Subalgebra of a group algebra Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Characterization of Complex Group AlgebrasClassification of Hopf algebra with exactly two 1-dimensional modulesCriterion for nilradical of a maximal parabolic subalgebra to be abelian?Iwahori-Hecke algebras as endomorphism (or convolution) algebra?Jacobson radical and group rings/subalgebrasSoluble group algebras and centralizersMotivational ideas for the Gelfand-Graev character of a finite group of Lie typeWhen is the exterior algebra a Hopf algebra?Symplectic group over finite field and quaternionsCartan subalgebra and group measure space construction
Subalgebra of a group algebra
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Characterization of Complex Group AlgebrasClassification of Hopf algebra with exactly two 1-dimensional modulesCriterion for nilradical of a maximal parabolic subalgebra to be abelian?Iwahori-Hecke algebras as endomorphism (or convolution) algebra?Jacobson radical and group rings/subalgebrasSoluble group algebras and centralizersMotivational ideas for the Gelfand-Graev character of a finite group of Lie typeWhen is the exterior algebra a Hopf algebra?Symplectic group over finite field and quaternionsCartan subalgebra and group measure space construction
$begingroup$
Let $k$ be a field, $G$ a finite group, and $k[G]$ the group algebra.
Let $A$ be a subalgebra of $k[G]$. In general, $A$ is not the group algebra of some subgroup $H$ of $G$.
Question: Is there any criterion for when $A = k[H]$ for some subgroup $H$? Also, in that case, how do we read of the generating subgroup $H$? Will the situation become better/easier if I assume $A$ to be a sub-Hopf-algebra?
gr.group-theory rt.representation-theory noncommutative-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $k$ be a field, $G$ a finite group, and $k[G]$ the group algebra.
Let $A$ be a subalgebra of $k[G]$. In general, $A$ is not the group algebra of some subgroup $H$ of $G$.
Question: Is there any criterion for when $A = k[H]$ for some subgroup $H$? Also, in that case, how do we read of the generating subgroup $H$? Will the situation become better/easier if I assume $A$ to be a sub-Hopf-algebra?
gr.group-theory rt.representation-theory noncommutative-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $k$ be a field, $G$ a finite group, and $k[G]$ the group algebra.
Let $A$ be a subalgebra of $k[G]$. In general, $A$ is not the group algebra of some subgroup $H$ of $G$.
Question: Is there any criterion for when $A = k[H]$ for some subgroup $H$? Also, in that case, how do we read of the generating subgroup $H$? Will the situation become better/easier if I assume $A$ to be a sub-Hopf-algebra?
gr.group-theory rt.representation-theory noncommutative-algebra
$endgroup$
Let $k$ be a field, $G$ a finite group, and $k[G]$ the group algebra.
Let $A$ be a subalgebra of $k[G]$. In general, $A$ is not the group algebra of some subgroup $H$ of $G$.
Question: Is there any criterion for when $A = k[H]$ for some subgroup $H$? Also, in that case, how do we read of the generating subgroup $H$? Will the situation become better/easier if I assume $A$ to be a sub-Hopf-algebra?
gr.group-theory rt.representation-theory noncommutative-algebra
gr.group-theory rt.representation-theory noncommutative-algebra
asked 16 hours ago
StudentStudent
1273
1273
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $A$ is the group algebra of a subgroup, then $k[G]$ will be free as a module over $A$, and that may help to rule out some cases. This is not at all an "if and only if" statement, though.
Proposition 3.2.1 in Sweedler's book Hopf Algebras says that a cocommutative Hopf algebra is a group algebra if and only if it has a basis of group-like elements (those elements $x$ which satisfy $Delta(x) = x otimes x$). So if you have a sub-Hopf algebra, you can try to see if it has such a basis.
Ravenel says in Theorem 6.2.3 in Complex Cobordism and Stable Homotopy Groups of Spheres: "this is equivalent to the existence of a dual basis of idempotent elements $y$ satisfying $y_i^2=y_i$ and $y_iy_j=0$ for $i neq j$."
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is there a characteristic assumption on the last part? Is there division by 2 in formula for y?
$endgroup$
– AHusain
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
Great! Also, I think Sweedler provided a fairly nice answer already, since if A comes from some subgroup, then A is automatically a sub-Hopf-algebra!
$endgroup$
– Student
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
For Ravenel's statement, I do not have access to the book for now. Would you mind pointing it out that in his content, is $A$ assumed to be a Hopf algebra?
