” and “common hamstring tendon”? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat is the functional difference between hemoglobin and ferritin?Difference between Appendix and the Cecum?The difference between “Hunger” and “Appetite”Difference between flexion and contraction?Difference between intervertebral and vertebral foraminaWhat is the difference between chloride shift and Bohr shift?Difference between the spinal cord and vertebrae columnWhat is the correlation between hand and neck flexibility?Difference between water and teaWhat is the difference between ferritin and hemoglobin?

What day is it again?

Traveling with my 5 year old daughter (as the father) without the mother from Germany to Mexico

Yu-Gi-Oh cards in Python 3

Is there an equivalent of cd - for cp or mv

Reference request: Grassmannian and Plucker coordinates in type B, C, D

How many extra stops do monopods offer for tele photographs?

How to avoid supervisors with prejudiced views?

Is there such a thing as a proper verb, like a proper noun?

Calculate the Mean mean of two numbers

I dug holes for my pergola too wide

Players Circumventing the limitations of Wish

Towers in the ocean; How deep can they be built?

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?

What steps are necessary to read a Modern SSD in Medieval Europe?

Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?

what's the use of '% to gdp' type of variables?

What is the difference between Statistical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics

Are the names of these months realistic?

AB diagonalizable then BA also diagonalizable

How to Implement Deterministic Encryption Safely in .NET

Lucky Feat: How can "more than one creature spend a luck point to influence the outcome of a roll"?

In the "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix" videogame, what potion is used to sabotage Umbridge's speakers?

How to find image of a complex function with given constraints?

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?



What is the difference between “hamstring tendon” and “common hamstring tendon”?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat is the functional difference between hemoglobin and ferritin?Difference between Appendix and the Cecum?The difference between “Hunger” and “Appetite”Difference between flexion and contraction?Difference between intervertebral and vertebral foraminaWhat is the difference between chloride shift and Bohr shift?Difference between the spinal cord and vertebrae columnWhat is the correlation between hand and neck flexibility?Difference between water and teaWhat is the difference between ferritin and hemoglobin?










1












$begingroup$


What is the difference between "hamstring tendon" and "common hamstring tendon"? I have seen both terms being used but I don't know whether they referred to the same tendon.



For example,
Johnson, Anthony E., Robert R. Granville, and Thomas M. DeBerardino. "Avulsion of the common hamstring tendon origin in an active duty airman." Military medicine 168, no. 1 (2003): 40-42. (https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/168.1.40) uses the term "common hamstring tendon" but I don't see any difference with the "hamstring tendon" when reading the article.



Since there are more than one hamstring tendons, I would have guessed that "common hamstring tendon" specifies which hamstring tendon is being referred to, but I haven't seen the term of any anatomy diagram yet.




The hamstring tendons that I am aware of are:



  • Lateral hamstring tendon of the biceps femoris (long head) (2 tendons: distal+proximal)

  • Lateral hamstring tendon of the biceps femoris (short head) (2 tendons: distal+proximal)

  • Medial hamstring tendon of the semitendinosus (2 tendons: distal+proximal)

  • Medial hamstring tendon of the semimembranosus (2 tendons: distal+proximal)

enter image description here



(image source)



enter image description here



(image source)










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    What is the difference between "hamstring tendon" and "common hamstring tendon"? I have seen both terms being used but I don't know whether they referred to the same tendon.



    For example,
    Johnson, Anthony E., Robert R. Granville, and Thomas M. DeBerardino. "Avulsion of the common hamstring tendon origin in an active duty airman." Military medicine 168, no. 1 (2003): 40-42. (https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/168.1.40) uses the term "common hamstring tendon" but I don't see any difference with the "hamstring tendon" when reading the article.



    Since there are more than one hamstring tendons, I would have guessed that "common hamstring tendon" specifies which hamstring tendon is being referred to, but I haven't seen the term of any anatomy diagram yet.




    The hamstring tendons that I am aware of are:



    • Lateral hamstring tendon of the biceps femoris (long head) (2 tendons: distal+proximal)

    • Lateral hamstring tendon of the biceps femoris (short head) (2 tendons: distal+proximal)

    • Medial hamstring tendon of the semitendinosus (2 tendons: distal+proximal)

    • Medial hamstring tendon of the semimembranosus (2 tendons: distal+proximal)

    enter image description here



    (image source)



    enter image description here



    (image source)










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      What is the difference between "hamstring tendon" and "common hamstring tendon"? I have seen both terms being used but I don't know whether they referred to the same tendon.



      For example,
      Johnson, Anthony E., Robert R. Granville, and Thomas M. DeBerardino. "Avulsion of the common hamstring tendon origin in an active duty airman." Military medicine 168, no. 1 (2003): 40-42. (https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/168.1.40) uses the term "common hamstring tendon" but I don't see any difference with the "hamstring tendon" when reading the article.



      Since there are more than one hamstring tendons, I would have guessed that "common hamstring tendon" specifies which hamstring tendon is being referred to, but I haven't seen the term of any anatomy diagram yet.




