What would be the main consequences for a country leaving the WTO? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDoes the WTO itself have any input into trade agreements?Can schedules be bilaterally agreed in the WTO forum?What's Trump frustration with the WTO?Leaving the EU without a deal and MFN rulesHave any prominent Brexiteers argued for the UK to become a duty-free country (like Singapore)?Does the WTO have a concept of “default” or standard tariffs?No-deal Brexit: What would be the basis for a WTO complaint if goods entering Ireland are checked at Dunkirk?Can the UK deal selectively with Ireland post-Brexit without falling afoul of WTO rules?

How to Implement Deterministic Encryption Safely in .NET

Do I need to write [sic] when including a quotation with a number less than 10 that isn't written out?

If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?

Is it correct to say moon starry nights?

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?

What does "shotgun unity" refer to here in this sentence?

What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?

From jafe to El-Guest

How do I fit a non linear curve?

Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin

Players Circumventing the limitations of Wish

Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"?

Lucky Feat: How can "more than one creature spend a luck point to influence the outcome of a roll"?

Help/tips for a first time writer?

Can you teleport closer to a creature you are Frightened of?

What flight has the highest ratio of timezone difference to flight time?

Audio Conversion With ADS1243

Redefining symbol midway through a document

When "be it" is at the beginning of a sentence, what kind of structure do you call it?

What is the difference between "hamstring tendon" and "common hamstring tendon"?

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?

What was Carter Burkes job for "the company" in "Aliens"?

Are the names of these months realistic?

Does destroying a Lich's phylactery destroy the soul within it?



What would be the main consequences for a country leaving the WTO?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDoes the WTO itself have any input into trade agreements?Can schedules be bilaterally agreed in the WTO forum?What's Trump frustration with the WTO?Leaving the EU without a deal and MFN rulesHave any prominent Brexiteers argued for the UK to become a duty-free country (like Singapore)?Does the WTO have a concept of “default” or standard tariffs?No-deal Brexit: What would be the basis for a WTO complaint if goods entering Ireland are checked at Dunkirk?Can the UK deal selectively with Ireland post-Brexit without falling afoul of WTO rules?










5















Trump threatened to leave the WTO a while back. (This might be understated, but I won't search how many times he may have said that.)



What I want to ask is: what would be the consequences for a country, big or small, if it just left the WTO? I assume (economic) size might make a difference in outcomes, although I could be wrong on this.



As far as I know there aren't any concrete example of countries who left, but if I'm somehow wrong on this (too), then we could have a concrete example of the consequences. If not, then perhaps we'd have to rely on some published analyses of such WTO-exit scenarios for an answer.










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    @JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

    – Fizz
    3 hours ago















5















Trump threatened to leave the WTO a while back. (This might be understated, but I won't search how many times he may have said that.)



What I want to ask is: what would be the consequences for a country, big or small, if it just left the WTO? I assume (economic) size might make a difference in outcomes, although I could be wrong on this.



As far as I know there aren't any concrete example of countries who left, but if I'm somehow wrong on this (too), then we could have a concrete example of the consequences. If not, then perhaps we'd have to rely on some published analyses of such WTO-exit scenarios for an answer.










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    @JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

    – Fizz
    3 hours ago













5












5








5








Trump threatened to leave the WTO a while back. (This might be understated, but I won't search how many times he may have said that.)



What I want to ask is: what would be the consequences for a country, big or small, if it just left the WTO? I assume (economic) size might make a difference in outcomes, although I could be wrong on this.



As far as I know there aren't any concrete example of countries who left, but if I'm somehow wrong on this (too), then we could have a concrete example of the consequences. If not, then perhaps we'd have to rely on some published analyses of such WTO-exit scenarios for an answer.










share|improve this question














Trump threatened to leave the WTO a while back. (This might be understated, but I won't search how many times he may have said that.)



What I want to ask is: what would be the consequences for a country, big or small, if it just left the WTO? I assume (economic) size might make a difference in outcomes, although I could be wrong on this.