$endgroup$
– Student
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Ravenel's book is available from his web page: web.math.rochester.edu/people/faculty/doug/mybooks/ravenel.pdf. He is certainly working in positive characteristic, but I don't know if this is necessary for his condition. He is certainly working with Hopf algebras, since otherwise there wouldn't be a multiplication on the dual.
$endgroup$
– John Palmieri
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JoshuaGrochow: Ravenel uses his version to show that a particular Hopf algebra is a group algebra, so he found it useful.
$endgroup$
– John Palmieri
7 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
The characteristic of the field is important here, when considering Hopf sub-algebras. The Cartier-Kostant-Milnor-Moore theorem says that a cocommutative Hopf algebra $H$ over an algebraically closed field $k$ of characteristic 0, is a semidirect product of a group algebra and an enveloping algebra of a Lie algebra. In particular, if $H$ is finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebra over $k$, then $H$ is isomorphic to a group algebra.
This theorem is not true over algebraically closed fields in positive characteristics, as there are restricted enveloping $p$-Lie algebras that are finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebras but not isomorphic to group algebras.
See the introduction of https://cel.archives-ouvertes.fr/cel-00374383/document (by Nicolas Andruskiewitsch) for further information.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The CKMM theorem is very powerful! Is there a way to read off the group algebra part?
$endgroup$
– Student
11 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f328396%2fsubalgebra-of-a-group-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $A$ is the group algebra of a subgroup, then $k[G]$ will be free as a module over $A$, and that may help to rule out some cases. This is not at all an "if and only if" statement, though.
Proposition 3.2.1 in Sweedler's book Hopf Algebras says that a cocommutative Hopf algebra is a group algebra if and only if it has a basis of group-like elements (those elements $x$ which satisfy $Delta(x) = x otimes x$). So if you have a sub-Hopf algebra, you can try to see if it has such a basis.
Ravenel says in Theorem 6.2.3 in Complex Cobordism and Stable Homotopy Groups of Spheres: "this is equivalent to the existence of a dual basis of idempotent elements $y$ satisfying $y_i^2=y_i$ and $y_iy_j=0$ for $i neq j$."
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is there a characteristic assumption on the last part? Is there division by 2 in formula for y?
$endgroup$
– AHusain
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
Great! Also, I think Sweedler provided a fairly nice answer already, since if A comes from some subgroup, then A is automatically a sub-Hopf-algebra!
$endgroup$
– Student
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
For Ravenel's statement, I do not have access to the book for now. Would you mind pointing it out that in his content, is $A$ assumed to be a Hopf algebra?
$endgroup$
– Student
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Ravenel's book is available from his web page: web.math.rochester.edu/people/faculty/doug/mybooks/ravenel.pdf. He is certainly working in positive characteristic, but I don't know if this is necessary for his condition. He is certainly working with Hopf algebras, since otherwise there wouldn't be a multiplication on the dual.
$endgroup$
– John Palmieri
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JoshuaGrochow: Ravenel uses his version to show that a particular Hopf algebra is a group algebra, so he found it useful.
$endgroup$
– John Palmieri
7 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
If $A$ is the group algebra of a subgroup, then $k[G]$ will be free as a module over $A$, and that may help to rule out some cases. This is not at all an "if and only if" statement, though.
Proposition 3.2.1 in Sweedler's book Hopf Algebras says that a cocommutative Hopf algebra is a group algebra if and only if it has a basis of group-like elements (those elements $x$ which satisfy $Delta(x) = x otimes x$). So if you have a sub-Hopf algebra, you can try to see if it has such a basis.
Ravenel says in Theorem 6.2.3 in Complex Cobordism and Stable Homotopy Groups of Spheres: "this is equivalent to the existence of a dual basis of idempotent elements $y$ satisfying $y_i^2=y_i$ and $y_iy_j=0$ for $i neq j$."
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is there a characteristic assumption on the last part? Is there division by 2 in formula for y?
$endgroup$
– AHusain
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
Great! Also, I think Sweedler provided a fairly nice answer already, since if A comes from some subgroup, then A is automatically a sub-Hopf-algebra!
$endgroup$
– Student
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
For Ravenel's statement, I do not have access to the book for now. Would you mind pointing it out that in his content, is $A$ assumed to be a Hopf algebra?
$endgroup$
– Student
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Ravenel's book is available from his web page: web.math.rochester.edu/people/faculty/doug/mybooks/ravenel.pdf. He is certainly working in positive characteristic, but I don't know if this is necessary for his condition. He is certainly working with Hopf algebras, since otherwise there wouldn't be a multiplication on the dual.
$endgroup$
– John Palmieri
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JoshuaGrochow: Ravenel uses his version to show that a particular Hopf algebra is a group algebra, so he found it useful.