      The hamstring tendons that I am aware of are:



      • Lateral hamstring tendon of the biceps femoris (long head) (2 tendons: distal+proximal)

      • Lateral hamstring tendon of the biceps femoris (short head) (2 tendons: distal+proximal)

      • Medial hamstring tendon of the semitendinosus (2 tendons: distal+proximal)

      • Medial hamstring tendon of the semimembranosus (2 tendons: distal+proximal)

      enter image description here



      (image source)



      enter image description here



      (image source)










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      What is the difference between "hamstring tendon" and "common hamstring tendon"? I have seen both terms being used but I don't know whether they referred to the same tendon.



      For example,
      Johnson, Anthony E., Robert R. Granville, and Thomas M. DeBerardino. "Avulsion of the common hamstring tendon origin in an active duty airman." Military medicine 168, no. 1 (2003): 40-42. (https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/168.1.40) uses the term "common hamstring tendon" but I don't see any difference with the "hamstring tendon" when reading the article.



      Since there are more than one hamstring tendons, I would have guessed that "common hamstring tendon" specifies which hamstring tendon is being referred to, but I haven't seen the term of any anatomy diagram yet.




      The hamstring tendons that I am aware of are:



      • Lateral hamstring tendon of the biceps femoris (long head) (2 tendons: distal+proximal)

      • Lateral hamstring tendon of the biceps femoris (short head) (2 tendons: distal+proximal)

      • Medial hamstring tendon of the semitendinosus (2 tendons: distal+proximal)

      • Medial hamstring tendon of the semimembranosus (2 tendons: distal+proximal)

      enter image description here



      (image source)



      enter image description here



      (image source)







      human-biology human-anatomy






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago







      Franck Dernoncourt

















      asked 2 hours ago









      Franck DernoncourtFranck Dernoncourt

      2601519




      2601519




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          In the paper you cite, they are talking about the tendon on the other side from the ones you've listed, at the "origin from the ischial tuberosity" (quoted from the abstract).



          In this case, the word "common" is used in the dictionary sense of "same" rather than "ordinary": it's "common" because it's the same origin for the different muscles that make up the hamstrings. This terminology is used elsewhere in anatomy, too, for example the common carotid artery splits into the internal carotid and external carotid; the "common" portion is the larger proximal vessel.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks very much for the information, makes sense! It seems that the semimembranosus tendon has its own attachment though, separate from the conjoined [semitendinosus tendon + long head of the biceps femoris tendon]. I've posted some details as another answer as I didn't have enough space in the comment. If you look at my answer, please let me know if it is incorrect, I'd appreciate any feedback.
            $endgroup$
            – Franck Dernoncourt
            1 hour ago



















          0












          $begingroup$

          Expanding on Bryan Krause's answer:



          From 1:




          The semitendinosus (ST), long head of the biceps femoris (long head, lhBF) and semimembranosus (SM) muscles
          originate from the ischial tuberosity (Fig. 1a, b). The ST and
          lhBF have a common origin on the posteromedial aspect of
          the ischial tuberosity, over its top. Tendons of the ST and
          lhBF are conjoined
          at a distance of 9.1–10 cm [35, 37, 58,
          81]. The SM origin is separate from the previous one and
          it is located anterolaterally from the ST/lhBF attachment.
          Fibres of the proximal SM attachment are twisted before
          forming a proper tendon (Figs. 2a, b, 3a, b, 4).



          A majority of authors agree with the presence of a conjoined tendon of the ST/lhBF, but the precise description of
          its attachment area varies amongst authors. Most of authors
          observed the attachment on the posteromedial aspect of the
          ischial tuberosity as in our dissection [61, 68, 82], whereas
          others indicated it to be directly medial [10, 58] or lateral on
          the ischial tuberosity [35, 60]. Consequently, the SM attachment is also described in different ways: on the anterolateral
          aspect of the ischial tuberosity as in our dissection [61, 68,
          82, 84], but also anteriorly [35] or purely lateral [58]




          Subsequently I am guessing that the "common hamstring tendon" = the conjoined ST tendon + lhBF tendon, but doesn't include the semimembranosus tendon as its attachment is distinct from the attachment of the conjoined ST tendon + lhBF tendon.