As far as I know there aren't any concrete example of countries who left, but if I'm somehow wrong on this (too), then we could have a concrete example of the consequences. If not, then perhaps we'd have to rely on some published analyses of such WTO-exit scenarios for an answer.







wto






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









FizzFizz

12.8k12981




12.8k12981







  • 1





    @JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

    – Fizz
    3 hours ago












  • 1





    @JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

    – Fizz
    3 hours ago







1




1





@JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

– Fizz
3 hours ago





@JJJ: I don't know. Is there an economic shock effect for leaving, for instance? It's part of the question.

– Fizz
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














One way to try to answer this is to look at the benefits of the WTO. The main two are Most Favored Nation and National Treatment:



  • Most Favored Nation basically says that if you lower a trade barrier for one nation you have to do the same for the others.


  • National Treatment basically means that you can't discriminate between locally produced goods and foreign goods. I'm not privy with the details but I'd spitball this is related to not favoring local businesses in government contracts, or at least not in broad daylight.


Conversely, if you were to leave the WTO, it would mean that your existing trading partners can now:



  • Lower trade barriers with other WTO members without lowering them for you; and increase trade barriers on you.


  • Favor their own local producers, and those of other WTO members, in lieu of yours.


A third benefit that you'd lose is the well oiled dispute resolution mechanism. Going forward you'd need to go negotiate arbitration clauses and put language to that effect in each trade treaty. Which I would imagine is not a big deal in practice. It would probably carry less predictable outcomes, but at the same time it could end up benefitting you on average if you're the 800 pound gorilla in the room.



A fourth benefit might also be that WTO members don't seem to go to war with one another very often. (They do impose sanctions on each other from time to time, though -- e.g. Russia.)



As to what would be the practical benefit for any country, in terms of economic damage, it would depend on the country and it's frankly anyone's guess.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "475"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40081%2fwhat-would-be-the-main-consequences-for-a-country-leaving-the-wto%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    One way to try to answer this is to look at the benefits of the WTO. The main two are Most Favored Nation and National Treatment:



    • Most Favored Nation basically says that if you lower a trade barrier for one nation you have to do the same for the others.


    • National Treatment basically means that you can't discriminate between locally produced goods and foreign goods. I'm not privy with the details but I'd spitball this is related to not favoring local businesses in government contracts, or at least not in broad daylight.


    Conversely, if you were to leave the WTO, it would mean that your existing trading partners can now:



    • Lower trade barriers with other WTO members without lowering them for you; and increase trade barriers on you.


    • Favor their own local producers, and those of other WTO members, in lieu of yours.


    A third benefit that you'd lose is the well oiled dispute resolution mechanism. Going forward you'd need to go negotiate arbitration clauses and put language to that effect in each trade treaty. Which I would imagine is not a big deal in practice. It would probably carry less predictable outcomes, but at the same time it could end up benefitting you on average if you're the 800 pound gorilla in the room.



    A fourth benefit might also be that WTO members don't seem to go to war with one another very often. (They do impose sanctions on each other from time to time, though -- e.g. Russia.)



    As to what would be the practical benefit for any country, in terms of economic damage, it would depend on the country and it's frankly anyone's guess.






    share|improve this answer





























      3














      One way to try to answer this is to look at the benefits of the WTO. The main two are Most Favored Nation and National Treatment:



      • Most Favored Nation basically says that if you lower a trade barrier for one nation you have to do the same for the others.


      • National Treatment basically means that you can't discriminate between locally produced goods and foreign goods. I'm not privy with the details but I'd spitball this is related to not favoring local businesses in government contracts, or at least not in broad daylight.


      Conversely, if you were to leave the WTO, it would mean that your existing trading partners can now:



      • Lower trade barriers with other WTO members without lowering them for you; and increase trade barriers on you.


      • Favor their own local producers, and those of other WTO members, in lieu of yours.


      A third benefit that you'd lose is the well oiled dispute resolution mechanism. Going forward you'd need to go negotiate arbitration clauses and put language to that effect in each trade treaty. Which I would imagine is not a big deal in practice. It would probably carry less predictable outcomes, but at the same time it could end up benefitting you on average if you're the 800 pound gorilla in the room.



      A fourth benefit might also be that WTO members don't seem to go to war with one another very often. (They do impose sanctions on each other from time to time, though -- e.g. Russia.)