$endgroup$
– John Palmieri
7 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
If $A$ is the group algebra of a subgroup, then $k[G]$ will be free as a module over $A$, and that may help to rule out some cases. This is not at all an "if and only if" statement, though.
Proposition 3.2.1 in Sweedler's book Hopf Algebras says that a cocommutative Hopf algebra is a group algebra if and only if it has a basis of group-like elements (those elements $x$ which satisfy $Delta(x) = x otimes x$). So if you have a sub-Hopf algebra, you can try to see if it has such a basis.
Ravenel says in Theorem 6.2.3 in Complex Cobordism and Stable Homotopy Groups of Spheres: "this is equivalent to the existence of a dual basis of idempotent elements $y$ satisfying $y_i^2=y_i$ and $y_iy_j=0$ for $i neq j$."
$endgroup$
If $A$ is the group algebra of a subgroup, then $k[G]$ will be free as a module over $A$, and that may help to rule out some cases. This is not at all an "if and only if" statement, though.
Proposition 3.2.1 in Sweedler's book Hopf Algebras says that a cocommutative Hopf algebra is a group algebra if and only if it has a basis of group-like elements (those elements $x$ which satisfy $Delta(x) = x otimes x$). So if you have a sub-Hopf algebra, you can try to see if it has such a basis.
Ravenel says in Theorem 6.2.3 in Complex Cobordism and Stable Homotopy Groups of Spheres: "this is equivalent to the existence of a dual basis of idempotent elements $y$ satisfying $y_i^2=y_i$ and $y_iy_j=0$ for $i neq j$."
answered 14 hours ago
John PalmieriJohn Palmieri
2,35011726
2,35011726
$begingroup$
Is there a characteristic assumption on the last part? Is there division by 2 in formula for y?
$endgroup$
– AHusain
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
Great! Also, I think Sweedler provided a fairly nice answer already, since if A comes from some subgroup, then A is automatically a sub-Hopf-algebra!
$endgroup$
– Student
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
For Ravenel's statement, I do not have access to the book for now. Would you mind pointing it out that in his content, is $A$ assumed to be a Hopf algebra?
$endgroup$
– Student
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Ravenel's book is available from his web page: web.math.rochester.edu/people/faculty/doug/mybooks/ravenel.pdf. He is certainly working in positive characteristic, but I don't know if this is necessary for his condition. He is certainly working with Hopf algebras, since otherwise there wouldn't be a multiplication on the dual.
$endgroup$
– John Palmieri
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JoshuaGrochow: Ravenel uses his version to show that a particular Hopf algebra is a group algebra, so he found it useful.
$endgroup$
– John Palmieri
7 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Is there a characteristic assumption on the last part? Is there division by 2 in formula for y?
$endgroup$
– AHusain
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
Great! Also, I think Sweedler provided a fairly nice answer already, since if A comes from some subgroup, then A is automatically a sub-Hopf-algebra!
$endgroup$
– Student
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
For Ravenel's statement, I do not have access to the book for now. Would you mind pointing it out that in his content, is $A$ assumed to be a Hopf algebra?
$endgroup$
– Student
12 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Ravenel's book is available from his web page: web.math.rochester.edu/people/faculty/doug/mybooks/ravenel.pdf. He is certainly working in positive characteristic, but I don't know if this is necessary for his condition. He is certainly working with Hopf algebras, since otherwise there wouldn't be a multiplication on the dual.
$endgroup$
– John Palmieri
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JoshuaGrochow: Ravenel uses his version to show that a particular Hopf algebra is a group algebra, so he found it useful.
$endgroup$
– John Palmieri
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is there a characteristic assumption on the last part? Is there division by 2 in formula for y?
$endgroup$
– AHusain
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is there a characteristic assumption on the last part? Is there division by 2 in formula for y?
$endgroup$
– AHusain
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
Great! Also, I think Sweedler provided a fairly nice answer already, since if A comes from some subgroup, then A is automatically a sub-Hopf-algebra!
$endgroup$
– Student
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Great! Also, I think Sweedler provided a fairly nice answer already, since if A comes from some subgroup, then A is automatically a sub-Hopf-algebra!
$endgroup$
– Student
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
For Ravenel's statement, I do not have access to the book for now. Would you mind pointing it out that in his content, is $A$ assumed to be a Hopf algebra?
$endgroup$
– Student
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
For Ravenel's statement, I do not have access to the book for now. Would you mind pointing it out that in his content, is $A$ assumed to be a Hopf algebra?