          To visualize the attachments of the conjoined ST tendon + lhBF tendon, and the semimembranosus tendon to the ischial tuberosity:



          enter image description here




          Fig. 2 a, b Posterolateral view of the area of the proximal attachment
          of the hamstring muscles (right lower extremity). (1) Area of
          the attachment of the conjoined tendon of the semitendinosus and the
          long head of the biceps femoris; (2) the proximal attachment area of
          the conjoined tendon; (3) conjoined tendon of the semitendinosus and
          the long head of the biceps femoris—cut and rotated 180°; (4) proximal
          tendon of the semimembranosus muscle; (5) area of the attachment
          of the semimembranosus muscle; arrowheads—shape of the
          semimembranosus attachment




          (image source: 1)




          References:



          • 1 Stępień, Karolina, Robert Śmigielski, Caroline Mouton, Bogdan Ciszek, Martin Engelhardt, and Romain Seil. "Anatomy of proximal attachment, course, and innervation of hamstring muscles: a pictorial essay." Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy (2018): 1-12. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5265-z)





          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "375"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbiology.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82397%2fwhat-is-the-difference-between-hamstring-tendon-and-common-hamstring-tendon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            In the paper you cite, they are talking about the tendon on the other side from the ones you've listed, at the "origin from the ischial tuberosity" (quoted from the abstract).



            In this case, the word "common" is used in the dictionary sense of "same" rather than "ordinary": it's "common" because it's the same origin for the different muscles that make up the hamstrings. This terminology is used elsewhere in anatomy, too, for example the common carotid artery splits into the internal carotid and external carotid; the "common" portion is the larger proximal vessel.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thanks very much for the information, makes sense! It seems that the semimembranosus tendon has its own attachment though, separate from the conjoined [semitendinosus tendon + long head of the biceps femoris tendon]. I've posted some details as another answer as I didn't have enough space in the comment. If you look at my answer, please let me know if it is incorrect, I'd appreciate any feedback.
              $endgroup$
              – Franck Dernoncourt
              1 hour ago
















            2












            $begingroup$

            In the paper you cite, they are talking about the tendon on the other side from the ones you've listed, at the "origin from the ischial tuberosity" (quoted from the abstract).



            In this case, the word "common" is used in the dictionary sense of "same" rather than "ordinary": it's "common" because it's the same origin for the different muscles that make up the hamstrings. This terminology is used elsewhere in anatomy, too, for example the common carotid artery splits into the internal carotid and external carotid; the "common" portion is the larger proximal vessel.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thanks very much for the information, makes sense! It seems that the semimembranosus tendon has its own attachment though, separate from the conjoined [semitendinosus tendon + long head of the biceps femoris tendon]. I've posted some details as another answer as I didn't have enough space in the comment. If you look at my answer, please let me know if it is incorrect, I'd appreciate any feedback.
              $endgroup$
              – Franck Dernoncourt
              1 hour ago














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            In the paper you cite, they are talking about the tendon on the other side from the ones you've listed, at the "origin from the ischial tuberosity" (quoted from the abstract).



            In this case, the word "common" is used in the dictionary sense of "same" rather than "ordinary": it's "common" because it's the same origin for the different muscles that make up the hamstrings. This terminology is used elsewhere in anatomy, too, for example the common carotid artery splits into the internal carotid and external carotid; the "common" portion is the larger proximal vessel.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            In the paper you cite, they are talking about the tendon on the other side from the ones you've listed, at the "origin from the ischial tuberosity" (quoted from the abstract).



            In this case, the word "common" is used in the dictionary sense of "same" rather than "ordinary": it's "common" because it's the same origin for the different muscles that make up the hamstrings. This terminology is used elsewhere in anatomy, too, for example the common carotid artery splits into the internal carotid and external carotid; the "common" portion is the larger proximal vessel.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 hours ago









            Bryan Krause♦Bryan Krause

            19.6k23257




            19.6k23257











            • $begingroup$
              Thanks very much for the information, makes sense! It seems that the semimembranosus tendon has its own attachment though, separate from the conjoined [semitendinosus tendon + long head of the biceps femoris tendon]. I've posted some details as another answer as I didn't have enough space in the comment. If you look at my answer, please let me know if it is incorrect, I'd appreciate any feedback.
              $endgroup$
              – Franck Dernoncourt
              1 hour ago

















            • $begingroup$
              Thanks very much for the information, makes sense! It seems that the semimembranosus tendon has its own attachment though, separate from the conjoined [semitendinosus tendon + long head of the biceps femoris tendon]. I've posted some details as another answer as I didn't have enough space in the comment. If you look at my answer, please let me know if it is incorrect, I'd appreciate any feedback.
              $endgroup$
              – Franck Dernoncourt
              1 hour ago
















            $begingroup$
            Thanks very much for the information, makes sense! It seems that the semimembranosus tendon has its own attachment though, separate from the conjoined [semitendinosus tendon + long head of the biceps femoris tendon]. I've posted some details as another answer as I didn't have enough space in the comment. If you look at my answer, please let me know if it is incorrect, I'd appreciate any feedback.
            $endgroup$
            – Franck Dernoncourt
            1 hour ago





            $begingroup$
            Thanks very much for the information, makes sense! It seems that the semimembranosus tendon has its own attachment though, separate from the conjoined [semitendinosus tendon + long head of the biceps femoris tendon]. I've posted some details as another answer as I didn't have enough space in the comment. If you look at my answer, please let me know if it is incorrect, I'd appreciate any feedback.
            $endgroup$
            – Franck Dernoncourt
            1 hour ago












            0












            $begingroup$

            Expanding on Bryan Krause's answer:



            From 1:




            The semitendinosus (ST), long head of the biceps femoris (long head, lhBF) and semimembranosus (SM) muscles
            originate from the ischial tuberosity (Fig. 1a, b). The ST and
            lhBF have a common origin on the posteromedial aspect of
            the ischial tuberosity, over its top. Tendons of the ST and
            lhBF are conjoined
            at a distance of 9.1–10 cm [35, 37, 58,
            81]. The SM origin is separate from the previous one and
            it is located anterolaterally from the ST/lhBF attachment.
            Fibres of the proximal SM attachment are twisted before
            forming a proper tendon (Figs. 2a, b, 3a, b, 4).



            A majority of authors agree with the presence of a conjoined tendon of the ST/lhBF, but the precise description of
            its attachment area varies amongst authors. Most of authors
            observed the attachment on the posteromedial aspect of the
            ischial tuberosity as in our dissection [61, 68, 82], whereas
            others indicated it to be directly medial [10, 58] or lateral on
            the ischial tuberosity [35, 60]. Consequently, the SM attachment is also described in different ways: on the anterolateral
            aspect of the ischial tuberosity as in our dissection [61, 68,
            82, 84], but also anteriorly [35] or purely lateral [58]




            Subsequently I am guessing that the "common hamstring tendon" = the conjoined ST tendon + lhBF tendon, but doesn't include the semimembranosus tendon as its attachment is distinct from the attachment of the conjoined ST tendon + lhBF tendon.




            To visualize the attachments of the conjoined ST tendon + lhBF tendon, and the semimembranosus tendon to the ischial tuberosity:



            enter image description here




            Fig. 2 a, b Posterolateral view of the area of the proximal attachment
            of the hamstring muscles (right lower extremity). (1) Area of
            the attachment of the conjoined tendon of the semitendinosus and the
            long head of the biceps femoris; (2) the proximal attachment area of
            the conjoined tendon; (3) conjoined tendon of the semitendinosus and
            the long head of the biceps femoris—cut and rotated 180°; (4) proximal
            tendon of the semimembranosus muscle; (5) area of the attachment
            of the semimembranosus muscle; arrowheads—shape of the
            semimembranosus attachment




            (image source: 1)




            References:



            • 1 Stępień, Karolina, Robert Śmigielski, Caroline Mouton, Bogdan Ciszek, Martin Engelhardt, and Romain Seil. "Anatomy of proximal attachment, course, and innervation of hamstring muscles: a pictorial essay." Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy (2018): 1-12. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5265-z)





            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              Expanding on Bryan Krause's answer:



              From 1:




              The semitendinosus (ST), long head of the biceps femoris (long head, lhBF) and semimembranosus (SM) muscles
              originate from the ischial tuberosity (Fig. 1a, b). The ST and
              lhBF have a common origin on the posteromedial aspect of
              the ischial tuberosity, over its top. Tendons of the ST and
              lhBF are conjoined
              at a distance of 9.1–10 cm [35, 37, 58,
              81]. The SM origin is separate from the previous one and
              it is located anterolaterally from the ST/lhBF attachment.
              Fibres of the proximal SM attachment are twisted before
              forming a proper tendon (Figs. 2a, b, 3a, b, 4).



              A majority of authors agree with the presence of a conjoined tendon of the ST/lhBF, but the precise description of
              its attachment area varies amongst authors. Most of authors
              observed the attachment on the posteromedial aspect of the
              ischial tuberosity as in our dissection [61, 68, 82], whereas
              others indicated it to be directly medial [10, 58] or lateral on
              the ischial tuberosity [35, 60]. Consequently, the SM attachment is also described in different ways: on the anterolateral
              aspect of the ischial tuberosity as in our dissection [61, 68,
              82, 84], but also anteriorly [35] or purely lateral [58]




              Subsequently I am guessing that the "common hamstring tendon" = the conjoined ST tendon + lhBF tendon, but doesn't include the semimembranosus tendon as its attachment is distinct from the attachment of the conjoined ST tendon + lhBF tendon.




              To visualize the attachments of the conjoined ST tendon + lhBF tendon, and the semimembranosus tendon to the ischial tuberosity:



              enter image description here




              Fig. 2 a, b Posterolateral view of the area of the proximal attachment
              of the hamstring muscles (right lower extremity). (1) Area of
              the attachment of the conjoined tendon of the semitendinosus and the
              long head of the biceps femoris; (2) the proximal attachment area of
              the conjoined tendon; (3) conjoined tendon of the semitendinosus and
              the long head of the biceps femoris—cut and rotated 180°; (4) proximal
              tendon of the semimembranosus muscle; (5) area of the attachment
              of the semimembranosus muscle; arrowheads—shape of the
              semimembranosus attachment




              (image source: 1)




              References:



              • 1 Stępień, Karolina, Robert Śmigielski, Caroline Mouton, Bogdan Ciszek, Martin Engelhardt, and Romain Seil. "Anatomy of proximal attachment, course, and innervation of hamstring muscles: a pictorial essay." Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy (2018): 1-12. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5265-z)





              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Expanding on Bryan Krause's answer:



                From 1:




                The semitendinosus (ST), long head of the biceps femoris (long head, lhBF) and semimembranosus (SM) muscles
                originate from the ischial tuberosity (Fig. 1a, b). The ST and
                lhBF have a common origin on the posteromedial aspect of
                the ischial tuberosity, over its top. Tendons of the ST and
                lhBF are conjoined
                at a distance of 9.1–10 cm [35, 37, 58,
                81]. The SM origin is separate from the previous one and
                it is located anterolaterally from the ST/lhBF attachment.
                Fibres of the proximal SM attachment are twisted before
                forming a proper tendon (Figs. 2a, b, 3a, b, 4).



                A majority of authors agree with the presence of a conjoined tendon of the ST/lhBF, but the precise description of
                its attachment area varies amongst authors. Most of authors
                observed the attachment on the posteromedial aspect of the
                ischial tuberosity as in our dissection [61, 68, 82], whereas
                others indicated it to be directly medial [10, 58] or lateral on
                the ischial tuberosity [35, 60]. Consequently, the SM attachment is also described in different ways: on the anterolateral
                aspect of the ischial tuberosity as in our dissection [61, 68,
                82, 84], but also anteriorly [35] or purely lateral [58]




                Subsequently I am guessing that the "common hamstring tendon" = the conjoined ST tendon + lhBF tendon, but doesn't include the semimembranosus tendon as its attachment is distinct from the attachment of the conjoined ST tendon + lhBF tendon.




                To visualize the attachments of the conjoined ST tendon + lhBF tendon, and the semimembranosus tendon to the ischial tuberosity:



                enter image description here




                Fig. 2 a, b Posterolateral view of the area of the proximal attachment
                of the hamstring muscles (right lower extremity). (1) Area of
                the attachment of the conjoined tendon of the semitendinosus and the
                long head of the biceps femoris; (2) the proximal attachment area of
                the conjoined tendon; (3) conjoined tendon of the semitendinosus and
                the long head of the biceps femoris—cut and rotated 180°; (4) proximal
                tendon of the semimembranosus muscle; (5) area of the attachment
                of the semimembranosus muscle; arrowheads—shape of the
                semimembranosus attachment




                (image source: 1)




                References:



                • 1 Stępień, Karolina, Robert Śmigielski, Caroline Mouton, Bogdan Ciszek, Martin Engelhardt, and Romain Seil. "Anatomy of proximal attachment, course, and innervation of hamstring muscles: a pictorial essay." Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy (2018): 1-12. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5265-z)





                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Expanding on Bryan Krause's answer:



                From 1:




                The semitendinosus (ST), long head of the biceps femoris (long head, lhBF) and semimembranosus (SM) muscles
                originate from the ischial tuberosity (Fig. 1a, b). The ST and
                lhBF have a common origin on the posteromedial aspect of
                the ischial tuberosity, over its top. Tendons of the ST and
                lhBF are conjoined
                at a distance of 9.1–10 cm [35, 37, 58,
                81]. The SM origin is separate from the previous one and
                it is located anterolaterally from the ST/lhBF attachment.
                Fibres of the proximal SM attachment are twisted before
                forming a proper tendon (Figs. 2a, b, 3a, b, 4).



                A majority of authors agree with the presence of a conjoined tendon of the ST/lhBF, but the precise description of
                its attachment area varies amongst authors. Most of authors
                observed the attachment on the posteromedial aspect of the
                ischial tuberosity as in our dissection [61, 68, 82], whereas
                others indicated it to be directly medial [10, 58] or lateral on
                the ischial tuberosity [35, 60]. Consequently, the SM attachment is also described in different ways: on the anterolateral
                aspect of the ischial tuberosity as in our dissection [61, 68,
                82, 84], but also anteriorly [35] or purely lateral [58]




                Subsequently I am guessing that the "common hamstring tendon" = the conjoined ST tendon + lhBF tendon, but doesn't include the semimembranosus tendon as its attachment is distinct from the attachment of the conjoined ST tendon + lhBF tendon.




                To visualize the attachments of the conjoined ST tendon + lhBF tendon, and the semimembranosus tendon to the ischial tuberosity:



                enter image description here




                Fig. 2 a, b Posterolateral view of the area of the proximal attachment
                of the hamstring muscles (right lower extremity). (1) Area of
                the attachment of the conjoined tendon of the semitendinosus and the
                long head of the biceps femoris; (2) the proximal attachment area of
                the conjoined tendon; (3) conjoined tendon of the semitendinosus and
                the long head of the biceps femoris—cut and rotated 180°; (4) proximal
                tendon of the semimembranosus muscle; (5) area of the attachment
                of the semimembranosus muscle; arrowheads—shape of the
                semimembranosus attachment




                (image source: 1)




                References:



                • 1 Stępień, Karolina, Robert Śmigielski, Caroline Mouton, Bogdan Ciszek, Martin Engelhardt, and Romain Seil. "Anatomy of proximal attachment, course, and innervation of hamstring muscles: a pictorial essay." Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy (2018): 1-12. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5265-z)






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 1 hour ago









                Franck DernoncourtFranck Dernoncourt

                2601519




                2601519



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Biology Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbiology.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82397%2fwhat-is-the-difference-between-hamstring-tendon-and-common-hamstring-tendon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What does “fit” mean in this sentence? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How does 'jealousy' mean 'suspicion'?What does “not so say” mean?Does “somebody of my caliber” mean the speaker themselves?“accounting for high fasting blood glucose”- help about the meaningWhat does “cloaked by NDA” mean in this context?What does it mean by 'community ownership' in this context?What does “human corroborators” mean in this context?What does “everything but a fire” mean in this context?What does “run” mean here?What does “rabbited” mean/imply in this sentence?

                    History of India Contents Prehistoric era (until c. 3300 BCE) Bronze Age – "First urbanisation" (c. 3300 – c. 1800 BCE) Climate change, de-urbanisation, and Indo-Aryan migrations (c.1800 – 1500 BCE) Iron Age - Vedic period (c. 1500 – c. 600 BCE) "Second urbanisation" (c. 600 – c. 200 BCE) Classical to early medieval periods (c. 200 BCE – c. 1200 CE) Late medieval period (c. 1200 – 1526 CE) Early modern period (c. 1526–1858 CE) Modern period and independence (after c. 1850 CE) Historiography See also References Further reading External links Navigation menureviewedee[update]The crisisThe Evolution and History of Human Populations in South Asia: Inter-disciplinary Studies in Archaeology, Biological Anthropology, Linguistics and GeneticsThe Ancient Indus: Urbanism, Economy, and Society"Indus River Valley Civilizations"The Ancient Indus: Urbanism, Economy, and Society"India before the British: The Mughal Empire and its Rivals, 1526–1857"Why Europe Grew Rich and Asia Did Not: Global Economic Divergence, 1600–1850Development Centre Studies The World Economy Historical Statistics: Historical StatisticsDeveloping cultures: case studiesEthnic Groups of South Asia and the Pacific: An Encyclopedia: An Encyclopedia"Indian Economy During British Rule""Economic Impact of the British Rule in India | Indian History"The Bone Readers: Science and Politics in Human Origins Research"Out of Africa: new hypotheses and evidence for the dispersal of Homo sapiens along the Indian Ocean rim"10.3109/0301446100363924920334598"Genetic and archaeological perspectives on the initial modern human colonization of southern Asia"2013PNAS..11010699M10.1073/pnas.1306043110369678523754394"Edakkal Caves|Places Around in Wayanad"Protecting megaliths to keep history alive The Hindu daily"Archaeologists rock solid behind Edakkal Cave"The Global Prehistory of Human Migration"Indus Valley 2,000 years older than thought"the original"Stepwells -Cosmology of Subterranean Architecture as seen in Adalaj"A History of Ancient and Early medieval India : from the Stone Age to the 12th century"Stone celts in Harappa"the original"Peoples and languages in pre-islamic Indus valley"the original"The Sindhi language"the originalThe Aryan chromosome"Fluvial landscapes of the Harappan Civilization"2012PNAS..109E1688G10.1073/pnas.1112743109338705422645375"Is River Ghaggar, Saraswati? Geochemical Constraints""An Ancient Civilization, Upended by Climate Change""Huge Ancient Civilization's Collapse Explained"2003GeoRL..30.1425S10.1029/2002GL0168222006QSRv...25.1283M10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.10.0122011QuInt.229..140M10.1016/j.quaint.2009.11.012Climate Change and the Course of Global History: A Rough JourneyA History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th CenturyA History of Ancient and Mediaeval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th CenturyAntennae SwordA History of IndiaA History of IndiaAn Introduction to Hinduism"India: The Late 2nd Millennium and the Reemergence of Urbanism"The Coinage of Ancient IndiaA Sanskrit reader: with vocabulary and notesPedigree: the origins of words from nature"Early Sanskritization. Origins and Development of the Kuru State"10.11588/ejvs.1995.4.823The Sanskrit epics, Part 2The City in South AsiaThe UpanishadsAn Introduction to HinduismReligions of the World, Second Edition: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Beliefs and PracticesA History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th CenturyEarly India: From the Origins to AD 1300Republics in ancient Indiapp. 83ff"Magadha Empire""Lumbini Development Trust: Restoring the Lumbini Garden"the originalThe great armies of antiquityarchived"The Achaemenid Persian Empire (550–330 B.C.)""East–West Orientation of Historical Empires"1076-156X"Dinner on the Grand Trunk Road"10.2307/32502263250226"Silappathikaram Tamil Literature"the originalManimekalai – English transliteration of Tamil originalIndian Temple Architecture: Form and Transformation : the Karṇāṭa Drāviḍa Tradition, 7th to 13th CenturiesBuddhist ArchitectureA History of India"The World Economy (GDP) : Historical Statistics by Professor Angus Maddison"The World Economy – Volume 1: A Millennial Perspective and Volume 2: Historical Statistics10.2307/32502140004-36483250214A Comprehensive History of India: Volume 2Between the Empires: Society in India, 300 to 400Emergence of Viṣṇu and Śiva Images in India: Numismatic and Sculptural Evidence"Parthian Pair of Earrings"the originalThe Medical Times and Gazette, Volume 1Greatest emporium in the worldThe Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BCBuddhist Records of the Western WorldArchaeology in Soviet Central AsiaThe Grandeur of Gandhara: The Ancient Buddhist Civilization of the Swat, Peshawar, Kabul and Indus ValleysIndian Sculpture: Circa 500 B.C.-A.D. 700"The History of Pakistan: The Kushans"Gupta Dynasty – MSN Encartathe original"India – Historical Setting – The Classical Age – Gupta and Harsha""Gupta Dynasty, Golden Age Of India"the original"The Age of the Guptas and After"the originalNumber Theory and Its History"Gupta dynasty (Indian dynasty)""Gupta dynasty: empire in 4th century"the original"The Story of India – Photo Gallery"The ASI say499315420"Pallava script"p. 145"CNG: eAuction 329. INDIA, Post-Gupta (Ganges Valley). Vardhanas of Thanesar and Kanauj. Harshavardhana. Circa AD 606–647. AR Drachm (13mm, 2.28 g, 1h)""Harsha""Sthanvishvara (historical region, India)""Harsha (Indian emperor)"Shyama Kumar Chattopadhyaya (2000) The Philosophy of Sankar's Advaita VedantaShankara's IntroductionShankara's Introduction19373677Shankara's IntroductionIs The Buddhist 'No-Self' Doctrine Compatible With Pursuing Nirvana?The Seven Spiritual Laws Of YogaIndia: The Ancient Past. A History of the Indian-Subcontinent from 7000 BC to AD 1200The Kashmir Series: Glimpses of Kashmiri Culture – Vivekananda Kendra, Kanyakumari (p. 57).Al-Hind: Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam, 7th–11th CenturiesHistory of GopāchalaLand of Two Rivers: A History of Bengal from the Mahabharata to MujibEuropean Trade and Colonial ConquestA History of IndiaA Comprehensive History Of Ancient India (3 Vol. Set)"The Last Years of Cholas: The decline and fall of a dynasty"the originalFascinating Hindutva: Saffron Politics and Dalit MobilisationGazetteer of the province of OudhAl- Hind: The slave kings and the Islamic conquest. 2"Shahi Family"The Cambridge history of Islam"Ameer Nasir-ood-deen Subooktugeen"Gazetteer of the Attock District, 1930, Part 1Land of seven rivers: History of India's GeographyTemple Desecration and Indo-Muslim StatesIslam in South Asia: A Short HistoryBeyond Orientalism: The Work of Wilhelm Halbfass and Its Impact on Indian and Cross-cultural StudiesThe Making of Terrorism in Pakistan: Historical and Social Roots of ExtremismOrnament in Indian ArchitectureA historical review of Hindu India: 300 B.C. to 1200 A.D."Indian States and Union Territories"Islam in South Asia: A Short HistoryA Brief History of the Indian PeoplesThe Modern ReviewDelhi Sultanate"Battuta's Travels: Delhi, capital of Muslim India"the original"Timur – conquest of India"the originalIndia HandbookBhaktiThe Four Denomination of Hinduism10.1007/s11407-008-9049-925691067"Vijayanagara Research Project::Elephant Stables"10.2307/26465262646526Historical Dictionary of the TamilsBihar General Knowledge DigestMapping Bihar: From Medieval to Modern TimesPopular Literature and Pre-modern Societies in South AsiaA manual of the Kistna district in the presidency of MadrasAncient Indian History and CivilizationFragmented Memories: Struggling to be Tai-Ahom in India"The Islamic World to 1600: Rise of the Great Islamic Empires (The Mughal Empire)"the originalDynasties: A Global History of Power, 1300–1800, p. 105"Whose fort is it anyway"10.1111/0020-8833.000532600793Development Centre Studies The World Economy Historical Statistics: Historical Statistics"India's Deindustrialization in the 18th and 19th Centuries"The Mughal Empire, p. 190"The Long Globalization and Textile Producers in India"The Mughal World: Life in India's Last Golden AgeAurangzeb: The Life and Legacy of India's Most Controversial KingIn the Shadow of the Taj: A Portrait of Agra"Iran in the Age of the Raj"p. 8610.2307/20539802053980Delhi, the Capital of IndiaAn Advanced History of Modern India"Journal of the Tanjore Maharaja Serfoji's Sarasvati Mahal Library"The Rediscovery of India: A New SubcontinentIslamic Renaissance In South Asia (1707–1867) : The Role Of Shah Waliallah & His SuccessorsAn Advanced History of Modern IndiaThe Great Maratha Mahadaji Scindia"Full text of "Selections from the papers of Lord Metcalfe; late governor-general of India, governor of Jamaica, and governor-general of Canada""The Discovery Of IndiaThe Sacred City of the Hindus: An Account of Benares in Ancient and Modern TimesResurrecting Banaras: Urban Space, Architecture and Religious BoundariesFaith & Philosophy of Sikhism"Missiles mainstay of Pak's N-arsenal"History Modern India By S.N. Sen"Sirajuddaula"ArchivedLongman History & Civics (Dual Government in Bengal)Madhya Pradesh National Means-Cum-Merit Scholarship Exam (Warren Hasting's system of Dual Government)A Military History of Britain: from 1775 to the PresentIndian Cultural Heritage Perspective For TourismHindu Rulers, Muslim Subjects: Islam, Rights, and the History of KashmirIndian HistoryAn Atlas and Survey of South Asian HistoryAn Historical Account of the British Trade Over the Caspian SeaIndian Merchants and Eurasian Trade, 1600–1750The Indian diaspora in Central Asia and its trade, 1550–1900From Constantinople to the home of Omar Khayyam: travels in Transcaucasia and northern Persia for historic and literary researchA journey from Bengal to England: through the northern part of India, Kashmire, Afghanistan, and Persia, and into Russia, by the Caspian-SeaA Second Journey through Persia, Armenia, and Asia Minor, to Constantinople, between the Years 1810 and 1816Reports from the consuls of the United States, 1887Portugal and its Empire, 1250–1800 (Collected Essays in Memory of Glenn J. Ames).: Portuguese Studies Review, Vol. 17, No. 1The Dutch Power in Kerala, 1729–1758http://mod.nic.inArchivedDossier Goa – A Recusa do Sacrifício InútilAn Imperial Crisis in British India: The Manipur Uprising of 1891The Truth of Babri Mosque"Kolkata (Calcutta) : History"the original"Robert Clive, Baron Clive, 'Clive of India', 1725–1774""The Transformation from a Pre-Colonial to a Colonial Order: The Case of India"10.2307/25955872595587A versatile geniusArchived10.1109/MWSYM.1997.602854"Rabindranath Tagore on Education"the original"Essay on 'Derozio and the Young Bengal Movement'"Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation"Plague"the originalPopulation Growth and Land Use"Reintegrating India with the World Economy""Census Of India 1931"A history of modern India, 1480–1950"'India's well-timed diversification of army helped democracy' | Business Standard News"Bal Gangadhar Tilak: Struggle for Swaraj"Participants from the Indian subcontinent in the First World War""Commonwealth War Graves Commission Annual Report 2007–2008 Online"the original1462689197110.1017/s0010417500016534178920Eurocentrism: a marxian critical realist critique"Ranjit Guha, "On Some Aspects of Historiography of Colonial India""10.2307/2168385216838510.7202/016593ar"Harvard scholar says the idea of India dates to a much earlier time than the British or the Mughals""In The Footsteps of Pilgrims""India's spiritual landscape: The heavens and the earth""India: A Sacred Geography by Diana L Eck – review"Modern India: The Origins of an Asian Democracy10.2307/21694222169422964322464"The Indian Subcontinent and 'Out of Africa 1'"254043308Encyclopedia of World ReligionsThe Evolution and History of Human Populations in South Asia: Inter-disciplinary Studies in Archaeology, Biological Anthropology, Linguistics and Genetics"The Early Paleolithic of the Indian Subcontinent: Hominin Colonization, Dispersals and Occupation History"Ancient Indian History and CivilizationAncient Indian Social History: Some Interpretationsthe originalIndia Before EuropeA Concise History of Modern India"The beginning of the historical period, c. 500–150 BCE"full textA History of Indiathe originalexcerpt and text searchexcerptexcerptAn Economic History of India: From Pre-Colonial Times to 1991excerpt and text searchexcerpt and text searchIndia as known to the ancient world10.1111/j.1468-0289.1985.tb00391.x2597191onlineThe History of India, as told by its own historians. The Muhammadan Periodonline editionHans William Brown research collection on 19th-century missionary work in India, 1882–1932, Ms. Coll. 1033, Kislak Center for Special Collections, Rare Books and Manuscripts, University of Pennsylvaniaee

                    Isurus Índice Especies | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación"A compendium of fossil marine animal genera (Chondrichthyes entry)"o orixinal"A review of the Tertiary fossil Cetacea (Mammalia) localities in wales port taf Museum Victoria"o orixinalThe Vertebrate Fauna of the Selma Formation of Alabama. Part VII. Part VIII. The Mosasaurs The Fishes50419737IDsh85068767Isurus2548834613242066569678159923NHMSYS00210535017845105743