      As to what would be the practical benefit for any country, in terms of economic damage, it would depend on the country and it's frankly anyone's guess.






      share|improve this answer



























        3












        3








        3







        One way to try to answer this is to look at the benefits of the WTO. The main two are Most Favored Nation and National Treatment:



        • Most Favored Nation basically says that if you lower a trade barrier for one nation you have to do the same for the others.


        • National Treatment basically means that you can't discriminate between locally produced goods and foreign goods. I'm not privy with the details but I'd spitball this is related to not favoring local businesses in government contracts, or at least not in broad daylight.


        Conversely, if you were to leave the WTO, it would mean that your existing trading partners can now:



        • Lower trade barriers with other WTO members without lowering them for you; and increase trade barriers on you.


        • Favor their own local producers, and those of other WTO members, in lieu of yours.


        A third benefit that you'd lose is the well oiled dispute resolution mechanism. Going forward you'd need to go negotiate arbitration clauses and put language to that effect in each trade treaty. Which I would imagine is not a big deal in practice. It would probably carry less predictable outcomes, but at the same time it could end up benefitting you on average if you're the 800 pound gorilla in the room.



        A fourth benefit might also be that WTO members don't seem to go to war with one another very often. (They do impose sanctions on each other from time to time, though -- e.g. Russia.)



        As to what would be the practical benefit for any country, in terms of economic damage, it would depend on the country and it's frankly anyone's guess.






        share|improve this answer















        One way to try to answer this is to look at the benefits of the WTO. The main two are Most Favored Nation and National Treatment:



        • Most Favored Nation basically says that if you lower a trade barrier for one nation you have to do the same for the others.


        • National Treatment basically means that you can't discriminate between locally produced goods and foreign goods. I'm not privy with the details but I'd spitball this is related to not favoring local businesses in government contracts, or at least not in broad daylight.


        Conversely, if you were to leave the WTO, it would mean that your existing trading partners can now:



        • Lower trade barriers with other WTO members without lowering them for you; and increase trade barriers on you.


        • Favor their own local producers, and those of other WTO members, in lieu of yours.


        A third benefit that you'd lose is the well oiled dispute resolution mechanism. Going forward you'd need to go negotiate arbitration clauses and put language to that effect in each trade treaty. Which I would imagine is not a big deal in practice. It would probably carry less predictable outcomes, but at the same time it could end up benefitting you on average if you're the 800 pound gorilla in the room.



        A fourth benefit might also be that WTO members don't seem to go to war with one another very often. (They do impose sanctions on each other from time to time, though -- e.g. Russia.)



        As to what would be the practical benefit for any country, in terms of economic damage, it would depend on the country and it's frankly anyone's guess.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 hours ago

























        answered 2 hours ago









        Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

        13.9k33860




        13.9k33860



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40081%2fwhat-would-be-the-main-consequences-for-a-country-leaving-the-wto%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Isurus Índice Especies | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación"A compendium of fossil marine animal genera (Chondrichthyes entry)"o orixinal"A review of the Tertiary fossil Cetacea (Mammalia) localities in wales port taf Museum Victoria"o orixinalThe Vertebrate Fauna of the Selma Formation of Alabama. Part VII. Part VIII. The Mosasaurs The Fishes50419737IDsh85068767Isurus2548834613242066569678159923NHMSYS00210535017845105743

            Is 1 ppb equal to 1 μg/kg? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to determine the concentration after a dilution with Beer's law?What would be SMILES notation for a compound with delocalized bonding?Amount of substance of a molecule in a solute the same as amount of substance of constituent elements?Interpreting notation format 1.64E-02 from particulate emission dataWhat was the lithium concentration in 1940's 7-Up?Why are osmoles not considered SI units?Why is Ka constant when volume is increased?Should residual sodium be considered in measuring sodium content of sweat?Concentration of mercury in bodyConversion from a PPB value to µg/m3 of Isobutylene

            What does “fit” mean in this sentence? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How does 'jealousy' mean 'suspicion'?What does “not so say” mean?Does “somebody of my caliber” mean the speaker themselves?“accounting for high fasting blood glucose”- help about the meaningWhat does “cloaked by NDA” mean in this context?What does it mean by 'community ownership' in this context?What does “human corroborators” mean in this context?What does “everything but a fire” mean in this context?What does “run” mean here?What does “rabbited” mean/imply in this sentence?