$endgroup$
– Student
12 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Ravenel's book is available from his web page: web.math.rochester.edu/people/faculty/doug/mybooks/ravenel.pdf. He is certainly working in positive characteristic, but I don't know if this is necessary for his condition. He is certainly working with Hopf algebras, since otherwise there wouldn't be a multiplication on the dual.
$endgroup$
– John Palmieri
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ravenel's book is available from his web page: web.math.rochester.edu/people/faculty/doug/mybooks/ravenel.pdf. He is certainly working in positive characteristic, but I don't know if this is necessary for his condition. He is certainly working with Hopf algebras, since otherwise there wouldn't be a multiplication on the dual.
$endgroup$
– John Palmieri
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@JoshuaGrochow: Ravenel uses his version to show that a particular Hopf algebra is a group algebra, so he found it useful.
$endgroup$
– John Palmieri
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JoshuaGrochow: Ravenel uses his version to show that a particular Hopf algebra is a group algebra, so he found it useful.
$endgroup$
– John Palmieri
7 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
The characteristic of the field is important here, when considering Hopf sub-algebras. The Cartier-Kostant-Milnor-Moore theorem says that a cocommutative Hopf algebra $H$ over an algebraically closed field $k$ of characteristic 0, is a semidirect product of a group algebra and an enveloping algebra of a Lie algebra. In particular, if $H$ is finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebra over $k$, then $H$ is isomorphic to a group algebra.
This theorem is not true over algebraically closed fields in positive characteristics, as there are restricted enveloping $p$-Lie algebras that are finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebras but not isomorphic to group algebras.
See the introduction of https://cel.archives-ouvertes.fr/cel-00374383/document (by Nicolas Andruskiewitsch) for further information.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The CKMM theorem is very powerful! Is there a way to read off the group algebra part?
$endgroup$
– Student
11 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The characteristic of the field is important here, when considering Hopf sub-algebras. The Cartier-Kostant-Milnor-Moore theorem says that a cocommutative Hopf algebra $H$ over an algebraically closed field $k$ of characteristic 0, is a semidirect product of a group algebra and an enveloping algebra of a Lie algebra. In particular, if $H$ is finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebra over $k$, then $H$ is isomorphic to a group algebra.
This theorem is not true over algebraically closed fields in positive characteristics, as there are restricted enveloping $p$-Lie algebras that are finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebras but not isomorphic to group algebras.
See the introduction of https://cel.archives-ouvertes.fr/cel-00374383/document (by Nicolas Andruskiewitsch) for further information.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The CKMM theorem is very powerful! Is there a way to read off the group algebra part?
$endgroup$
– Student
11 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The characteristic of the field is important here, when considering Hopf sub-algebras. The Cartier-Kostant-Milnor-Moore theorem says that a cocommutative Hopf algebra $H$ over an algebraically closed field $k$ of characteristic 0, is a semidirect product of a group algebra and an enveloping algebra of a Lie algebra. In particular, if $H$ is finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebra over $k$, then $H$ is isomorphic to a group algebra.
This theorem is not true over algebraically closed fields in positive characteristics, as there are restricted enveloping $p$-Lie algebras that are finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebras but not isomorphic to group algebras.
See the introduction of https://cel.archives-ouvertes.fr/cel-00374383/document (by Nicolas Andruskiewitsch) for further information.
$endgroup$
The characteristic of the field is important here, when considering Hopf sub-algebras. The Cartier-Kostant-Milnor-Moore theorem says that a cocommutative Hopf algebra $H$ over an algebraically closed field $k$ of characteristic 0, is a semidirect product of a group algebra and an enveloping algebra of a Lie algebra. In particular, if $H$ is finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebra over $k$, then $H$ is isomorphic to a group algebra.
This theorem is not true over algebraically closed fields in positive characteristics, as there are restricted enveloping $p$-Lie algebras that are finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebras but not isomorphic to group algebras.
See the introduction of https://cel.archives-ouvertes.fr/cel-00374383/document (by Nicolas Andruskiewitsch) for further information.
answered 4 hours ago
Oeyvind SolbergOeyvind Solberg
4314
4314
$begingroup$
The CKMM theorem is very powerful! Is there a way to read off the group algebra part?
$endgroup$
– Student
11 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The CKMM theorem is very powerful! Is there a way to read off the group algebra part?
$endgroup$
– Student
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
The CKMM theorem is very powerful! Is there a way to read off the group algebra part?
$endgroup$
– Student
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
The CKMM theorem is very powerful! Is there a way to read off the group algebra part?
$endgroup$
– Student
11 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f328396%2fsubalgebra-of-a-group-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown